So what do you think? Is it poor design and execution from Free Radical or the PS3's hardware that caused HAZE to come out as poor as it did?

I would really like to know, because something went terribly wrong with this game. What really worries me is how PS3 games have to sacrifice a ton to be able to get a good framerate.

Launch games always get let off the hook because of the "rushed" excuse, but HAZE doesn't get to use that excuse. This game has been in development how long? Terrible story O.K., but with all the delays and time in development either the PS3 isn't nearly capable as some would try and make you believe or Free Radical is clueless on developing for the PS3.

I paid my $60 to "find out for yourself" even with all signs pointing towards ****, and I got burned big time. If anything positive comes of this is that I now know what happens when a game fails in every segment....HAZE

nothing is wrong with the ps3 hardware. play uncharted. nuff said

quote:

Originally posted by phantomreaver:
nothing is wrong with the ps3 hardware. play uncharted. nuff said

Uncharted is amazing if only it was a little longer....

Microsoft's ploy playing into people being so easily manipulated by what they see as the main crowd.

It may or may not have poor design and execution...

BUT OMG IT'S FUN!!!!!!!

I only get very small frame rate loss during game saves (Checkpoints).

Doesn't bother me.

I dont come and register to your Halo fanboy forums just to bash your game so why do the same to us. We are here because we like it, leave us alone.