|
|
aegis you are UTS so that is why you go against HLLs
|
| |
|
|
|
Yeah dont bag on HLL until u can beat us. Since no clan can, no1 can bag on us.
|
| |
|
|
|
I want a Haze sequel but no muiltiplayer trophies.
|
| |
|
|
|
Are you sure Crytek bought the rights for HAZE? As far as I recall, they only bought Free Radical and most of it's staff.
Ubisoft published HAZE, and as far as I know, they like to force developers to give up the licenses to their own games, not just share profits.
For example, what happened to Far Cry? The original Far Cry was made by CRYTEK, but published by UBISOFT. Who made Far Cry 2? UBISOFT, because if Crytek wanted Far Cry 1 published, they'd have to give up the license to Ubi. And they did. Now, in order to publish another game, they had to make a completely new IP (Crysis) and try a different publisher.
I'm willing to bet that Ubisoft did the same stuff to Free Radical. If we EVER get to se a Haze 2, it'll be typical Ubisoft shovelware, it may not have co-op at all, but will look better. It'll be, overall, a decent game lacking any personality and lookin' good. (See: Far Cry 2.)
|
| |
|
|
|
I've never really played Haze before, but I have heard many things about it. Its story and AI were very mediocre. Even its morality within the story was not strong enough. However, I am pretty glad that there was a game developer who wished to take FPSs into a new direction, and maybe a sequel would improve on many aspects of Haze, even how the story and morality work together. FPSs definitely need more meaningfulness presented within them, and Haze was a good experiment.
|
| |
|