If one side is granted access to the WMD, the opposing side should never have access to their WMD until the deficit side fires their WMD. As in, if in Conquest mode, DEFCON is triggered, the winning side should never have access to their WMD until the opposition fires it. WMD control should not be granted for the winning side under any circumstances until the losing side launches their WMD, even if reserves run low. Those are best reserved for Assault gametypes.

I’m sick of having access to a WMD and thinking I’m safe, then having the opposition drop his WMD on me from seemingly nowhere!

How can you justify to me the opposition getting first-strike capability when I was thrown into deficit DEFCON and granted first-strike ability? This contradicts everything we have been told about the idea that those losing get WMD access first, and the opposition can never fire their WMD until the losing side fires!

This has nothing to do with a "Technical" issue and you should learn how to play before bitching.

As punishment for your abuse of the internets you are hearby stripped of all internets.

I think my online record speaks for itself in terms of whether or not I know how to play

then you justify to me how i can be granted first-strike capability, but the opposition can then drop their WMD on me in the same game when I'm granted authority to fire the first shot

I don't disagree but this is in no way a "technical" issue. This is the way the game was designed.

true. this is more gameplay than technical. but since it's close to the suggestions forum, i felt it was warranted