Thanks you for deleting my thread mods, i guess you guy have not heard of freedom of speech, here is what i don't like about the game, if you guys cant take criticism there is no point in being in the gaming buisness.

Here what i dont like about the game from the latest trailer.

Iron sights look less realistic than the previous game.

unrealistic health regen system

lack of recoil on the weapons

The fact that in the game grenades make people go flying in the air, which is unrealistic.

Third person system which is unrealistic and does not fit in the game.

I liked the other games, because they were actually quite authentic, but this one just seems dissapointing,

I wouldn`t jump up on a soap box yet Irishman. You better read the forum rules before you speak. No swearing, can you read? And don`t give me that freedom of speech talk. This is a forum for young and old alike, and since there are young ones that come here, your going to clean up the words, do you understand me? Any more of them from anyone, and it`s an automatic ban for a month.

I apologise for swearing

quote:

Originally posted by DrunkIrishman:
Thanks you for deleting my thread mods, i guess you guy have not heard of freedom of speech, here is what i don't like about the game, if you guys cant take criticism there is no point in being in the gaming buisness.

Here what i dont like about the game from the latest trailer.

Iron sights look less realistic than the previous game.

unrealistic health regen system

lack of recoil on the weapons

The fact that in the game grenades make people go flying in the air, which is unrealistic.

Third person system which is unrealistic and does not fit in the game.

I liked the other games, because they were actually quite authentic, but this one just seems dissapointing,

I agree, the iron sights to look less realistic, given they do not take up the majority of the camera.

There is no health regen system. You have a risk indicator, telling you that you are in danger of being shot. This, in my opinion, is very realistic. It has been stated that one round can easily kill you, if you expose yourself to it.

The weapons look to have a fair amount of recoil, but this will be better judged after the games release, or maybe just a closer look.

If you are under the impression that grenades cannot send a human flying, then you are sadly mistaken. I have personally heard acounts of frag grenades sending insurgents from one end of the street to another.

The third person system is obviously unrealistic. I doubt it was placed in the game with the belief that it was. It does, however, add a bit of flare to a game coming on its 3rd installment. From what I have heard from the recent previews, it has been done quite well.

I have no problem with you giving your opinion of the game at all. It`s the swearing that we need to get under control.

[QUOTE]Originally posted by DrunkIrishman:

The fact that in the game grenades make people go flying in the air, which is unrealistic.

[QUOTE]

ehm.....Irish man...hve you ever steped on a grende or a mine ones ??????? i did,thank god i was in a tank.

But you shoulda know that grenades blow up stuff.....including people!

This is just adding a little to the list, game still looks awesome cant wait. But I still dont get why the graphics always take a step back everytime they show something.. Maybe its just me but alot of things including the gun models hands etc.. dont look that great. especially thompson in trailer.

quote:

Originally posted by Drumslave1116:
This is just adding a little to the list, game still looks awesome cant wait. But I still dont get why the graphics always take a step back everytime they show something.. Maybe its just me but alot of things including the gun models hands etc.. dont look that great. especially thompson in trailer.

The way he held the Thompson makes it look like his thumb is broken.

yeah his thumb definatly looks weird, almost like its missing some bone fragment. I also noticed a detection problem with the browning .30 cal's. it looks like their bipods arent touching the cover that they are resting on.

quote:

Originally posted by onermedboxer:
yeah his thumb definatly looks weird, almost like its missing some bone fragment. I also noticed a detection problem with the browning .30 cal's. it looks like their bipods arent touching the cover that they are resting on.

At least there are bipods that are down now. It can't be perfect if you can deploy the gun anywhere you want.

Its the shrapnel what kill's people when a grenade goes off, and modern grenades may be more powerful than ww2 grenades.

Red orchestra got how grenades work best, they didnt send people that far' but they would be covered in blood from shrapnel wound's.

Garand and other weapons definatly don't have enough recoil, in the previous games the recoil system was pretty good, so why change something what does not need fixing, the weapons were challenging and satisfying to shoot.

And the third person system just seems a little pointless and unrealistic, a first person cover system of some sort would be much better, third person just seems to make the game look too easy.

quote:

Originally posted by DrunkIrishman:
Its the shrapnel what kill's people when a grenade goes off, and modern grenades may be more powerful than ww2 grenades.

Red orchestra got how grenades work best, they didnt send people that far' but they would be covered in blood from shrapnel wound's.

Garand and other weapons definatly don't have enough recoil, in the previous games the recoil system was pretty good, so why change something what does not need fixing, the weapons were challenging and satisfying to shoot.

And the third person system just seems a little pointless and unrealistic, a first person cover system of some sort would be much better, third person just seems to make the game look too easy.

That is the same way I feel.

Well im sure if they made people fly up from grenades then it would probably happen. Or else someone would probably correct them.

I agree with you that the guns do seem too easy to fire, with not enough recoil. I also agree the iron sites don't seems that great

Dont know about the grenades, so I wont comment.

However, I think the new 3rd person cover system and health systems are much better and authentic. The red blur doesn't mean your damaged, just in danger of being damaged, I think thats good. You can always turns of the red blur off (hopefully) if you wish.

But I do think the 3rd person cover system would be better and more 'personal' if it was in 1st person.

I think the cover system would be fine if it was made first person.

quote:

Originally posted by Drumslave1116:
Well im sure if they made people fly up from grenades then it would probably happen. Or else someone would probably correct them.

Grenades ar not high explosives like artillery shells or mortars, the effect would be fine if they were hit by some kind of artillery, because that has the power, but shrapnel off of a grenade isnt going to send you miles

quote:

Originally posted by DrunkIrishman:

quote:

Originally posted by Drumslave1116:
Well im sure if they made people fly up from grenades then it would probably happen. Or else someone would probably correct them.

Grenades ar not high explosives like artillery shells or mortars, the effect would be fine if they were hit by some kind of artillery, because that has the power, but shrapnel off of a grenade isnt going to send you miles

Well tell that to my friends Casper and Lars...tell that to my dad...his left leg got allmost blown up from a pine tree grenade in 'Nam.

If grenades doesen't kill you,the shrapnel will.Modern Grenades are atleast 40% more lethal the there ww2 models, and if you got hit by one of those shrapnel pieces you wish you where dead.

remember the video that baker got blown off his feet in the kids store....he ended up wich a metal fragment in his chest...I saw that i person in Iraq...I can eat pretty much every thing and have a concrete stomach but even i had a hard time wathing it

Grenades aren't toys

quote:

Originally posted by Finn1939:
The red blur doesn't mean your damaged, just in danger of being damaged

From what I understand, it is a damage system. They just came up with an explanation to make it sound better. I'm not sure, but it sounds like you won't get shot until the screen is very red. If that isn't the case I guess it wouldn't be as bad.

i think this game is a lot less realistic than the first games.

Heres what i don't like:

I watched the videos showing the guns off and i think the use of 3rd person camera makes the game unrealistic. With 3rd person you are less likely to be ambushed or flanked in multi-player. In the old game you face one direction but in 3rd person you can see more without even poking your head out when your in cover.

Last i think the sights on the guns are way too big.

Oh yeah the BAR on the weapons page is totally messed up.

quote:

Originally posted by Sgt_Freeman.:
I think the cover system would be fine if it was made first person.

I thought EA did a great job on MoH A cover system and think that is what GB should of done with this game. I know its MoH A but hey you got to give them credet on the cover system or lean feature what ever you call it.