this game is the greats WW2 game i have ever played. i have been a big fan since hill 30 i was on the glued to my tv and i still am. i took a break from the story line and went and played on line. here are a cuple thing u might want to fix before the laders start on gamebattles.com . lags, bugs, glices, and of corse u have to have clan support u have too. u must get this. you do not want to be like battlefield bad company that game went down the drane becuase of no clan support. you WILL get alot more buys if u get clan support. good job on the game and fix the stuff befor the season starts.
alanthemaster

WOW, Great story line with the Characters and All, Love the cinematics, and the single player experience was a real blast for me Thanks Gearbox and Ubisoft great game, I do however have One or Two small 'Bad' Notes:

1. Firstly, as i was playing through the single player story mode i noticed how the Graphics were good, but not great, for instance i noticed how in the videos of gameplay posted on the official website and on you tube looked somehow better than what you actually get. Further more I was disapointed when one of the missions shown in the video here:



WHy was this not in the game, i was looking forward to that sneaking up on the german and shooting him from behind while he fell off the rooftop. Then wathcing the wounded soldier get draged away by his freinds. And what happened to your squad mates triping up or falling over like they would in real life, this never happened for me at all throughout the whole game. Finnaly i generally found the single player a little short, and the acheivments a little easy, after all i did pay £40 for my Xbox 360 version.

2. Okay so yer, i suppose co Op single player wouldnt really work very well, but for future BIA games could someting like this be implemented somehow, I can see it pushing up the gameplay expeirince alot, and don't say its not possible cos really, it is, especially maybe having 2 squads in the co op story, like Matt and Red Together leading a squad each, it could be Split screen Co Op and Internet CO Op and comon, you know it wouold be awesome.

3. The Multiplayer was a mostly negative experince for me. I liked the core gameplay, and most of what had been done, but the poor graphics in MP hit me, was like the environments were dull and lifeless, and the maps were put together in a rush. The lag really dissapointed me, I live in South of the UK so i don't know what its like for our freinds in USA, but everything was too laggy. I was running allong the street and then suddenly I apppeared back at where i started as if i had teleported, and whilest i was contemplating What had just happened i suddenly fell dead on the floor, saying i had been shot in the head with a sniper rifle. Another problem with the multiplayer is it hasn't seemed to have been niceley polished, im meaning the bugs and graphics in general, its not like the single player experience at all. I would like to see an update at least, it could bring out a new gameplay mode, like skirmish mode or something, and maybe a few maps and whatever, and it could really do with lag and bug fixes too, a shame you wont be able to do much about the weird graphics on MP but oh well. Thanks and sorry about the rather long moan i Had, just wanted to get my disspaointed frustration out of me.

I loved the Brother's In Arms Games on the first xbox and have been waiting since the 360 came out for the new one. the one player game is very good and i love the squad combat options. however what i was looking forward to most was the multiplayer. the mulitplayer on the original xbox was brilliant, very different from ordinary first person shooters and something well thought out and totally unique. i am totally disapointed by the mulitplayer on the new game. it has too many players online at once, but most importantly no player controlled squads. the graphics in mulitplayer are awful too. it is a real shame that a unique and tactical multiplayer experience has been replaced with a third rate call of duty multiplayer.

i will play the one player game, but so wish ubisoft could have left the mulitplayer how it was. if i want just first person shooter mulitplayers there are lots of better games for this out there. i really wanted 1v1 -maybe up to max 3v3 full player squad multiplayer it was so much fun on the old xbox. is there any way this could be added in an update as i cannot see any point in playing the mulitplayer that is there at present. such a wasted opportunity. please fix!

After waiting so long for this I'm deeply disapointed in the MP. The single player is everything I expected but I was really looking forward to co-op play which was originally listed as a feature on X-box live's game description. Please add co-op multiplayer. I would like to see a game mode were 4 people can play together against AI trying to achieve ojectives or patrol style were you recon an area and have to fight the enemy, something like Rainbow Six Vegas terrorist hunt.

Alot of individuals seem to want this game to be like every other, then they base there views of the game without really taking it for what it is. This game was designed to be almost counter-strike like.

If that isn't your cup of tea then to each his or her own. But this game has delivered to many, and I wish more would realize that it wasn't supposted to turn out like a COD 4 or a Halo or Gears of War game. It was designed to be a squad based shooter with tactics incorporated. Those who can't get that in there head I'm sorry you simply don't understand that this game is applying to a certain type of gaming community nothing more.

Give gearbox credit atleast for finally delivering the game and setting out what they set out to accomplish.

Some fixes/additions I'd personally like to see are:

MP Fixes:

Fix the Lag Issue

More Maps

More Match Settings

- Ex. Increased timer, turn off crosshairs for everyone in the room, no HUD?, etc. Increased timer would allow players to get to know the map as a team.

Proximity Hearing in MP?

Put these guns back in!!!!!!!

- Springfield

- M1 Carbine

- Grease Gun

- Kar98

- Kar98 Scoped

- FG42

- Lugar

Player Vito/Vote Map option.

Medic Class

Be incapacitated, but not dead?

Gore-System

Slow-mo Death/Kill Cam

Jeeps/Half Tracks/Mobile Artillery (20mm?)

- The mobile artillery would be a great addition to the game. Must have atleast 2 players to operate, one to rotate the barrel, the other to fire. To move you need to have atleast 3 people and it is a timely, slow process.

Theres probably more but those are the main ones.

PS3 trophies would be nice, I'm pretty sure this will boost up sales too.

Person 1: "Hmm I'm not sure whether I should buy this game, I really don't know."
Person 2: "BIA has trophies, unlike that other game you're looking at."
Person 3: "Cool, I'll take this one then."

Also, please fix the fuzziness on the guys face that you play as.

The multiplayer is crap. Sorry, - but it just is. Why even bother including it in the game? Unless you're REALLY, REALLY, REALLY focusing on the multiplayer (games such as Resistance 2), why bother even including it? It's obvious it's not going to be better than other multiplayer online games/experiences, i.e. CoD4, Resistance 2 (coming soon).. the time spent on the multiplayer might have been better time spent improving the single player mode.

Just IMO.

Its great but we need SKIRMISH and TOUR OF DUTY back. Along with the old fashion mutiplayer.

what drives me mad about mp is that im in a game its 4 versus 4 im winning 3-0 with most of the kills for my team some of the other players on the other team decide to quit and then i get automatically moved to the other team to balance numbers.that in my opinion is unfair its like you get punished for being tactical in you gameplay whereas the other team just run around looking for the enemy and suffer the consequences by getting pwned and then because they cant respawn they leave the game early,and then i get moved to the other side and have to start with a 3-0 handicap it really does suck.please ubisoft dont punish players who actully try to be tactical in a game by putting them on the losing side it really makes me not want to play mp

i think it would be cool that if they make a co-op mode, you could play as either Red or Baker.

The games really good, but here,s a small list of additions and changes that would make the fourth game badass. First weapon selecton. I know you can change your weapons at the begging of a level, but not all of them. Add a crate at the start of each level. Next ditch the tank levels,and go back to adding a tank sqaud once in awhile. It was awsome using them as cover and you had to keep an eye on them or panzers would get em. Driving the tanks was something most average action shooter games have. BIA has never been avarage, and doesnt need vehicle levels taking you away from Bakers experences. My last request besides the the enemy ai issues that other posts mentioned would be adding iron sites when your in cover. Like others posts stated its to easy using the cross hairs in the easier difficulties, and to much of a blind fire in realstic, and I think it keeps it more real if it would jump to sites when zooming in from cover. I hope other people see these points, but its just my input.

I feel like these posts are straying to far from the real reason so many of the true fans of the BiA franchise are so upset with the multi player.
And that reason being the AI or lack there of...

dont get me wrong single player is sweet, for children, but i am a adult and the only reason i play single player is to learn the controls so i can kick some but online.

Im playing the single player,, having a good time,, everything is just like the old version on xbox but better,, im ready to play online now,, find a room, the game starts..
right off the bat im trying to tell my squad to take cover somewhere but they are not responding i look around there not even there. everybody is running around like a chicken whith there heads choped off shooting at everything that moves.
please bring back the AI squads back in MP. I know its a new game but the only thing that is diffrent from the old one is the thing i liked the most. i dont want to trade it, there is no other game out there like it. i just want it fixed back the way it was.

wigg79, I can remember people complaining that they just had to have more people to play the MP and not the AI. It was one of the biggest complaints from the last game. Now what happens after they do make it so more can play together online? Were back to square one. Now it`s not enough AI. Well, it can`t be both ways. Either way, someone gets upset about it. What do you think the devs. should do about it? Toss a coin, heads more AI, tails more people. Who wins?

Got to be honest loving the game loved the other 2 same with this could not care less about mp got a dozen other games to satisfy this need. only complaint you cannot put a bandaid on your squad members as they lie twitching on the ground.

I really donlt understand anyone who can rate this game, another Ubisoft flop, see Silent Hunter series - how many soldiers do you know who go into battel without so much as a grenade ?, Why are there save points, afterall who is playing the game, you or the software ?, if software then why not let the s/ware just play the game and make all the decisions ? - medipacks ? have ubisoft never heard of them ? Trying to be MOH and failing dismally, glad I didn't buy the game, I borrowed it and gave the same feedback as I got, story line of good, maybe even factual but overall, the game really has a lot to try and live up to - 3 / 10

1 - Ubisoft dont make it man, Gearbox do
2 - Medipacks - since when do some bandages and a magic canteen make a bullet wound 'all better' on a real battlefield?

No complains about the game
it's awesome in every ****in' way
I Love It ..
Can't wait for the new one ^^

every bia game
=
PERFECT !!

I realy missed the maps you have shown in the trailers for exaple in the first trailer there was that realy nice map but, then the maps weren't in the game.

think about the future, the new bia will be bettter, but randy says he is looking to improve hells highway with what the fans want.

I joined these forums just right now so that my opinion can be heard. Such a disappointment should not go without being told.

well first off I dont believe the year of delay/wait was worth it in any way, with that much time on their hands you'd think that perhaps the graphics would either match or exceed the title "gears of war." Most of my problem exists on the graphics alone. Its simply not xbox 360 worthy at all. the multiplayer is too singular, and there should have been AI bots. Co-op would have been a great boost in the games overall value, but apparently someone thought they should ruin the game back at the headquarters, I will more than likely buy the next installment (I find it funny how they use maneuvers like this to get you to spend another 60 dollars....*in sarcasm* thanks alot guys, you really pulled it off this time.

quote:

Originally posted by blakus939:
1 - Ubisoft dont make it man, Gearbox do
2 - Medipacks - since when do some bandages and a magic canteen make a bullet wound 'all better' on a real battlefield?

I totally agree...Gearbox, don't even THINK about throwing in medpacks and other magical pickups in the 4th game
It's good as it is.