|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
![]() |
I held an m1 carbine on friday.
its really light, are the rumors about the killing power true? I want to shoot one so bad |
||
|
Official BIA Forum Armorer![]() |
Well, here I am...
Here is some links as I am pressed for time right now. I may elaborate later. http://www.surplusrifle.com/m1carbine/index.asp http://www.surplusrifle.com/m1carbine/ammunition.asp I'll throw this one in also. http://www.websitetoolbox.com/tool/post/surplusrifle/vpost?id=946631 This message has been edited. Last edited by: Kentuck, |
|||
|
the M1 Carbine is using shorterned 30 cal cartridges, so it packs less punch
dont forget the M1 Garand actually is a battle rifle, meaning the round pack a lot of knock-out power the M1 Carbine is designed to be light-weight and more portable.... its more like an assault rifle than a battle rifle... |
||||
|
|
|
aren't you a little young to hold a firearm? hehe...j/k
"1st Lt. Dike: 1st sergeant Lipton? you get things organized here. I'm gonna go for...help!" |
|||
|
the garand has plenty of power,but holds close to half as the carbine. id definatly want the garand though.
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
![]() |
I own an M1 Carbine, from Auto-Ordnance. Fun as hell to shoot and its just under 3ft in total length and weighs in at only 5 lbs. The carbine's .30 cal round travels at slower rates than some other military rounds of the time. The .30 cal carbine round has a lower velocity and killing power too. It simply doesnt penetrate skin as violently as other rounds. The gun itself was developed as just a lightweight, more weildy version of the M1 Garand.
Banner generated at Pimp-My-Profile.comThe CIA doesn't assassinate people, they just depopulate areas. He who stands on toilet is high on pot? PSN: HornetDriver192 |
|||
|
![]() |
You mean the M1 Carbine has half the power of the M1 Garand. The Carbine's muzzle velocity runs around 1900fps while the Garand's hits 2800fps with ease. The M1 Garand was a heavy SOB with an effective range near 500 yards, while the Carbine was a little SOB hitting somewhere around 300 yards. The M1 Carbine, although highly more accurate than .45 cal weapons like the Thompson, was still incapable of penetrating light cover. Banner generated at Pimp-My-Profile.comThe CIA doesn't assassinate people, they just depopulate areas. He who stands on toilet is high on pot? PSN: HornetDriver192 |
|||
|
I think he means it holds close to half the number of rounds, 8 compared to 15
We have to watch out for the Hanomag carried troops, their fast hard and crazy as **** PSN Account: Hanomag1404 |
||||
|
The M1 Carbine's lack of power is mostly unfounded rumor. It could be considered the 'best pistol ever' for its basic use, as it's more powerful than a .357 magnum, and nobody disrespects that. Still it's a carbine and not a rifle, so its ability to penetrate cover and be effective at over 200 yards is lacking. It's really quite a bit more capable than many people give it credit for.
It's still an excellent weapon and was pretty ideal for paratroopers at the time. |
||||
|
| Powered by Eve Community |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|

