Hey everyone, there should be a Blazing Angels 3
The Cold War, then Blazing Angels 4 secret missions for the world and soon on. Blazing Angels 1 and 2 are great, the games should go on!

Question:
Why can't there be more Blazing Angels?

Choices:
There can, and you can help!
Send messages to the compay of Blazing Angels, give them ideas like mine

 

I agree the games are great... i hope to see many more... but polls dont seem to work on this forum???? who knows why but as far as I can tell none have ever worked... lol

OTTO44
PS3

I know. Why don't people help? I see some people saying if that the game was too easy and the first one was better. Why don't people try and tell the company there ideas for a better BA game?

Honestly I really dont think they (UBISOFT) care...

I have been posting messages and reading this forum since November last year when BA1 came out and it seems like the only time that anyone involved with Ubisoft cares what is said here is when the messages get nasty between people... I would love to see some interaction between the makers and us players... I have posted questions and even asked Ubisoft's contact e-mail some of my questions all with the same end result,,, NADDA....

I would love to put in my 2 cents on what I like about both BA1 and BA2... If they took the good points of both games and combined them I would love it. But what I like others do not. I like the guns in BA1... In BA2 if you know the map you should never get killed you can go from repair to repair to shield...ect... Guns are no where strong enough in BA2... I would like to see the planes stats have more to do with the game. In BA1 the P-51 Mustang was NOT the plane to use but yet in WWII it recorded the most kills of any aircraft... The planes all have the same celing not the case in the real world... The BF 109 was a high altitude fighter... this game takes away that advantage... many many other attributes that are just overlooked in the programming..

I do not like the late model era planes with the self guided missiles... Others think that is where the game should head. I also do not care for the defensive weapons... They are a part of the game and I learned how to deal, but I do not like them...


OTTO44
PS3

Shadowshaden stop creating useless polls please

Thanks

first of all, this is forums, i can write any ideas or thoughts as i want. These polls are not useless, there facts.

Wow... Fix the polls so they work then....

The way I see it... It started a topic... Whats so bad about that. Is that not what the forum is here for??? For people to voice their thoughts and opinions????

I dont get Ubisoft.... Add thrir 2 cents when it really doesnt matter.... lol

OTTO44
PS3

I'll be head hunting if a BA3 does come out. Good luck

You forgot a choice

Let it die and forget about it since they can't develop the game properly for the PC.

LOL Empty_Soul... I am still ready...lol

As for Blud_E_Gutz I cant say for the PC but the PS3 is ok... A few glitches and a few spots that they could have made a bit better but overall a good game.

OTTO44
PS3

It's been over a month and no one has voted.

(My vote was in response to the 'fix the polls so they work then')

There's nothing wrong with the poll - it's working

So my statement stands.

Blazing Angels is an example of what not to do with an Aircraft game. Blazing Angels 2 seemed as if the Devs took the easy way out.

With that said, Blazing Angels 1 was far better then the the sequel, but not void of glaring although fixable issues.

If they decided to make a sequel, which in all probability they wont, Ubisoft needs to listen to the gamers pulse, that, and of course avoid the disrespect on the War winning capabilities of American Aviation.

cottob44 - Not to be anal, but the P-51 Mustang did NOT get the most aerial kills in WW2. It was responsible for the most American kills in the European theater (roughly half of the US totals in the region)!! Regardless, you are correct. The Mustang (along with others) were completely disrespected, and I am not convinced on the reasons. It could have been in error due to poor research or some Anti-American sentiment. Who knows??

IMO, HAWX is now the flagship air shooter title for Ubisoft, with Blazing Angels being an IP that has sung its swan song due to poor sales.

quote:

Originally posted by bitebug2003:
It's been over a month and no one has voted.

(My vote was in response to the 'fix the polls so they work then')

There's nothing wrong with the poll - it's working

So my statement stands.

Still will not let me vote... Oh and why would anyone go back to see if it was fixed????

Ok the reason is you don't have the permissions to vote in this Forum which I find a little odd.

I'll look into it for you and get back to you

Sorry for the inconvenience

Edit:

Ok everyone should be able to vote now

Once again, I apologise for the confusion.

quote:

Originally posted by bitebug2003:
Ok the reason is you don't have the permissions to vote in this Forum which I find a little odd.

I'll look into it for you and get back to you

Sorry for the inconvenience

Edit:

Ok everyone should be able to vote now

Once again, I apologise for the confusion.

I am not sure if you are able to address this, but since you have frequented this thread, I will ask you.

Where are the Devs? Should they not be standing behind their product?

Why are the questions posed by forum members not addressed?

Will I continue to speak to myself when searching for answers from the powers that be?

Hey! It's me! I'm finally back. I haven't been on this account for over a year. Anyway, I think BA1 and 2 have now became old news. All the new games are ****. I not coming back to this guy anyway, so I don't care if I curse. Anyway, all the news games are so stupid. The old games were so much better! They had a challenge. Now, movies and games are high in detail, bit so short! I know it takes a long time, but just make it ****en hard! Gamers need a challenge!