LOL the run 'n' gunners are afraid to admit it.

either that or we scred all the run a nd gunners away

quote:

Originally posted by twadesayswhat:
either that or we scred all the run a nd gunners away

Hopefully

I think the real run 'n gunners already moved back to COD4. That's their game. Or they can be found on consoles? I don't know of course and it's hard to tell and this forum being mixed doesn't help either.

But I want to believe that beyond the PC gamers anyway, the majority wants Rainbow Six to stay a tactical shooter instead of what it is now. Time will tell when we check the results of the poll.

quote:

Originally posted by DrumFiend:
How many respawns? - 0
How should the respawns work? - They shouldn't
How do you want the health recovery? - No health recovery what so ever and You get wounded and start limping
How do you want to take cover? - Peeking around just like in Raven Shield
What is your gaming style? - Fast and slow depending on the situation, but always tactical.

Basically I want Raven Shield II on a new engine. Updated graphics and physics with old style fluid door opening and fluid movement/ posture. The XP system blows but custom character is ok I guess, still undecided with that one. Oh, and SPAWN TANGOS AT BEGINNING OF ROUND so we can use flash and frags for what they are intended.

i totally agree with you, i love the old rainbow games and how tactics were a major part of the game

The option to choose an amount respawn
Is not working on the POLL

I choose it and its not showing on the results

Are you sure?

The yellow line is above the text. Not below it...

Apparently no one here is smart enough to interpret a bar graph... Take a statistics class, you guys. >__>

48 votes untill now.

I will wait a complete week after the last vote has been done.

I chose fast but tactical but what i really want is fast and very tactical gameplay.

Vegas with 3rd person cover is very slow and would be really boring if it wasn't for the music.

By tactical I mean choice. What is so great about many games is the ability to be creative. The first person shooter market lacks in player creativity. This was one of the main reasons I like the original 3 rainbows so much.

Health System:

I voted for Other.

I would like to see a 100 HP system regeneration hybrid. That idea is too bold for current devs though, since they are making more and more games based on the intelligence of an 8 year old.

The system goes as follows. If you get hit in an area that is not protected by body armor it takes away from the 100 HP base. Headshots are automatic kills, 100 HP hit. Arms and legs, take off certain percentages, also gunshots to the openings in the armor will take away HP. If you get hit in the chest while wearing armor the health goes down 25% per shot , you then have to wait to slowly regenerate health. Since you didn't actually get shot. You are, more or less, stunned. In that case regenaration makes sense. However on the 4th shot to the armor, you fall and you are downed with 10 HP left. If an enemy forgets about you and thinks you are dead then you can get back up and fight. Or if they know you are not dead, they can perform the coup de grace.

Well thats my view on what a good HP system should be and I'm going to school for game design , so if these idiots at Ubi can't fix this game or at least make a decent one in the future. At least you peeps can rest assured that once I get in a position to lead a team to make a game. I won't make the silly mistakes that UBI makes catering to 8-12 year olds.

Hopefully I'm still gaming then,

But I like your HP system

Just as a reminder... 53 on thuesday

quote:

Originally posted by ShatteredDream:
I would like to see a 100 HP system regeneration hybrid *snip*
The system goes as follows. If you get hit in an area that is not protected by body armor it takes away from the 100 HP base. Headshots are automatic kills, 100 HP hit. Arms and legs, take off certain percentages, also gunshots to the openings in the armor will take away HP.*snip*

I'll bet you someone is going to say "That's too much to code!" or "That will cause a ton of lag!"

Before someone says that, lemme pre-counter by saying: "That's bull."

Why?

Look at SWAT 4.
Look at SWAT 3.
Look at BioShock.
Look at GRAW 2 (PC).
Look at GRAW 1 (PC).

quote:

Originally posted by ShatteredDream:
The system goes as follows. If you get hit in an area that is not protected by body armor it takes away from the 100 HP base. Headshots are automatic kills, 100 HP hit. Arms and legs, take off certain percentages, also gunshots to the openings in the armor will take away HP. If you get hit in the chest while wearing armor the health goes down 25% per shot , you then have to wait to slowly regenerate health. Since you didn't actually get shot. You are, more or less, stunned. In that case regenaration makes sense. However on the 4th shot to the armor, you fall and you are downed with 10 HP left. If an enemy forgets about you and thinks you are dead then you can get back up and fight. Or if they know you are not dead, they can perform the coup de grace.

Nice. One of the best ideas I've seen for the health situation IMO. Someone must be talented enough to code that right?

quote:

Originally posted by ShatteredDream:
At least you peeps can rest assured that once I get in a position to lead a team to make a game. I won't make the silly mistakes that UBI makes catering to 8-12 year olds.

Thank you.

Just a reminder: 60 votes on Friday 20 jun