JUMP TO: Splinter Cell ConViction SC Legacy [Console] SC Legacy [PC] Off-Topic Hints/Tips Technical Help

ubi.com    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Splinter Cell  Hop To Forums  Splinter Cell ConViction    Why does the SC series have to be destroyed with Convction? Is there no alternative?
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 

Moderators: Vth_F_Smith_, Woosy
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Splinter Cell & EndWar Moderator
Picture of Vth_F_Smith_
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Shadow_Agent1:
No problems? What about what Sam is actually trying to accomplish? Does it even seem possible?
We're talking about Sam "the UBER spy" Fisher here - of course it is. Ok serious. Yes it is because since Sam knows what kind of tools the authorities are using to hunt him down, he knows what he'll has to avoid, what will make him almost invisible and maybe even how to sabotage their tools / use them against them (Enemy of the state style).
quote:
What about Lambert? Is he dead or not?
That's a good question - maybe we'll get the answer in SCC.
quote:
Should SCE even be taken into effefct?
It can be taken into effect if you adjust the storyline a bit here and there - nothing what a decent storywriter couldn't accomplish.
quote:
what about the dropping of several charactors?
Which ones?
quote:
What about the actual plot? What is Sam doing that is so wrong?
He'll have to find that out himself. Obviously someone wants his head, the only question is why.
quote:
What is he actually trying to do?
Think about it. What would you try to do in Sam's situation? At first you'd probably try to find out what actually happened and who framed you. After that you'd probably try to establish contact with people you know you can trust, in order to get help (informations, clothing, maybe a weapon etc.) from them or try to find some other sources for potencial gear (aka black market). Then you'd probably try to get some evidence that proves your innocence and then you'd most likely try to find out, why Person X is trying to ruin your entire life and stop him / her.
quote:
Does this game acutally make sense?
It does.
quote:
And the gameplay, it's going to be way too easy.
Active stealth and thinking on your feet is going to be way too easy? Well, I guess we'll see. Wink2

I agree with you about one thing:

There are problems. However these are no problems that couldn't be solved with the right amount of information. Smile

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Vth_F_Smith_,


Sigs & Avatars | Terms of Use | My Blog | Patches & more | Vth_F | W[N]M | NORG

Xbox Live Gamer Tag: Vth F Smith
 
Posts: 3688 | Registered: Wed August 14 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
I really don't want to know everything when I start playing the game so I don't bother to think how Ubi ruined the game by not saying Lambert is there. I was too long in Bungie forum and knew too much of Halo3 when I started to play it, few things surpised or thrilled me. I try to avoid it now.

I want to see the game when I play it, not before. I see if Lambert is there, and what Sam is doing and can he do it.

There's actual problems too, but nothing severe to me, for now. Gameplay and story have balance and logic.

It's early.
 
Posts: 350 | Registered: Sat December 22 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
There's actual problems too, but nothing severe to me, for now. Gameplay and story have balance and logic.


The gameplay will be too easy in this game, because you can easily run into a building, fight some guards, and when too many come, you can switch to going stealthy. With this ability, you could fly through the game with no challenge. The storyline doesn't have balance, because there is no real objective, charactors are being dropped and some are still unknown if they're dead or alive. There isn't much logic either because the gameplay will be to easy and no one realy knows what is actually going on, because there has been no new releases of information because Ubi is proabably trying to fix the many problems. Also, There is realy no point to this game at all. Sam hasn't really done anything to make the U.S. intelliegece agencies come after him...
 
Posts: 194 | Registered: Tue May 15 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Do you really believe what you're saying?
Sounds more like FUD and hate towards the new direction than any logical critique against the game, your entire post is hearsay at best.

Wait and see what UBI is doing, THEN complain.
 
Posts: 901 | Registered: Mon October 28 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Shadow_Agent1:
quote:
There's actual problems too, but nothing severe to me, for now. Gameplay and story have balance and logic.


The gameplay will be too easy in this game, because you can easily run into a building, fight some guards, and when too many come, you can switch to going stealthy. With this ability, you could fly through the game with no challenge. The storyline doesn't have balance, because there is no real objective, charactors are being dropped and some are still unknown if they're dead or alive. There isn't much logic either because the gameplay will be to easy and no one realy knows what is actually going on, because there has been no new releases of information because Ubi is proabably trying to fix the many problems. Also, There is realy no point to this game at all. Sam hasn't really done anything to make the U.S. intelliegece agencies come after him...


Like in old games you could headshot, stab and frag every people as they approached you in dark. Many times it didn't work though, and it's not the soul of the game.

And the story part, jeez, have you played DA, or other games? Have you followed the story? I see nothing impossible in story. We see who is dead and who is not, and what are the reasons and solutions to Conviction. I don't want Ubi to tell the story now, I want to experience it when I play the game for the first time.

Like simu said, no sense.
 
Posts: 350 | Registered: Sat December 22 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
The problem with complaining afterwards, is that you've already paid 50 euros or more.


------------------------------
Project Stealth
 
Posts: 8714 | Registered: Sat January 17 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Splinter Cell & EndWar Moderator
Picture of Vth_F_Smith_
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by scworld:
The problem with complaining afterwards, is that you've already paid 50 euros or more.
Not necessarily.


Sigs & Avatars | Terms of Use | My Blog | Patches & more | Vth_F | W[N]M | NORG

Xbox Live Gamer Tag: Vth F Smith
 
Posts: 3688 | Registered: Wed August 14 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
It's better to complain about proven facts than speculations of might-bes and happens. Some great things can leave unhappened with it.

They can't show us everything even they wanted. Atleast I wouldn't want to see them, I want some surprises, good or bad.
 
Posts: 350 | Registered: Sat December 22 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
I suppose you're right... My appologies for being a little too blunt... It's just, I would really like to see this game be good, it's just I'm worried about the problems that are coming with it...

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Shadow_Agent1,
 
Posts: 194 | Registered: Tue May 15 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2 3 4 5 6  
 

ubi.com    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Splinter Cell  Hop To Forums  Splinter Cell ConViction    Why does the SC series have to be destroyed with Convction? Is there no alternative?

Terms of Use