I am for Industrial revolution... but the medieval Europe is both good and bad... good because well i like medieval and such... bad because u downgrade in knowledge, arcitecture, science, and weapons.

To all thoes people who are saying that it doesn't make sense to go back in time well to me it makes sense... Desmond went to Ezio because he was training...

He could go to the Medieval europe ancestor for another reason maybe to continue the Templars work in finding the POE to get them and destroy them.

quote:

Originally posted by Impulsez:
To all thoes people who are saying that it doesn't make sense to go back in time well to me it makes sense... Desmond went to Ezio because he was training...

I'm not arguing against going back in time, obviously. I'm just saying it doesn't make sense to go FARTHER back in time beyond the last benchmark. So in this case, it would seem kind of dumb to me to go back farther than the Renaissance.

what id they missed something? like on the DVD again u missed a pivotal chapter so u skip back to it and watch it, they could do that

or there is also the possibility no1 seem's to take into account, they could always side step. a family tree going back centuries will be massive and have people from different places at different times so it is possible they could go after memories from Ezio then learn of another assassin in a different part of the world at the same time (or similar time) as Ezio that they want to investigate.

what if Lucy is subject 16? I read in a article that Ezio also is the ancestore of 16, so wat if Lucy go's in the animus? or if you train with desmond trough the animus 2.0 you maby play in AC 3 as desmond jumping over the rooftops of new york or something

quote:

Originally posted by JorisGoedhuys:
what if Lucy is subject 16? I read in a article that Ezio also is the ancestore of 16, so wat if Lucy go's in the animus? or if you train with desmond trough the animus 2.0 you maby play in AC 3 as desmond jumping over the rooftops of new york or something

Ahem. Prototype.

they have said they don't want a shooter so modern day is pretty much a no go, and the animus is the central point of the story so they wont remove that from the game. so even tho they are training desmond you can assume it will only ever be for small side missions/distractions from the main story were everything will be carried out in close proximity to stop the need for major use of guns.

also from the amount of blood subject 16 used to do his drawings and such you can pretty much assume he is dead.

quote:

Originally posted by caswallawn_2k7:
they have said they don't want a shooter so modern day is pretty much a no go, and the animus is the central point of the story so they wont remove that from the game. so even tho they are training desmond you can assume it will only ever be for small side missions/distractions from the main story were everything will be carried out in close proximity to stop the need for major use of guns.

also from the amount of blood subject 16 used to do his drawings and such you can pretty much assume he is dead.

but in AC1 Lucy says that she's saved by vidic or something, and if they can make a animus in 2012 i bet they can do a bloodtransfusion in the hospital

trust me Lucy isn't subject 16, they kill the subjects when they are done with them. (or in the case of subject 16 he probably killed him self) Lucy is being held there because she knows how to fix the animus and make it work so she is kept there in a technical standpoint and if she was subject 16 and left those messages all over the lab they defiantly wouldn't let her interact with Desmond.

also just a point, you use eagle vision to see the blood that glows red, now in the main game red = nasty so doesn't this mean that subject 16 was actually against what Desmond wants?

quote:

also just a point, you use eagle vision to see the blood that glows red, now in the main game red = nasty so doesn't this mean that subject 16 was actually against what Desmond wants?

i think not because blood is red and ubisoft wanted to show the people that it is written in blood (the truth is written in blood)

Yea modern day AC is never going to happen, since we have prototype, infamous, and soon the saboteur which is based in world war 2 Paris.

If I had to guess, I'd go for the age of enlightenment which was 18th century I think.

Fitting for this game I think anyway.

quote:

Originally posted by caswallawn_2k7:
they have said they don't want a shooter so modern day is pretty much a no go...

Please don't take this the wrong way, but this is the millionth time I've seen this and it makes me want to bash my face into a wall every single time I see it. So everything I say below is not directed at you personally, just everyone else that's said it as well. XD

There are *other ways* to kill people in the present day. @_@ There are spies all over the world that dig up information and kill people who need to be killed every day, and they don't only use guns. There's a spy museum in Washington D.C. that has all sorts of amazing little devices for any and all needs--from bugging to hiding to murder. If they wanted to do something for the modern day, they could easily pull influences from that.

Metal Gear Solid isn't a shooter. You can play it *like* a shooter, but that's ultimately not what the game is about, and (with the exception of MGS4) it punishes you for doing so. Anyone remember that battle with The Sorrow in MGS3? Well, I bet you did if you decided to go on a killing spree and had to sit through 20 minutes of wading through corpses and avoiding ghosts.

Granted, while they do it completely differently, Assassin's Creed and Metal Gear Solid both rely on a stealth factor in their gameplay. How closely you want to stick to the word 'stealth' is entirely up to you, the player.

There could be present-day missions wherein, should Desmond need to assassinate anyone (if the game should happen to be set in present day), they could be set up similar to the way that one mission we've seen before in AC2 is--assassinate your target while meeting certain stipulations. One of such stipulations could be to kill without the use of a gun.

To think that murder can only be committed with your hands, knife or a gun is rather limited, I think. If they do set it in modern day, not only could it be a cool opportunity to have some sweet pseudo-spy toys, but those toys could really introduce some interesting game mechanics, as well.

Assassin's creed 3
i've read somewhere that the developers think to make desmond the one assassin =O but i am pretty sure this will be an epic fail because 21th sentury have guns,nukes and other ****s that in 11th and 15th sentury doesn't has =\

and to keep to that style of game play you lose the free running and exploration aspect of the game, as in the present day if some1 was to start running over roof top's after killing some1 they would have a helicopter up and marksmen. the police aren't just going to say oh well he's just killed some1 every1 get their night sticks out since we want to give him a chance in close combat

I don't like the idea of guns in AC2 so to have it in modern day would ruin it for me and besides if they were due this I think it would clash with splinter cell

Ubisoft are way to smart to let that happen

Hey I think the best plot twist would be to have a guy who wakes up a 1000 years (3012+) in the future who lives through Desmond's memories as he relives the life of Altair and Ezio.

I'd love to see a game like that. Plus they could have a world that could have gone through an apocalypse where guns aren't used any more and the animus is just a helmet that fits on the guys head.

quote:

Originally posted by TxL7833:
Hey I think the best plot twist would be to have a guy who wakes up a 1000 years (3012+) in the future who lives through Desmond's memories as he relives the life of Altair and Ezio.

That would make no sense. They might as well jump to Altair and Ezio straight away if they want to see those bits. And if they don't, they would've fast forwarded those parts of Desmond's memory, because they wouldn't be relevant to what they're looking for.

I think that they might do a first assassin ever type of character. Like the first founder of the Hashashin or just the person who first thought of using assassination as a means of killing people. So it might be set in extreme ancient times like during the early greek civilization(Minoans).

welcome to the forum

Yeah probably not the best idea to go to 3012.

*Spoiler warning*



There is an achievements where you have to escape the assassins hideout where Lucy take you so I don't really know where the game could be set, Ubisoft might need to make a new animus 3.0 .