Assassins creed should not be just a trilogy, this game is very good idea. Must make best use and protect as many parts.I want to play next Assassins Creed 3 with the action in Ancient Rome, Roman emperors http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Empire the time (Julius Caesar) http:/ / en.wikipedia.org / wiki / Julius_Caesar, the gladiators, the wars of the Romans. Many games that had nothing to say they had many sequels, the idea of this game should not stop at more 3.
Considering that the active AC3 topic was closed, it might just be worth it to bring this one to the top before a new thread gets started for it. (because this was the most recent one without a padlock) If I'm wrong, then I'm sorry and a padlock should solve the problem.
So if this topic is allowed to continue, please don't start talking about a woman assassin in WW2. It's been pointed out by forum members, and Atmon himself, that a developer was being misquoted and that was the cause of all those articles talking about WW2 as if it were confirmed as the next time period.
P.S. Xanatos, I'm the one who's been playing with you necromancer's codex.
"If you're ever in a fair fight, then your tactics suck." Outside it may be raining & cold but our insides are still a warm tangle of blood, tissue & organs. May the Frog of Fun come off his toadstool of merriment and hop often through your day.
The timeframe has advanced to far to be in Roman times, but I think it would be fun to have pre WW1 Britain. Possibly a time during the Age of Exploration?
Well y'know, I guess if we're going by technical definition, Assassin's Creed isn't really a trilogy, considering we have Altair's Chronicles (which may or may not count, depending on who you ask, LOL), Bloodlines, and Discovery.
And chances are, by the time AC3 rolls around, we'll probably get at least one more game based off of the AC2 storyline for a portable system.
While I think it would be awesome if they just kept making console games for Assassin's Creed, I doubt they would. :[ And to set it in Ancient Rome wouldn't exactly be consistent, considering that that time period was about 1000 years before the *first* AC game.
Personally, I'd like to see an AC game set in America/an Allied nation during the WWII time period, but without a focus on the actual battles (omfg, there was more stuff going on than shooting people in the face?! HOLY COW~~). WWI would be pretty cool, too. They could have Teddy Roosevelt in the game. Then I'd have to hope they'd get Robin Williams to play him, haha.
NO kid i m not a troll.. i was just posting my opinion like everybody else.. I wasnt even talking to you or about u :S... but now i am gonna give u millions of reasons why there should be no female protanogist for AC.. the reasons are............ Comments Removed
This message has been edited. Last edited by: Realjambo,
I think it should take place in Yonaguni couse it's a lost civilization and they can do what ever they want with it for example people say it isn't good to go back before AC2 cause now they have banking system and it would be a big step back but with Yonaguni they can justmake up a banking system and more they can do whatever they want
NO kid i m not a troll.. i was just posting my opinion like everybody else.. I wasnt even talking to you or about u :S... but now i am gonna give u millions of reasons why there should be no female protanogist for AC.. the reasons are............
Hmm? But keepth3beat had very reasonable suggestions.
This message has been edited. Last edited by: Realjambo,
...Do I have a stalker now? I'm almost curious to see how long that post was before it was edited. LOL.
Anyway.
quote:
Originally posted by moqqy: Shooting them in the stomach?
Exactly. I'm so glad someone *finally* understands...! ;P
But in all seriousness, I think America would be a really fun setting from the 1920s - 1940s. Not only because of the spike in immigration (we could possibly follow Desmond's grandparents into America), but also because America itself had so much character during that time period, what with the two wars in less than 40 years, the great depression, and the sudden surge in the economy and patriotism.
So focusing on the social aspects of the war(s) would be pretty cool for this sort of game, I think.
There isn't really a good time period in American history that fits well for an AC game. Well, I guess there may be a few. But there are a lot of better ones in other parts of the world.
"If you're ever in a fair fight, then your tactics suck." Outside it may be raining & cold but our insides are still a warm tangle of blood, tissue & organs. May the Frog of Fun come off his toadstool of merriment and hop often through your day.
True, American history may be a bit awkward to suddenly throw in there, considering. And in all honesty, I think they're probably just going to have the third one entirely in the 'present day' anyway, but... where's the fun in discussing and theorizing that? XD
Assassins creed will never go past WW1, if it does, it just isn't an assassins creed game. Nor will it ever have alot of guns, so i doubt it will ever go past the 1800s even
Cas, Jack was not an assassin and the Templars did not disguise themselves as prostitutes.
"If you're ever in a fair fight, then your tactics suck." Outside it may be raining & cold but our insides are still a warm tangle of blood, tissue & organs. May the Frog of Fun come off his toadstool of merriment and hop often through your day.
