ATI HD2600XT

eVGA GeForce 8800 Ultra

Asus EAH3870X2

Palit 8800GT 512

No problems either.

8800 GTX
Runs fine at 1600x1200x72hz, all details set to highest. Get occational drop in framerates when leaping from towers.

Used with AMD 4800 x2 (939), 2GB DDR, X-fi, win XP.

XFX Nvidia 8800GTX. Great card as I couldn't justify spending £400 on the 9800GX2.

ATI Radeon 2600 HD (which seems incompatible at this point).

ATI Radeon X1650 PRO (256MB GDDR3)

Game at 1024x768@60
Multisampling: 1/3
Shadows: 2/3
Post-FX: on
Graphics quality: 3/4
Level of detail: 3/4

The framerate is certainly acceptable, but the CPU lacks in capacity (Single core Athlon 3800+) so I am buying a dual-core soon (probably 4800+).

PowerColor ATI Radeon HD 3870 XT Extreme 512MB.

Game at 1400x900
Multisampling: 2/3
Post-FX: On
Shadows: 3/3
Graphics quality: 4/4
Level of detail: 4/4
Vsync: On

Running like a dream.

Two Asus EN9600GT's with 512 MB RAM in SLI. But not in Damascus, SLI gives a BSOD there.

Game runs smoothly on 1650x1080, all graphical options at max.

GeForce Go 7600 in a Toshiba Qosmio. Game loads to tutorial, where it suffers a sad and horrible death and kills the system

I am using ATI x1650 512-RAM AGP; which means I can't play Assassin's Creed since it doesn't support the AGP version of x1650. I was actually gonna buy the game today, but having learned my lesson from the Splinter Cell: Double Agent incident, I checked the minimum requirements on the box, and realized that my PC couldn't run the game.

On a previous occasion I had foolishly bought Double Agent without checking the minimum requirements. I had always assumed that my system could run any game at least on low settings. But Ubisoft had , for some reason, decided that Double Agent would only support shader 3.0 (which my graphics card at that time did not support), despite the fact that at that time the majority of PC users had shader 2.0 enabled graphics cards.

And now with the release of the PC version of Assassin's Creed Ubisoft has, for some reason, decided to exclude my AGP graphics card. I find this quite puzzling since recent PC releases continue to support AGP cards. My card still manages to give adequate performance. I mean come on, I have finished Crysis with this card on low/medium settings (it ran smoothly most of the time). If Crysis, the perfomance-demanding-nightmare of every PC in the market, can run with this card; why not Assassin's Creed I ask!?

I was actually looking forward to playing this game. Oh well...

ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro 512mb
Not being smug or anything but it seems to work ok for me

Dual x1950XTX's

GeForce 7950GT

Ati Radeon X1600 PCIe Hypermemory 512mb

XFX 8800GTS 640 (G80)

ATI Radeon X1950 Pro 512MB

Runs on full, no worries

EVGA e-GeForce 9600 GT SSC

GeForce 8400M GS, on a laptop. Very playable on low quality, enough for me.