Originally posted by XxCH0NGxX:
quote:
Originally posted by Silver-Hawk-Red:
quote:
Originally posted by XxCH0NGxX:
quote:
Originally posted by PvtSkwerl:
quote:
Originally posted by XxCH0NGxX:
quote:
Originally posted by Silver-Hawk-Red:
quote:
Originally posted by XxCH0NGxX:
quote:
Originally posted by Silver-Hawk-Red:
quote:
Originally posted by XxCH0NGxX:
This poll is very simple. Sim or Arcade.
So the entire premise of your assumption is the fact that weaponry may or may not reload on an aircraft's pylons make it a Simulator or Arcade, much less Simucade? Me thinks you need to get your head out of your 4th point of contact.
Flight envelopes, Pilot effects and Mission profiles decide the main factor of realism to me. If my F-14D can respawn weaponry on it's hard-points then whoop-dee-do.
How about you learn to interpret things. What I put after sim and arcade were examples, not to be taken as the only thing that makes a game sim or arcade. Seems to me, that you are the one who needs to take your head out of your 4th point of contact.
I thinks you should cease with the Cop-outs and back pedalling before you become so much the fool, (if you haven't already).
Where's the option : "I just want a good game?"
There's no sense in arguing with you about this.
Go get back on the short bus, and return to your special class. You still have alot of work to do.
You do know when you reserve your arguments to personal insults, you have lost the argument, right?
He had a misconception of the poll, and I corrected his false theory. That was the end of the real arguement. The rest was foolish insults on both sides.
Misconception? Please, you knew full well that such an undescriptive poll was going to draw fire and trying to duck out of it by insulting me is not helping matters.
If you want to contest my opinion legitly, I'm all for it, but you lost the second you had to lay out the insults.
Yes a misconception on your part is right. You are, so far, the first person on here who has tried argue that the poll is not descriptive enough. I haven't seen anyone else complain about it being too undescriptive. It is your problem if you cannot interpret an example as being an example.
You want to base the winning or losing of the arguement on insults? Well, then you lost when you started the arguement since you threw out the first insult. Here, I'll quote it for you in case you forgot....."Me thinks you need to get your head out of your 4th point of contact." That was the first insult of the arguement. That was said by you. You lost from the get-go. I don't mind someone challenging my poll, and the contents of the poll. I don't mind at all. However, if someone speculates my choice of words on the poll, followed by an insult, they will get retaliation from me. I will throw back insults, if initially thrown at me. If you can't handle it, then leave this topic. I have stopped the insults, and I will refrain from any further insults. The insults are done, unless you want throw out anymore. At which case, I ask a moderator to lock the thread, or remove you from the forum.
As far as the arguement of the contents of the poll, I have explained my reasoning for putting in one example and not putting in more. If I was able to change the wording on it, to satisfy your lack of understanding, I would gladly do so. However, the forum will not allow me to change anything on the poll, so it stays as is.
Everyone here understands, that what is in parenthases, is only ONE example of the difference between a SIM and an ARCADE style game. It's not that hard to figure out. If anyone else has a problem understanding it, let me know, and I will further explain the poll. I do not have a problem with that. Do not question the poll with insults like Silver-Hawk-Red did, for it will only spark another insult arguement. I will not receive insults with out dishing them back out. You throw a punch at me, I'll throw one right back at you.
