I would like if everything graw1&2 were forgotten and no trace of them would be present in GR4.

quote:

Originally posted by bazzam1974:
(when your dead your dead )since they added party chat pleople leave their body's where they die and don't respawn just to use their cam to tell their team where you are!
the cam should change as soon as you see your man die and hit the deck
if not whats the point of turning off the kill cam

I kinda like it since I'm sly and a insidious bugger.
I run over the guy I shoot, making shore the dead guy on the ground can see me when I hide behind a bush.
Then look back and wait until the body "disappear" then run back and hide in a new place opposite to the first one.

Then the dead guy tell his mate;
- Right then, I was shot near the Pagoda and the guy is hiding behind the bush to the right of me.
He-he-he!
Guess what, he's team-mate Daft-Darren comes all guns blazing at the bush where I was hiding in the first place.
SMACK!
Single shot in the back of the head at Daft-Darren

Run 'n Gunners, predictable, vulnerable like shooting fish in a barrel...

Hum all this sounded better in Swedish.

I almost said: Bring back Serellan!! 'cause I'm more that slightly nervous about how the game is gonna be without him at the wheel

But I'll go for this: Sort out the sniper rifles (especially the 50 cals.) so the recoil is realistic and people can't use them as shotguns! (I was shocked when I came on GRAW II and realised this was'nt fixed )

quote:

Originally posted by Dirtymurph:
I would like if everything graw1&2 were forgotten and no trace of them would be present in GR4.

This sounds VERY interesting to LOL.. bring back the good'ol days before Ghost Recon 2 even!

Make the PC version just like the console version and use GAMES FOR WINDOWS LIVE supporting cross platform play (i.e. Xbox 360 players vs PC players).

Allow the host/server to filter gamers by platform (i.e. bar them from joining the game) in case he doesn't want the two worlds to mix. This filter is turned on by default.

Well Kimi, asking is a good idea, but as you can see, the number of responses is small, 24, befor this one with 564 views from the console page and 611 from the PC page.

The low number of responses is indicative of the way Ubi treats it's games and how it presents them. The forums die when there is nothing being talked about for a game (the iL2 forums notwithstanding, that game hasn't been corrupted or FUBARed) as far as development or any possible features.

That, combined with the disdain many gamers are feeling towards Ubi for messing up a good thing, has really decreased the number of people who are active on the forums for such questions as you posed in this thread. It is not a good way to do business when the company is in the entertainment business.

Maybe one day Ubi will wake up and smell the coffee, but I seriously doubt it. Maybe when they are facing bankruptcy will they realize that they need to interact with their customers more beside the support line and having them send them to the dead forums.

Like i said before ,remove UBI

Get rid of 3rd person view. It is at the root of what has been wrong with this game since gr2.

Make the players connection bar or speed visible in the multi-player lobby.

Weapon Customization. Start with base weapons and allow the user to add optics,foregrips,launcher and stocks. maybe even different barrels or upper receivers to applicable weapons such as the LWRC SABR or the Magpul Masada.

adaptive Friendly AI that can operate tacticaly not just in URban operations but also in CQB/room clearing and rural combat. The Current SP squad control is great for Urban Enviroments but I wish the squad could move in formation with me.

quote:

Originally posted by Gr.Junkie:
Get rid of 3rd person view. It is at the root of what has been wrong with this game since gr2.

That kinda kills the "tactical" aspect of multi-player mode, turn it into a Run 'n Gun session.
If I want that I go for COD or HALO.

Hiding in the grass in Swamp Airfield 'n all you'd see is grass in your 42"LCD.

SAS... to make it more realistic in first person, you should be able to lay prone in the grass... BUT RAISE YOUR HEAD TO SEE! Of course, that would make you more visible for a moment but that's where the whole "tactical" part comes in.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: beonder13,

The first person view in cod and halo
is not what makes them arcade "run n gun"
shooters.
I could go on but this is not the thread
for that.

While reading some of these ideas I ALMOST, for an entire second believed that they would actually be considered.

quote:

Originally posted by beonder13:
SAS... to make it more realistic in first person, you should be able to lay prone in the grass... BUT RAISE YOUR READ TO SEE! Of course, that would make you more visible for a moment but that's where the whole "tactical" part comes in.

Oh c'mon it's great fun seeing around corners, over boulders and bushes.
Hum... You have a point, not too realistic seeing around corners then huh!?
Hoddamnit, took forever to get use to the OSV 'n now go back to FPV.
I'm an old dog, hard time learning new tricks.

quote:

Originally posted by Gr.Junkie:
The first person view in cod and halo
is not what makes them arcade "run n gun"
shooters.
I could go on but this is not the thread
for that.

Ya right!
I do love to Run 'n Gun, especially on the Roof Tops, Mining Camp, Roadblock Prison 'n Nowhere.

Just keep the option for both, plain and simple. Removing one or the other is just going to tick people off on both sides.

Personally I don't mind either. But neither are flawless. OTS seeing around corners and such and FPV having to stick half your body out just to see.

Ghillie Suit.
M24 wrapped in burlap like in OGR/GRIT.(would go great with the ghillie suit )

SASIncrement:
"That (1st person) kinda kills the 'tactical' aspect of multi-player mode, turn it into a Run 'n Gun session.
If I want that I go for COD or HALO."

I totally agree. Although I realise the magical see round corners thing is silly, it does mean you've got to be careful when running about. It sort of makes up for lack of 'subtle movements' and proper camo.

1st person views are ok but they do tend to encourage run n gun, alongside other common aspects that are almost inherent in fps's.

i don't think we should drop either, just make 3rd person a little less magical, and improve 1st person with a gun sight.

as for one thing i'd like to see added/removed, i can't make up my mind. there is a lot i'd like to see improved, or more specifically, brought up to date. there is also a lot i don't want to see added. If I was forced, I might say slightly more specialised classes (e.g. sniper), that would fit nicely with general improvements like more interesting and varied maps.