ubi.com    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  1C:Maddox Games  Hop To Forums  IL2 Off Topic    A present for Low_Flyer_KmIX
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Picture of AndyJWest
Posted


What do you think, LF?

(Can I also draw the attention of readers to my earlier 'Boeing 71-B' drawing here)
 
Posts: 1575 | Registered: Sat July 11 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Low_Flyer_MkIX
Posted Hide Post
Nooooooooooooo!





"I was working on this skin for a week, and you
post a picture of a damn turd right in my thread!"
 
Posts: 2876 | Registered: Tue October 23 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Low_Flyer_MkIX
Posted Hide Post



"I was working on this skin for a week, and you
post a picture of a damn turd right in my thread!"
 
Posts: 2876 | Registered: Tue October 23 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
I am sure the modders can do this.
Even 1C could put it in to IL-2 '49.
As soon as you put on a landing gear.
 
Posts: 2796 | Registered: Wed February 23 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of The_Stealth_Owl
Posted Hide Post
It is a pluasible design. It would spin out though at low speeds.



Being British is about driving in a German car to an Irish pub for a Belgian beer, then grabbing an Indian curry or a Turkish kebab on the way home, to sit on Swedish furniture and watch American shows on a Japanese TV.
 
Posts: 888 | Registered: Thu August 13 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of DrHerb
Posted Hide Post
Looks like something that would be in Crimson Skies.



Proudly Flying on Hyperlobby as _AH_Prop http://aceshigh.ws/forum/index.php
 
Posts: 1744 | Registered: Thu November 10 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of AndyJWest
Posted Hide Post
Hum, methinks the CG will be too far forward. I'm going to have to turn the engines round, move them back a bit, and fit pusher props.

It also needs more side area aft of the CG, so I'll extend the fuselage back a few feet, and enlarge the fin. Only trouble is, it will look less like its illustrious ancestor.

The test pilot is insisting on an ejector seat, and I think he may have a point - those props could give him a nasty whack if he was to jump....
 
Posts: 1575 | Registered: Sat July 11 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of The_Stealth_Owl
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Hum, methinks the CG will be too far forward. I'm going to have to turn the engines round, move them back a bit, and fit pusher props.



It looks the most pluasible right now, considering that you think that it is front heavy, well, the engines and wing are in the back, with the engines going forward; it looks correct now.


Give me the lengh and witdth and the wieght and the aspect ratio and whatever els you have an I will calculate the CoG.


The only thing it needs improvment on is the pilot needs a ladder to get to his cockpit, the forward stabilzers would be better swept, and the tailfin needs to be extended.


The forward stabilizers shoiuld also have vertical fins at teh ends.

I draw aircraft designs all day at school, then when I get home I make scale models out of whatever. I have made designs like this before.



Being British is about driving in a German car to an Irish pub for a Belgian beer, then grabbing an Indian curry or a Turkish kebab on the way home, to sit on Swedish furniture and watch American shows on a Japanese TV.
 
Posts: 888 | Registered: Thu August 13 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of The_Stealth_Owl
Posted Hide Post
Actually, judging by the its looks, I'd say it has a low aspect ratio. Not as low as...lets say a concord.



Being British is about driving in a German car to an Irish pub for a Belgian beer, then grabbing an Indian curry or a Turkish kebab on the way home, to sit on Swedish furniture and watch American shows on a Japanese TV.
 
Posts: 888 | Registered: Thu August 13 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of AndyJWest
Posted Hide Post
I'm not really sure where the CG should be in a canard, but I'd guess that it would be around the mainplane leading edge with a layout like this.

In case anyone thinks this is utterly bonkers, I refer them to the Miles Libellula:

 
Posts: 1575 | Registered: Sat July 11 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
lets say a concord.


Let's not say "a concord". Or if you mean something else but the plane "Concorde" (yes, a Capital C, and an e at the end), ignore this comment. Wink2

Second, that wing is definitely not a low-aspect ratio wing. An easy way to calculate aspect ration is:
wingspan^2 / wing area = aspect ratio

which gives the Whirlwind (or Whindwirl..windwhilrerer.. whatever) a ratio of 8.18, which is pretty high for a WWII fighter. Some planes, e.g. F6F (5.50), P-47 (5.53), Tempest (5.57), A6M (5.63-6.43), Fw 190 (6.04), etc. had a much lower aspect ratio. Only WWII fighter with a higher aspect ratio than Whirly might be the P-38, with 8.26.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Redguys Air Racing Team
Member A4
www.simairracing.com

"The fastest pilots of the online world..."
 
Posts: 175 | Registered: Sat May 31 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Ba5tard5word
Posted Hide Post
The Ascender aka Assender:



-----------------
Farewell to freedom in the Adriatic and to the days of wild abandon.
Check out my BRAND NEW campaign, "The Pirate Menace"
Also check out my old Air Pirates campaigns!
Air Pirates Part One
Air Pirates Part Two
 
Posts: 2167 | Registered: Tue February 12 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of AndyJWest
Posted Hide Post
quote:
The Ascender aka Assender:

Ugly, if you ask me...

Interesting though.
 
Posts: 1575 | Registered: Sat July 11 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Eww! Ick! Ptoo! Ahhhh! Keep it away!
 
Posts: 790 | Registered: Sun November 02 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Feathered_IV
Posted Hide Post
Oh you are awful...



***********************************************



"Nineteen years of age, eight years public education, three years military service. Intelligent, normally observant and answered all questions freely. He was arrogant and proud to be a pilot. Fellow prisoners in hospital consider him mentally unstable."
 
Posts: 4784 | Registered: Mon April 05 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 2  
 

ubi.com    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  1C:Maddox Games  Hop To Forums  IL2 Off Topic    A present for Low_Flyer_KmIX

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy