quote:

Originally posted by raaaid:
well outlaw probably you are educated but not very smart, you proved it to me in the barometric semivacuum concept where an unuducated person corrected you

I was wrong one time so I'm not very smart? Count the number of times you have been forced to say you were wrong on this board and compare.

quote:

Originally posted by raaaid:
you know what im not building this engine, its so easy it must have been done before but supressed, see schauberger, im not that crazy

If it's so easy then why won't you show the equations of motion? <------ Answer this simple question genius

quote:

Originally posted by raaaid:
i rather prefer to work on my enlightening systeem via sync of both brain hemis

That would be a good idea. It fits well with the weed you admit to smoking all the time.

quote:

Originally posted by raaaid:
that can be a hit to this nazi system where third world countries are now dead camps

You mean that one day I won't have to live in fear of the oil police? Thank you raaaid for saving us all.

quote:

Originally posted by raaaid:
can you imagine a world where everybody can scan everybodies mind,dogs will turn on their owners, vengeance is better served cold

Mind scans, dogs turning on their owners, and cold vengeance all in the same sentence. Stephen King is the epitome of normalcy compared to you.

--Outlaw.

YEP I COULD BE A SUCCESFULL WRITTer, you enjoy reading my posts or arguing with me

quote:

Originally posted by raaaid:
YEP I COULD BE A SUCCESFULL WRITTer, you enjoy reading my posts or arguing with me

I reiterate, why won't you post the equations of motion for your system? That qualifies as writing.

--Outlaw.

if i make a free body diagram i MUST put a reaction for every action, so i cant prove a reactionless force

evrytime im proved wrong i admitt it but most times it happens to you you run away, it would be more fun discuss with you if you didnt do that

youve been so far the only person here whos understood a mass in an inwards spiral pulls more than a mass in an outwards one so you must be smarter than the average bear

you argued that the strong pull lasts less than the weak one so forces are balanced, let me prove you wrong and hell id love to be proved wrong in this idea, is kind of a responsability to be the only one who understands gravity

i have a planet orbiting the sun at a distance of 1k m at 100k m/s at the perihelium and 100k m on the aphelium at 1k m/s

will both halves from perihelium to aphelium last the same?

what then about my example with a mass with a 1 m radius at 100 m/s in the perihelium and 100m radius at 1 m/s at the aphelium

will both half from peri to aphe last the same?

then i have a weak pull that lasts as much as the strong pull, you got propulsion and if is caused by the electrons gravity, and free energy that explains why the moon orbits higher every time

anyway as i grew watching images of kids from ethiopia that unlike me had swollen stomachs i will do something about it and this is not the thing, already done by schuaberger who got murdered and didnt change a thing

the thing is my invention to sync both brain hemis, it works ive been 3 times close to enlightening, i got to have peripheral view as clear as central one for 1 second but got distracted, and you know what it only works when i stop having weed, funny

if i achieve enlightening with it ill spread it mouth by mouth and have the whole world enlinghtened, what could you do with full control of your brain

quote:

Originally posted by raaaid:
if i make a free body diagram i MUST put a reaction for every action, so i cant prove a reactionless force

So what you're saying is that even though EVERY SINGLE CORRECT APPLICATION OF PHYSICS TODAY PRODUCES VALID, ACCURATE, AND VERIFIABLE RESULTS, IT'S ALL WRONG? <------ Answer

Is it just luck that buildings and bridges are still standing (with the occasional exception due to incorrectly sized gusset plates and terrorists)? <------ Answer

How is it possible for me to continue to drive my vehicles with all the engineering calculations behind it wrong? <------ Answer

What about the 72" diameter stainless steel flue gas duct with 1100 degree burner exhaust cruising through it that I just put into service? If physics is all wrong, why is it still hanging where I put it (mostly)? <------ Answer

How about the turbine that exhaust is driving at 3600 rpm? What's keeping it together? Luck again? <------ Answers

quote:

Originally posted by raaaid:
evrytime im proved wrong i admitt it but most times it happens to you you run away, it would be more fun discuss with you if you didnt do that

If you're referring to the case of the water column, I wasn't proven wrong, I realized I was wrong after Gunz' post. Proof would have been the calculations showing the drop in height. Furthermore, I did not run away, I got the flaming 5n1t5 which kept me in the can for 2 days and then I left for 4 days in Mexico (I realize the irony in the order of those events). When I returned, the thread was barely on the second page so I chose not to resurrect it from the dead.

quote:

Originally posted by raaaid:
youve been so far the only person here whos understood a mass in an inwards spiral pulls more than a mass in an outwards one so you must be smarter than the average bear

First, while I am smarter than the average bear, that's not much of an accomplishment.

Second, aside from gravity, the mass is NOT "pulling" on anything. The "pull" is the REACTION due to the expenditure of energy to decrease its radius.

quote:

Originally posted by raaaid:
you argued that the strong pull lasts less than the weak one so forces are balanced, let me prove you wrong and hell id love to be proved wrong in this idea, is kind of a responsability to be the only one who understands gravity

i have a planet orbiting the sun at a distance of 1k m at 100k m/s at the perihelium and 100k m on the aphelium at 1k m/s

will both halves from perihelium to aphelium last the same?

what then about my example with a mass with a 1 m radius at 100 m/s in the perihelium and 100m radius at 1 m/s at the aphelium

will both half from peri to aphe last the same?

then i have a weak pull that lasts as much as the strong pull, you got propulsion and if is caused by the electrons gravity, and free energy that explains why the moon orbits higher every time

Totally wrong. As I said previously, based on the direction of desired travel, I used a different cutting plane than you did. This cutting plane makes it obvious that, EVEN IF ELLIPTICAL MOTION IS ASSUMED, the time is different. There was no need to argue anything else b/c using the cutting plane I chose the result is obvious. Note that this is the second time I've noted this and you are still arguing the "same time" point. It's a moot point now b/c I now realize that we were using different cutting planes. STOP ARGUING THE SAME TIME CARP.

With your choice of cutting plane and the ASSUMPTION of elliptical motion then you may be correct, the time across the axis of symmetry may be the same.

However, you are ASSUMING elliptical motion. <--------- THIS IS NOT A VALID ASSUMPTION

Unless, of course, you prove it. Proving it is a simple matter of deriving the equations of motion yet you refuse to do this? Why do you refuse to do so? Why won't you show your calculations? As I said before, a crudely scrawled sketch of stick figures DOES NOT PROVE ANYTHING.

Now, you continue to bring Kepler's laws into the mix and as I stated before, those laws apply to MASSES UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF GRAVITY ALONE.

AS I STATED BEFORE...

Your sketch shows constant forces acting on the masses. GRAVITY DOES NOT EXERT A CONSTANT FORCE.

Please explain WHY Kepler's laws govern your system when the forces are not gravitational in nature nor do they equal those that WOULD be applied by gravity? <------ Answer

quote:

Originally posted by raaaid:
anyway as i grew watching images of kids from ethiopia that unlike me had swollen stomachs i will do something about it and this is not the thing, already done by schuaberger who got murdered and didnt change a thing

the thing is my invention to sync both brain hemis, it works ive been 3 times close to enlightening, i got to have peripheral view as clear as central one for 1 second but got distracted, and you know what it only works when i stop having weed, funny

Yet you still smoke weed? <------ Answer

According to you this "enlightenment" is the single most world changing "invention" the world will ever see and you are mere seconds away from it but you won't quit smoking weed long enough to achieve it? <------ Answer

And I thought I was selfish for driving a car that only gets 9 mpg.

quote:

Originally posted by raaaid:
if i achieve enlightening with it ill spread it mouth by mouth and have the whole world enlinghtened, what could you do with full control of your brain

I wonder, exactly WHAT do you believe this "enlightening" will do for the world and how will it do it? <------ Answer

Also, can I use it to fix the roof on my house for less than the estimated $1400? <------ Answer

Will it improve my ability to design the facilities that produce things like fuels, polyethylene, Nylon, and silicon wafers? <------ Answer

By "improve" my ability I really mean will I be able to do nothing but still charge the client for it.

Even more important than both of those, what about the brakes on my Vette. The brakes are pretty much "enlightened" as it is. What they really need is a good "enheavying".

If I were to become "enlightened" by your method, could I fix the brakes without replacing the power booster? <------ Answer

--Outlaw.

P.S.
I think I might be pretty close to enlightenment myself as the client just paid $125 ($61.68 of which is now mine - before taxes) for me to write this post. It's not technically doing "nothing" but it's pretty freakin' close.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Outlaw---,

then if both half spiral last the same, along the peri aphe axe, and the inwards spiral pulls more than the outwards that creates a thrust and explains gravity

whats wrong about this? seems correct to me

You either did not read, or did not understand anything I posted nor will you ever so just go smoke some more weed.

--Outlaw.

just gotta throw this in....watchin you guys argue frikin makes my day

Glad I could help. Being a participant makes my day go faster.

--Outlaw.

quote:

However, you are ASSUMING elliptical motion. <--------- THIS IS NOT A VALID ASSUMPTION

this is the only point of yours i dindt touch, though im talking of half inwards half outwards spiral, any, a ellipse just happen to belong to this kind

with the spool i can make the cannonball go any trajectory i want, i just make it go on an ellipse, like a looping yoyo

there was a missunderstanding about the cuting plane that divides each half, it had to be cleared up

think it was the only reason cause you considered my idea bad but now that point aint valid any more

i cant make the equations cause i havent passed physics yet

why i believe my system sweep equal areaas in equal times? planets follow cons of angular momentum, my system as well, then my system sweep equal areas in equal times, you already admitted it both halfs last the same, and thats because both halves have the same area

i think it was important to clarify the cutting plane goes from peri to aphe, because each half divided py this plane pulls with different force, you already admitted this

i think this is a much more rational explanation for gravity than weird bent space

quote:

Originally posted by raaaid:

quote:

However, you are ASSUMING elliptical motion. <--------- THIS IS NOT A VALID ASSUMPTION

this is the only point of yours i dindt touch, though im talking of half inwards half outwards spiral, any, a ellipse just happen to belong to this kind

No it's not! You missed MOST of my questions. Are you freakin' blind or do you need to burn another one so you can concentrate?

quote:

Originally posted by raaaid:
with the spool i can make the cannonball go any trajectory i want, i just make it go on an ellipse, like a looping yoyo

True, BUT NOT WITH THE FORCES YOU SHOW ON YOUR SKETCH -- UNLESS YOU PROVE IT. Why do you not read my posts?

quote:

Originally posted by raaaid:
there was a missunderstanding about the cuting plane that divides each half, it had to be cleared up

think it was the only reason cause you considered my idea bad but now that point aint valid any more

You should STOP THINKING BECAUSE IT AIN'T WORKIN' FOR YOU.

quote:

Originally posted by raaaid:
i cant make the equations cause i havent passed physics yet

Then your theory is total carp. I mean utter garbage. Hablo Espanol solo un pequeno so I can't speak for that language but I do know that the English language can not adequately express how pathetically useless and worthless your theory is. I dare say that it is a travesty of justice for you to devalue the paper you use to make those sketches.

quote:

Originally posted by raaaid:
why i believe my system sweep equal areaas in equal times? planets follow cons of angular momentum, my system as well, then my system sweep equal areas in equal times, you already admitted it both halfs last the same, and thats because both halves have the same area

I did NOT admit that. Why are you lying about what I said?

You do this often.

quote:

Originally posted by raaaid:
i think it was important to clarify the cutting plane goes from peri to aphe, because each half divided py this plane pulls with different force, you already admitted this

This is a half lie b/c I qualified my statement. Once again, stop lying.

quote:

Originally posted by raaaid:
i think this is a much more rational explanation for gravity than weird bent space

That's funny, you talking about rationality.

Don't you think that between the weed and the schizophrenia you are the last person that should be talking about rationality?

If you want to continue, READ MY POST AND ANSWER ALL THE QUESTIONS. Also, stop LYING about what I posted.


--Outlaw.


[edit]
For your convenience I have now added a "<------ Answer" beacon at each of the places in my post where there is a question. Maybe this will make up for the fact that my keyboard doesn't have an upside down "?" for the beginning of sentences.
[end edit]

i have no schizo but you probably are a socialized psycho, 1 for evey four, im delusional which is quite different

anyway you are not constructive so i end my talk here, you like the rest dont give a dam about gravity but you unlike the others try to make me feel bad

go back to your guns and build a target that says raaid...

not being constructive but mean in the future probably ill ignore you

quote:

Originally posted by raaaid:
anyway you are not constructive so i end my talk here, you like the rest dont give a dam about gravity but you unlike the others try to make me feel bad

You ignore most of what I say and I'm the one that's not constructive? If you would answer the question when I ask them instead of ignoring or lying about what I say then I wouldn't feel the urge to be so sarcastic.

quote:

Originally posted by raaaid:
go back to your guns and build a target that says raaid...

Only a truly warped person would do, or think of doing, something like that.

quote:

Originally posted by raaaid:
not being constructive but mean in the future probably ill ignore you

As I said, you ignore most of my questions already, what will be the difference?

I offer constructive questions to make you think but you just ignore them and keep saying the same thing over and over. You are the one that's not being constructive.

--Outlaw.

your main argument to say my concept of gravity doesnt work was that both halves didnt last the same

you finally admitted i could be right on both halves lasting the same but then instead of trying to go farther you started attacking me

most of your question seems from a child arguing, so i cant prove a looping yoyo makes an ellipse so what

i proved inwards spiral pulls more than outwards spiral, i proved both halves last the sam, i proved an ellipse is half inwards spiral half outwards, therefore i have an explanation for gravity

if you want to be constructive discuss this not my person

as said id loved to be proved wrong but you aint even close to prove me wrong, you think this is a dialect battle, i intend to understand things

why arent you clear do both half last the same or not(from peri to aphe)?