ubi.com    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  1C:Maddox Games  Hop To Forums  IL2 Maddox General Discussion    Why did so few planes have divebrakes?
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Picture of Daiichidoku
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Frankthetank36:
Well look at the P-80, it has airbrakes on the nose, nowhere near the wings


http://www.hq.nasa.gov/pao/History/SP-468/ch11-2.htm



 
Posts: 3100 | Registered: Thu September 09 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
I stand corrected, but they still are not actually on the wings. And I still don't see why they didn't just add flaps on the fuselage sides.
 
Posts: 99 | Registered: Sun August 16 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of AndyJWest
Posted Hide Post
Fuselage-mounted dive brakes will disrupt the airflow behind when opened - putting them in the belly looks a sensible choice. There are also structural and weight factors to take into consideration.
 
Posts: 1494 | Registered: Sat July 11 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Another reason for adding airbrakes: if you have them and the bandit on your tail doesn't, you can force an overshoot much more quickly than by slipping and using zero power with cowl flaps.


That only works in F14's when being chased by F5's and A4's.

"I'm gonna hit the brakes Goose, he'll fly right by." Smile
 
Posts: 469 | Registered: Tue October 05 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TS_Sancho:
quote:
Another reason for adding airbrakes: if you have them and the bandit on your tail doesn't, you can force an overshoot much more quickly than by slipping and using zero power with cowl flaps.


That only works in F14's when being chased by F5's and A4's.

"I'm gonna hit the brakes Goose, he'll fly right by." Smile


Yes, and only if you firewall the throttles and pull back on the stick Too Happy


Good hunting,
Sillius_Sodus
 
Posts: 918 | Registered: Fri September 16 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by NZ_Tui:
Hmmm I believe the very early P-51's had dive brakes but where not wired up to work....is this true?
The dive bomber version of the Mustang, the A-36 Apache, had dive brakes, but many of them did eventually have them wired closed because divebombing was simply not that effective at that point in the war. It was usually better to convert the energy gathered in a dive into speed so as to get the heck away from all that ground fire...

The main point of dive brakes in a dive bomber is to provide the pilot with more time and control to aim accurately. The purpose of dive brakes in a fighter is to slow down before important pieces of your airplane start coming off at an inconvenient time.

As a side note, the contract for the A-36 was placed primarily to keep the Mustang line in production until the Congress authorized more funding for new fighters in early 1942; apparently, there was still some money left in the Army's purse designated for ground attack so they could use that. The A-36 turned out to be quite effective in its intended role, but by the time they figured that out, the production line had moved on to churn out P-51As and then in late 1942, several people on both sides of the Atlantic got the bright idea of putting a Merlin in it...

cheers

horseback


"Here's your new Mustangs, boys. You can learn to fly'em on the way to the target. Cheers!" -LTCOL Don Blakeslee, 4th FG CO, February 27th, 1944
 
Posts: 4295 | Registered: Sun June 09 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Kettenhunde
Posted Hide Post
quote:
many of them did eventually have them wired closed


Hi Horseback,

quote:
A sort of urban legend has sprung up about the A-36A's dive brakes. According to some stories, the dive brakes of the A-36A were next to useless and were deliberately wired shut at the manufacturers so that they could not be used. This story is totally incorrect. On the contrary, the dive brakes proved to be quite effective in combat, and the aircraft was so stable with the dive brakes extended that bombing while in a dive was particularly accurate. The origin of this legend seems to have been in the United States, at a time before the A-36s first went overseas. It seems that A-36A pilots were told by their officers in the USA that their dive brakes would be all but useless in combat and it would be best if they simply wired them shut. This turned out to be incorrect, and the dive brakes were used to great effect throughout the Sicilian campaign and the Italian invasion.



http://home.att.net/~jbaugher1/p51_6.html

Wiring them shut does not make any sense at all. It does not fit into the aerodynamics or the tightly controlled way in which all airplanes are maintained.

It smacks of the same uninformed speculation that gave rise to the "wiring the Bf-109's slats shut" myths.

All the best,

Crumpp



Our Museum glorifies no state, but strives to use these aircraft as a memorial for all lost in war. Our freedom can only be truly appreciated when held in contrast to those who sought to destroy it. Our staff is proudly made up of people from many cultures and religions. Click the photos for details of our projects.
"Those who do not remember history are destined to repeat it." - Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 2990 | Registered: Fri March 25 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 2  
 

ubi.com    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  1C:Maddox Games  Hop To Forums  IL2 Maddox General Discussion    Why did so few planes have divebrakes?

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy