![]() |
|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
![]() |
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/pao/History/SP-468/ch11-2.htm |
|||
|
I stand corrected, but they still are not actually on the wings. And I still don't see why they didn't just add flaps on the fuselage sides.
|
||||
|
![]() |
Fuselage-mounted dive brakes will disrupt the airflow behind when opened - putting them in the belly looks a sensible choice. There are also structural and weight factors to take into consideration.
|
|||
|
That only works in F14's when being chased by F5's and A4's. "I'm gonna hit the brakes Goose, he'll fly right by." |
||||
|
Yes, and only if you firewall the throttles and pull back on the stick Good hunting, Sillius_Sodus |
||||
|
The dive bomber version of the Mustang, the A-36 Apache, had dive brakes, but many of them did eventually have them wired closed because divebombing was simply not that effective at that point in the war. It was usually better to convert the energy gathered in a dive into speed so as to get the heck away from all that ground fire... The main point of dive brakes in a dive bomber is to provide the pilot with more time and control to aim accurately. The purpose of dive brakes in a fighter is to slow down before important pieces of your airplane start coming off at an inconvenient time. As a side note, the contract for the A-36 was placed primarily to keep the Mustang line in production until the Congress authorized more funding for new fighters in early 1942; apparently, there was still some money left in the Army's purse designated for ground attack so they could use that. The A-36 turned out to be quite effective in its intended role, but by the time they figured that out, the production line had moved on to churn out P-51As and then in late 1942, several people on both sides of the Atlantic got the bright idea of putting a Merlin in it... cheers horseback "Here's your new Mustangs, boys. You can learn to fly'em on the way to the target. Cheers!" -LTCOL Don Blakeslee, 4th FG CO, February 27th, 1944 |
||||
|
![]() |
Hi Horseback,
http://home.att.net/~jbaugher1/p51_6.html Wiring them shut does not make any sense at all. It does not fit into the aerodynamics or the tightly controlled way in which all airplanes are maintained. It smacks of the same uninformed speculation that gave rise to the "wiring the Bf-109's slats shut" myths. All the best, Crumpp Our Museum glorifies no state, but strives to use these aircraft as a memorial for all lost in war. Our freedom can only be truly appreciated when held in contrast to those who sought to destroy it. Our staff is proudly made up of people from many cultures and religions. Click the photos for details of our projects. "Those who do not remember history are destined to repeat it." - Winston Churchill |
|||
|
| Powered by Eve Community | Page 1 2 |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|

