ubi.com    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  1C:Maddox Games  Hop To Forums  IL2 Maddox General Discussion    Saitek X65 - New HOTAS?
Page 1 2 3 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Posted Hide Post
This looks really good - the winner for me over the Logitech is the trim being on the throttle not the stick!

I use all CH stuff at the moment Fighterstick,pedals and pro throttle - Any one know if this could work with the CH pedals or would I need to get Saitek as well?

Could be seeling all my CH stuff soon lol
 
Posts: 250 | Registered: Thu December 07 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
looks interesting. I'm sad I just invested in a CH set up, but at the same I'm happy as CH is working just great. Sweet and sour, Smile

I don't like that twist. Every joystick I've had the twist eventually carries over to non twist functions, such as ailerons or elevator. So anytime you get those two movements you get a good dose of rudder. Logitech is notorious for this. And its worse b/c I fly 100% sensitivity on the joystick and in IL-2.

However the coolest moves can be pulled off by rolling and the 3D force extreme puts in full rudder. Great for airshow, mimicking AI fighters, and getting out of spins training but bad for combat as experten fill my booty with lead and LOL, silly noob, tricks are for AI's.


But with Logitech n Saitek both cranking something out, wonder what CH will come up with?


__________________________

I look to the sky where my help come from.
And I seen it circling around from the mountain
Thunder!
You feel it in your chest
You keep my mind at ease and my soul at rest
 
Posts: 150 | Registered: Tue August 18 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of ibeagle
Posted Hide Post
Twist stick rudder.
 
Posts: 48 | Registered: Sat April 29 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
IL2 Moderator
Picture of Urufu_Shinjiro
Posted Hide Post
X52 was a twist stick as well, but I never used it, it has a lock to lock it in place and I use my rudder pedals. Anyone willing to throw down this much cash will or at least should have rudder pedals, so I can hardly fault the company for using a twist rudder. If they didn't have a twist rudder then they would be blasted for that too, "what, you mean on top of all this money I have to buy pedals too?"...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flying online as NORAD_Shinjiro


 
Posts: 7561 | Registered: Thu November 18 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
IL2
Moderator
Picture of Bearcat99
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ibeagle:
Twist stick rudder.


Yeah but if you have pedals you can band that twist axis and turn it into a switch for rudder trim.
 
Posts: 15261 | Registered: Mon October 28 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Sokol__1
Posted Hide Post
On Saitek product page:

http://www.saitekusa.com/prod/x65f.htm

Not Force Feedback, Force Sense like F-16... 2kg-10kg load.

Sokol1
 
Posts: 330 | Registered: Sat August 27 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of DD_crash
Posted Hide Post
I think that they have missed the boat with force sensing Frown One guy on SimHQ thinks it isnt suitable for us or even FSX.
 
Posts: 354 | Registered: Wed July 18 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of TheFamilyMan
Posted Hide Post
Has everyone read the above link? Here's the nasty meat of it:

quote:
X65F Pro Flight System

Rule the skies with the latest Saitek X series controller – the Pro Flight X65F Control System. Custom engineered from high grade metal castings, this is a system that is built to withstand many combat engagements. The number of controls available will cater for any pilot’s needs, but the true innovation resides within the stick itself – Force Sensing technology.

What is Force Sensing?

In a world first for a manufactured simulation controller, the X65F’s stick does not move; instead, like those found in real modern fighter jets, it responds to pressure that you exert on the handle, resulting in a fast, accurate and realistic response that will make you the ace in your squadron. With no moving parts and a shaft that is made from high grade steel, this provides incredible reliability and longevity.
WHOA, this _is_ bunk!!! A joystick THAT DOES NOT MOVE! Sorry Saitek, I guess my X52 Pro will be fine for now...and all that joy lost on a FFB HOTAS...
 
Posts: 447 | Registered: Tue January 22 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of DD_crash
Posted Hide Post
There is always the Logi G940 Eek
 
Posts: 354 | Registered: Wed July 18 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
What is Force Sensing?

In a world first for a manufactured simulation controller, the X65F’s stick does not move; instead, like those found in real modern fighter jets, it responds to pressure that you exert on the handle


I thought I read somewhere that the Air Force gave up on the idea of a stick that didn't move because the pilots didn't like it.
 
Posts: 6 | Registered: Fri January 26 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Moderator: Maddox and General forums
Picture of Tully__
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Hawkbug:
quote:
What is Force Sensing?

In a world first for a manufactured simulation controller, the X65F’s stick does not move; instead, like those found in real modern fighter jets, it responds to pressure that you exert on the handle


I thought I read somewhere that the Air Force gave up on the idea of a stick that didn't move because the pilots didn't like it.


As far as I'm aware, these days they still use force sensing but the stick does give a bit when you push on it. Not a lot, only a bit - maybe +/- 5-10 degrees.
 
Posts: 12123 | Registered: Wed November 26 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Tully__:
quote:
Originally posted by Hawkbug:
I thought I read somewhere that the Air Force gave up on the idea of a stick that didn't move because the pilots didn't like it.


As far as I'm aware, these days they still use force sensing but the stick does give a bit when you push on it. Not a lot, only a bit - maybe +/- 5-10 degrees.


And that sounds so much better than admitting that the base of those shiny expensive high tech toys wears out over time!

(j/k, really could not resist Googly)
 
Posts: 176 | Registered: Tue June 24 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
I want to see a new stick and pedals from CH....
Why are they taking so long to answer the saitek X65 and logitech G940 competition.
 
Posts: 66 | Registered: Fri June 22 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Blottogg
Posted Hide Post
I don't know how Saitek has arranged their stick, but Tully is right, at least as far as the F-16 goes. The original (Block 1? Block 5?) control sticks were bolted to the cockpit, and didn't move. From what I remember, guys were straining their forearms trying not to overcontrol the aircraft, so General Dynamics built a little bit of movement into the later versions. Basically, they installed rubber washers, so the stick would move a little. Full input was about 25 lb. of force (you'll probably want to screw the X65 to the desk if it's in the same range), and that moved the top of the stick maybe an inch in any direction.

I'm not real keen on the twist rudder either, and would hope you could lock out the twist axis and use pedals, like previous Saitek rigs. As far as the force sensors go, it should be a non-issue to adapt. I remember being really worried about getting used to it after graduating from T-38's. With a few sim flights under my belt, my first flight in the jet was no problem (at least as far as the flight controls were concerned). The F-16 version of force sensing doesn't have any force feedback either, but I never missed it when flying. Force input was very intuitive, again as long as there was at least a little actual movement of the stick. Of course, the F-16 didn't buffet either.


Blotto

"A poor plan, violently executed, is better than no plan at all." - "Sledge"
 
Posts: 658 | Registered: Wed June 12 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
IL2 Moderator
Picture of Urufu_Shinjiro
Posted Hide Post
Well, I do like the all metal construction, and it has a TON of hat switches. But two rotaries is too little. Maybe I'll get it if it comes out in reviews that the force sensing is super accurate and improves play etc., but for now it looks like the G940 is going under my xmas tree.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flying online as NORAD_Shinjiro


 
Posts: 7561 | Registered: Thu November 18 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 2 3  
 

ubi.com    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  1C:Maddox Games  Hop To Forums  IL2 Maddox General Discussion    Saitek X65 - New HOTAS?

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy