ubi.com    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  1C:Maddox Games  Hop To Forums  IL2 Maddox General Discussion    Flying the SM.79
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Picture of AndyJWest
Posted
Though the debate about the SM.79 damage model is interesting, and will no doubt continue, it seems to me that we need another thread on actually flying this beauty/beast (delete as appropriate). I haven't done a great deal with it as I'm a hopeless level bomber, though the torpedo option looks promising. It is an unusual aircraft though, so I'd be interested to see what others to say about getting the best out of it.

In particular, what do people think of the automatic flaps? I was flying one online the other day (on a server on my own - I was just checking 4.09m online, and spotted the SM.79 as an option). The auto-flaps seem to make climbing awkward, as I'd got trimmed for level flight, changed prop pitch for cruise, and then decided I needed to climb a little higher to avoid terrain. I fed in a little up elevator trim, but soon found I was decelerating as the flaps started to deploy - throwing the plane well off trim in the process. Though I managed to get back into stable flight without too much difficulty, I can imagine that this can catch you out if you do not pay attention. It is also possible to run into problems on landing approach, with the flaps starting to raise if you push the nose down - this is much more dangerous, though if you increase power and pull the nose up (gently!), you can get the flaps back down - at this point it might be safer to go around and try again.

Are there any other points about this aircraft that need special consideration? I will do a bit more experimentation in the next few days and see what else becomes apparent.

(Can I ask people NOT to get into discussions about the DM in this thread, but stay with the existing one for this)
 
Posts: 1601 | Registered: Sat July 11 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
I've found that I really love the auto flaps. I seem to have far smoother landings and approaches in the Sm79 compared to other large aircraft. On the other hand, I also don't climb at the 'best climb' speed, since I find I have way too little control. I generally climb at ~250kmh IAS. Or, once I'm high enough (~3000), I generally climb at an even faster IAS, sticking on coarse pitch for that.
 
Posts: 792 | Registered: Thu May 22 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of The_Stealth_Owl
Posted Hide Post
Someone said something about 3 speeds backwards and 1 forward?


Whats that all about? Confused



Being British is about driving in a German car to an Irish pub for a Belgian beer, then grabbing an Indian curry or a Turkish kebab on the way home, to sit on Swedish furniture and watch American shows on a Japanese TV.
 
Posts: 891 | Registered: Thu August 13 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of TinyTim
Posted Hide Post
Just climb at faster speed than 200kph IAS, which is roughly the speed at which flaps deploy. Also, don't forget to "shift into a lower gear" (i.e. raise prop pitch above 50%) during climbing, or your speed will fall.


No one in sane mind ever turns when he has any other option.
~ DKoor
 
Posts: 1262 | Registered: Thu December 06 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of AndyJWest
Posted Hide Post
PanzerAce, I've found the same thing - accelerating to well above 'flaps up' speed (220Km/h it think it was) and then climbing is safer.

I've just tried to torpedo a carrier. Even with ROF set at 10 (i.e 1/10th realistic rate of fire), I still got peppered with holes, and also missed by a mile - I need to figure out aiming properly. The SM.79 is certainly tough, I had holes in the wings, number 3 engine smoking (later cut out), and number 2 engine on reduced power - couldn't climb much, but made it back to base ok. Forgot to save the track, but I'll have another try.

quote:

Someone said something about 3 speeds backwards and 1 forward?

It was bad joke about Italians. They had a reputation for not being keen on fighting during WW2. There tanks were supposed to have 3 reverse gears, and one forward gear just in case we attacked from behind. Nuh uh

Actually, it is quite unfair, the Italians were capable fighters when they had decent equipment, and were motivated to fight. They were often poorly equipped though, and many had little commitment to the war anyway.

What do you think of flying the SM.79, Owl?

EDIT

TinyTim: right about the prop pitch - it's easy to forget this.
 
Posts: 1601 | Registered: Sat July 11 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of The_Stealth_Owl
Posted Hide Post
I'v only flown it once. I will fly it some more later, then I will tell you what I think. Smile

Right now I am greatly obsessed with the B-534, followed by the CR-42.



Being British is about driving in a German car to an Irish pub for a Belgian beer, then grabbing an Indian curry or a Turkish kebab on the way home, to sit on Swedish furniture and watch American shows on a Japanese TV.
 
Posts: 891 | Registered: Thu August 13 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of AndyJWest
Posted Hide Post
I've noticed one thing with the SM.79:



Take a good look around the interior - you can see most of it from the bomb aimer's position. There are some nice details. However, the bomb aimer's pencil does not roll around on the map - this is clearly a bug. Should I report this to TD? Wink2
 
Posts: 1601 | Registered: Sat July 11 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
I would, thats a major flaw in the PM (pencil modeling) of the SM79. But I'm afraid they might pork its physics if too many people complain Too Happy
 
Posts: 240 | Registered: Tue August 25 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Nah, I beat Raaaid can absolutely explain us why this happens. Wink2






 
Posts: 1181 | Registered: Fri August 10 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of The_Stealth_Owl
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Wildnoob:
Nah, I beat Raaaid can absolutely explain us why this happens. Wink2



Becuase the pencil is magnetic!



Being British is about driving in a German car to an Irish pub for a Belgian beer, then grabbing an Indian curry or a Turkish kebab on the way home, to sit on Swedish furniture and watch American shows on a Japanese TV.
 
Posts: 891 | Registered: Thu August 13 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Does the pencil really exist, or is it just part of our personal imaginations. We expect it to be there so it is. But we accept the fact that it isn't rolling in game, so it wont. Its all relative to the beholder... Blink Wink2
 
Posts: 240 | Registered: Tue August 25 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Choctaw111
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by AndyJWest:
I've noticed one thing with the SM.79:



Take a good look around the interior - you can see most of it from the bomb aimer's position. There are some nice details. However, the bomb aimer's pencil does not roll around on the map - this is clearly a bug. Should I report this to TD? Wink2


We had a LOT of fun in the other pencil thread Veryhappy


-PC Performance Aficionado and
proud forum member since 2001
 
Posts: 4281 | Registered: Wed January 07 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of The_Stealth_Owl
Posted Hide Post
The pencil in the TB3 works.


Anyways. It can take a massive amount of damadge.


And is fun-to-fly.



Being British is about driving in a German car to an Irish pub for a Belgian beer, then grabbing an Indian curry or a Turkish kebab on the way home, to sit on Swedish furniture and watch American shows on a Japanese TV.
 
Posts: 891 | Registered: Thu August 13 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of JG52Uther
Posted Hide Post
Its a beautiful plane!Its good that you have to think a bit when flying it.
 
Posts: 4974 | Registered: Sun April 11 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Insuber
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JG52Uther:
Its a beautiful plane!Its good that you have to think a bit when flying it.


I had much fun with her online yesterday, against Hurricanes and Avias ... a blast ! Fast, sturdy and well armed.

As other people pointed out, the crews loved the SM.79, and the many books written about her use as torpedo bomber are full with praises. I remember only critics for the lack of crew protection and the tendency to burn, as you would expect from a wooden plane.

Regards,
Insuber
 
Posts: 271 | Registered: Sat December 20 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of DKoor
Posted Hide Post
Wood in IL-2 comes from a different tree.
 
Posts: 5080 | Registered: Fri October 27 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Enforcer572005
Posted Hide Post
I rather like it, as I tend to do best in anti-shipping attacks online, but for some reason I can't get the pitch change to show up onscreen, and I really don't know if they are happening.

I used both my add/decrease and a 40% and 60% key command that I added, but I still can't tell. Is the pitch rate supposed to show onscreen like the other AC, or am I missing something.....again?

I like the auto flaps from what I've experienced so far.



------------------------------

Sleep tight tonight, your Air
Force is......awake!
 
Posts: 2410 | Registered: Wed February 02 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of thefruitbat
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DKoor:
Wood in IL-2 comes from a different tree.


Too Happy



U___1)Nazi Germany built all the best things and won teh war.
B___2)The USA built all the best things and won teh war.
I___3)Everyone else was cannon fodderWink
 
Posts: 1102 | Registered: Sat February 07 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DKoor:
Wood in IL-2 comes from a different tree.


If I recall, that would be the rare Lorica Lignea tree that Oleg created the infamous DeltaWood® from? Winky
 
Posts: 957 | Registered: Sat August 28 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Enforcer572005:
I rather like it, as I tend to do best in anti-shipping attacks online, but for some reason I can't get the pitch change to show up onscreen, and I really don't know if they are happening.

I used both my add/decrease and a 40% and 60% key command that I added, but I still can't tell. Is the pitch rate supposed to show onscreen like the other AC, or am I missing something.....again?


If the plane is not modeled to have manual prop pitch or rpm then it won't show. If you have not set for manual when the plane
does have automatic or manual then it will not show. Lastly if you have CEM off it will not. Those are the ways I know to not
have it work by keys/buttons/rotary/slider.
 
Posts: 6730 | Registered: Tue March 06 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 2  
 

ubi.com    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  1C:Maddox Games  Hop To Forums  IL2 Maddox General Discussion    Flying the SM.79

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy