![]() |
|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
Despite all of the complaints about favoritism toward Russian aircraft in Il-2, it is very clear to me that they are inferior to the American and German aircraft in their tendency to break apart at high speed, even without sustaining g's. I've experienced this effect in both the Yak and La series.
Has anyone tested the maximum safe dive speeds for the various Russian aircraft in Il-2? I know there are hundreds of links to different Il-2 sites, but would appreciate some help in finding one with this specific information. Thank you. |
|||
|
get il2compare.
the max divespeed for most soviet fighters is indeed low........... ..................................... and before you have to ask: Shift + F1 will center the sight. Ctrl + D will remove the lenscap F4F and I-16 has manual landing gear only |
||||
|
![]() |
Or HardBall's Aircraft Viewer for 4.08.
http://mission4today.com/index...&file=details&id=325 ______________________________ I.D. Anybody interested in flying an air combat SIMULATION? If you're looking for Operational Realism, the JSAWG wants you. "Hey, I'm all about noble death. Pointless noble death on the other hand..." LTC Cam Mitchell, Stargate SG-1 |
|||
|
Thanks!
|
||||
|
![]() |
In my experience this moaning comes nearly exclusively from people who never fly Russian fighters, always only against them, and thus become blind for their own major advantages - like better high-alt performance and dive speed. That's why their opinion isn't worth a nickle. Back on topic - an all metal Yak-3 VK-107 is an excellent diver, more than 900kph enables it to outdive a mustang. Late Yaks are fairly good divers too (about 800kph), yet still not a match for contemporary german fighters. La-s and early yaks with their 700kph are even worse. Yak-9U's considerably better VNE is one of major reasons I prefer it over the La-7. No one in sane mind ever turns when he has any other option. ~ DKoor |
|||
|
|
|
Once I was in a LaGG-3, saw some enemy fighters and entered into a shallow dive, and my wing popped off at about 580 kph.
----------------- Farewell to freedom in the Adriatic and to the days of wild abandon. Check out my BRAND NEW campaign, "The Pirate Menace" Also check out my old Air Pirates campaigns! Air Pirates Part One Air Pirates Part Two |
|||
|
I remember some weeks ago I was diving to escape a P-38 (I know) , around 540 km and my wings ripped off, and thought the F4 had weak dive capability but as I bailed out I saw the P-47 climbing back up, while the 38 was still nosing towards the ground.
Naughty jug. I swore I could hear the P-38 pilots screaming kill steal lol.
Yes. Alot of this has to do with online, most engagements are TnB and at 3000m or lower, which really favors most of the VVS line up and the strengths of their planes. Also the VVS armaments rate of fire is alot higher (but you exhaust ammo quicker). Strafe funs in IL-2 on lined up targets generally have more hits than strafe runs in say a BF-109. I have seen other posts mentioned there are historical reasoning for the difference in armament. I wouldn't know, I haven't done extensive research in that area. I have some some really good pilots do things like regularly shoot down yak 3 or la 7's while flying a 109E or spit mk V. So alot of it depents on situation and skill factors and flying best for your plane and downplaying your opponent plane's best strenghts. __________________________ I look to the sky where my help come from. And I seen it circling around from the mountain Thunder! You feel it in your chest You keep my mind at ease and my soul at rest |
||||
|
![]() |
all pretty moot until (hopefully) Team Daidalos addresses compressability/critical mach for all types in FB for patch 5.0
everyone but P-38 and B1 rocket drivers have had a free pass in this regard and are spoiled beyond belief |
|||
|
| Powered by Eve Community |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|

