ubi.com    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  1C:Maddox Games  Hop To Forums  IL2 Maddox General Discussion    The Focke Wulf fw-187
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Picture of stalkervision
Posted
Never knew this existed. What is the luftwaffe had these in the Battle of Britain equiped with db engines instead of the me-110?


http://www.militaryfactory.com....asp?aircraft_id=573

 
Posts: 6402 | Registered: Tue December 19 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of roybaty
Posted Hide Post
Isn't this in the game?


-------------- HARDWARE --------------

Mobo: XFX N780-ISH9 - CPU: 2.9ghz Core2Duo 7500 - VIDEO CARD: nVidia 9800GT/512 - RAM: 4 GB DDR2 6400 - HOTAS: Thrustmaster COUGAR - PEDALS: CH Pro Pedals USB - OTHER INPUT: Track IR4 - OS: Vista Home Premium
 
Posts: 1959 | Registered: Fri November 23 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Gammelpreusse
Posted Hide Post
It's not.

It's a bit of the german Whirlwind. A highly capable plane that got pushed back due to politics in favor of Messerschmitt. Opinions from pilots using it in Scandinavia were full of praise.
 
Posts: 444 | Registered: Wed June 03 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Bremspropeller
Posted Hide Post
Teh pwn.


 
Posts: 4319 | Registered: Fri August 30 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of DIRTY-MAC
Posted Hide Post
Some were operational in Norway if i remembered correctly.


 
Posts: 1480 | Registered: Fri March 19 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
IL2 Moderator
Picture of Heliopause
Posted Hide Post
It appears to have been a unit in Denmark at the airfield of Vearlöse(Kopenhagen). Only a small number though.
Before that they where used to give some protection for the Focke Wulf factories near/at Bremen.



"The pilot managed to crashland it successfully and we refrained from shooting up the survivors. The word must have got around, as the next day I was shot down and had to bale out. While I was lying in the sand with a busted shoulder, the Bf 109 pilot who did me made a run over me but held his fire."
Flg Off R.F. Martin, No 73 Sqn
 
Posts: 1225 | Registered: Sun May 29 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Daiichidoku
Posted Hide Post
Willy Knifesmith & Co. really loused things up for better designs

Fw 187-Bf 110
He 100-Bf 109
He 280-Me 262


 
Posts: 3117 | Registered: Thu September 09 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Heliopause:
It appears to have been a unit in Denmark at the airfield of Vearlöse(Kopenhagen). Only a small number though.
Before that they where used to give some protection for the Focke Wulf factories near/at Bremen.


They went to Norway first and when excellent reports were filed they were recalled to Denmark.
 
Posts: 105 | Registered: Fri June 05 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of RSS-Martin
Posted Hide Post
Well being buddy buddy with the party bigwigs got Willy all the contracts he needed, to the disadvantage of his competitors.


 
Posts: 227 | Registered: Sat May 06 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of stalkervision
Posted Hide Post
Bad choice. Blink
 
Posts: 6402 | Registered: Tue December 19 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Those 3 Messerschmidts had one, very important, reason to be prefered: they were better suited for mass-production, easier to build and because of that cheaper.
Better to have 5 BF109 than 3 He100 i.e.

And, why shouldn't one take the second best plane when one already has the best pilots??


 
Posts: 118 | Registered: Mon April 07 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of AndyJWest
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by robtek1957:
Those 3 Messerschmidts had one, very important, reason to be prefered: they were better suited for mass-production, easier to build and because of that cheaper.
Better to have 5 BF109 than 3 He100 i.e.

And, why shouldn't one take the second best plane when one already has the best pilots??


Now there's a non-sequitur if ever I saw one.
 
Posts: 1575 | Registered: Sat July 11 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Because of what????
Arguments, not slogans :-D


 
Posts: 118 | Registered: Mon April 07 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Some of this is woulda-coulda-shoulda stuff; IF this or that aircraft had entered production, it MIGHT have been more successful.

It might also have been less effective than the 110 overall. How was it in the bomber destroyer role? Nightfighting? Ground attack? The 110 gets a lot of bad press because it turned out not to have been a very effective long range escort, but it did turn out to be very useful in many roles. Would the Falke have been as adaptable?

We'll never know, but someone is going to sell a lot of books and/or magazine articles by speculating about it.

cheers

horseback


"Here's your new Mustangs, boys. You can learn to fly'em on the way to the target. Cheers!" -LTCOL Don Blakeslee, 4th FG CO, February 27th, 1944
 
Posts: 4305 | Registered: Sun June 09 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of jarink
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by robtek1957:
Those 3 Messerschmidts had one, very important, reason to be prefered: they were better suited for mass-production, easier to build and because of that cheaper.
Better to have 5 BF109 than 3 He100 i.e.


The problem with that argument is that the Nazi leaders were infamous (especially later in the war) for approving all manner of military projects that, while very advanced, were very difficult and/or costly to manufacture (Tiger tanks, anyone? There were only about 1,300 of them produced during the entire war.)



 
Posts: 2706 | Registered: Fri February 11 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Bremspropeller
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Those 3 Messerschmitts had one, very important, reason to be prefered: they were better suited for mass-production, easier to build and because of that cheaper.


Any problem can be sorted out, given enough time and manpower - the Me 210 is a good example for that.

Remember the troubeled test- and introduction-phase of the Fw 190?
They wanted to saw-off the 190, and had it not been for Lt. Borris and his flight-test team, the Fw 190 would very propably have made another nice "what if"-story.
"Fortune" had it that the pilots and technicians involved in this project insisted on carrying on and fixing the problems, rather than saving Willy's fighter-monopole.

It ain't a sectret that Milch and Heinkel weren't exactly best friends and that Willy and Milch got along rather nicely.

Given enough time to finish it's detail-design, the Fw 187 would have made a better fighter than the 110 and it most propably would have served just as well in all the other roles the 110 was used for.

Remember that the 110's early use as ground-attack fighter was partially caused by it's less than stellar air-to-air record (in the west).


 
Posts: 4319 | Registered: Fri August 30 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 105 | Registered: Fri June 05 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by horseback:
Some of this is woulda-coulda-shoulda stuff; IF this or that aircraft had entered production, it MIGHT have been more successful.

It might also have been less effective than the 110 overall. How was it in the bomber destroyer role? Nightfighting? Ground attack? The 110 gets a lot of bad press because it turned out not to have been a very effective long range escort, but it did turn out to be very useful in many roles. Would the Falke have been as adaptable?

We'll never know, but someone is going to sell a lot of books and/or magazine articles by speculating about it.

cheers

horseback


I fully agree.
Using, as it's usually done, unarmed prototypes' performance data and "enthusiastic tales" by pilots (sometimes even factory test pilots) is a good way to write and sell books, not to rewrite history.

Moreover, that reminds me some other Kurt Tank's mythological and not very likely story such as his "escape from Mustangs" flying Ta-152 ...
 
Posts: 53 | Registered: Sun November 04 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Bremspropeller
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Using, as it's usually done, unarmed prototypes' performance data and "enthusiastic tales" by pilots (sometimes even factory test pilots) is a good way to write and sell books, not to rewrite history.


I wonder who's trying to re-wirite history.


 
Posts: 4319 | Registered: Fri August 30 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Rewrite history?

Just think what the Miles-Baker fighters might have done had the MoD not blackballed them at the behest of Supermarine and Hawker...

Or what the prognosticators might have written if say, the XP-39 program were discontinued before the Army Air Corps decided to strip it of its turbosupercharger and add some armor and other changes--why, that little Bell fighter design could have shortened the war if only the bureaucrats in the Army had been as farsighted as we are ...

...yadyadayada.

See? works for Allied aircraft too.

cheers

horseback


"Here's your new Mustangs, boys. You can learn to fly'em on the way to the target. Cheers!" -LTCOL Don Blakeslee, 4th FG CO, February 27th, 1944
 
Posts: 4305 | Registered: Sun June 09 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community  
 

ubi.com    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  1C:Maddox Games  Hop To Forums  IL2 Maddox General Discussion    The Focke Wulf fw-187

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy