Yeah man i just noticed how powerful jsf has just gotten. I think its time for a JSF counter offensive right now on the PS3 add your psn names her and lets get ready to fight and destroy them FOR MOTHER RUSSIA

quote:

Originally posted by bigmoney91:
Yeah man i just noticed how powerful jsf has just gotten. I think its time for a JSF counter offensive right now on the PS3 add your psn names her and lets get ready to fight and destroy them FOR MOTHER RUSSIA

I also have no idea how they came back. As of today, i think they have 18 territories against 20 for us. i don't play a lot, but i do my share (more wins than losses, lol). If they managed to push us back, we can do it back to them. Like the general says: "Let's fight like spetznaz, like true Russians!"

When the JSFs attack, the empire strikes back.

FOR THE MOTHERLAND!

PSN: FenrisWolf228
I'm not going to play much around this weekend (I'm on a bit of a road trip in a U-Haul... oh joy!) but when I'm back i'll accept all the friend requests y'all send. Most of my experience is in 1v1 games, but I've played a lot of 2v2 as well. Anyway, send me an invite and we'll play!

The problem is, you can't just keep going in with one set strategy - if you have a good strategy like Mrnazraq, then good. But - instead of being like (hey they're racing me to yankee, I'm going to keep going there - ) adapt and overcome.

If you see them going one way, formulate a new plan off your old plan. To keep going straight at them is fool hardy as they will take you out.

We have bigger and better vehicles, but they have airstrikes. Airstrikes that the euros JUST LOVE to upgrade to pulverize us to itty bitty commie bits.

Also.. it looks like we're winning in Grissom air base. By a lot. So, if you're wise, all you new guys should go after grissom while letting the more experienced commanders try and help us get out of the hole and take Shenendoah and Ft Campbell back. IF we can manage to do this, we might be able to turn this around.

If not.. and we lose Grissom airbase... then who cares? we're already losing two territories as is.. and they only need one for a victory. (and the americans aren't helping us at all)

I defended Ft Campbell raid yesterday, and won! My partner had told me that Foxtrot (the critical building near the DZ) had more HP than any of the other buildings, so they'll probably go to Bravo first (the one closest to them), then either head to Sierra (the one on the far East of the map) or Whiskey (northwest of the map).

I snuck my transports in from behind their line of tanks and took out their gunships, then brought my transports back to my engineers who were waiting at one of the uplinks. I transported them to Sierra and garrisoned a tower overlooking the entire complex.

Basically, we won the battle with garrisoned engineers in key places. I had 1 transport that kept sneaking around taking out their gunships once they wandered too far from their tanks. My partner had 1 gunship that he used to attack their tanks once they were in range of the garrisoned engineers.

The whole battle, I only deployed 4 units.

My kungfu master in China always told me, "Don't fight his one hand with your one hand. Use two hands, then you have an advantage." The same applies in EndWar. If there's a tank heading towards me, I don't just send 1 gunship after him, I also send other tanks in as well. Once he's already targetted one of my tanks for attack, I'll send in my transports to help in bringing it down quicker.

exacly azraq, I agree fully.

If you bring in a transport a tank and a chopper, wherever you go - if not two of each, or two trans a chopper and 3 tanks.. you will win as russia.

Russians... are slow. But powerful, all our new guys need to realize that, we're not meant to fight quickly (thats why we suck so bad at raids) we're meant to power the enemy out.

but don't just try to beat the enemy with a stick, you have to be stealthy about it.

ooo! and electronic warfare level 2 is a godsend.

Take heart, comrades!

Moscow shall never fall!

Hi Everyone, I just wanted to put your attention to a cowardly tactic (I would use a word that starts wity p and ends with ussy but don't wana get banned) the europeans have been doing. PLEASE DO NOT PLAY THE REGAN SEA BASE! thats all the europeans play.They don't ever play any map where the enemy has air support. Its really sad that they say they are good, because I've wiped the floor with every european I've met and killed their entire army permanently.

I sit in maps where europe has no support for half an hour and can't get a game started, yet I try to go to maps with support for them like the seabase and there are thousands of european just waiting to start a game.

Check the numbers, sea base has over 3000 games played, other maps barely have 1000. Please stop giving them easy wins and false pride and play maps where they don't have support, WE WILL WIPE THE FLOOR WITH THEM. Europe is NOTHING with out off map support. If they loose the seabase, it highly likely that they will loose the war.

SPZ

hahaha. you russians are funny. you say we only rely on air support and yet if you take the numbers for most of FirstWar we have had the least amount of air support. and we are RAPING both you and the americans so you are really in no position to say you are so good. you have already lost.

How come on the PS3 that there were like 3 or 4 Russian territories right next to Paris for about a week and yet we never had a chance to attack Paris? Why is that?

you need bedford level, england

quote:

Originally posted by tonydaglas934:
Hi Everyone, I just wanted to put your attention to a cowardly tactic (I would use a word that starts wity p and ends with ussy but don't wana get banned) the europeans have been doing. PLEASE DO NOT PLAY THE REGAN SEA BASE! thats all the europeans play.They don't ever play any map where the enemy has air support. Its really sad that they say they are good, because I've wiped the floor with every european I've met and killed their entire army permanently.

I sit in maps where europe has no support for half an hour and can't get a game started, yet I try to go to maps with support for them like the seabase and there are thousands of european just waiting to start a game.

Check the numbers, sea base has over 3000 games played, other maps barely have 1000. Please stop giving them easy wins and false pride and play maps where they don't have support, WE WILL WIPE THE FLOOR WITH THEM. Europe is NOTHING with out off map support. If they loose the seabase, it highly likely that they will loose the war.

SPZ

mate, Europe didn't have any air support for virtually the entire Eastern European campaign and they fought their way to Carpathia if any faction is reliant on air support it's the JSF.

UBISOFT - STOP SCREWING SGB AND THE ONLINE COMMUNITY ON XBOX360

It is not fair for SGB to be stuck with ONE battlefield, while there are no many fronts for them to open up.

Not only will this failure of the Ubisoft Community Manager discourage SGB players from playing (Many SGB player are not having trouble finding games!), it will ruin the online community in the future by having less players overall.

I play for the EFC. But I want SGB players out there too so I can find some fun games. But this is getting out of hand.

quote:

Originally posted by roguewarrior727:
UBISOFT - STOP SCREWING SGB AND THE ONLINE COMMUNITY ON XBOX360

It is not fair for SGB to be stuck with ONE battlefield, while there are no many fronts for them to open up.

Not only will this failure of the Ubisoft Community Manager discourage SGB players from playing (Many SGB player are not having trouble finding games!), it will ruin the online community in the future by having less players overall.

I play for the EFC. But I want SGB players out there too so I can find some fun games. But this is getting out of hand.

Why is SBZ allowed only one battle map? Why can't they start making a push to attack EFC's capital?

quote:

Originally posted by BerserkNurple:
hahaha. you russians are funny. you say we only rely on air support and yet if you take the numbers for most of FirstWar we have had the least amount of air support. and we are RAPING both you and the americans so you are really in no position to say you are so good. you have already lost.

Wow this is the SGB thread, if you must insult us for not being on the Uber L337 Side of the war then you are just an idiot.

You know, it seems like the devs just want to end the war and they are helping europe at every turn to allow them to win, I've been watching the numbers and it seems like the europeans are winning maps where they have less wins than SPZ, for example last night.

Ft. Campbell
Conquest
Attacker
SPZ
685
(216)Defender
EFEC
469

wuz up with that? There are many territories we could be attacking, yet we have only one battle field to play on, I swear this game has the dumbest online system ever, when we were close to paris, we didn't attack it, then we only have one map to play in, Do devs care at all about the satisfaction of the players? We paid money for your game to have fun, and you are doing everything to make us hate it with downed servers, glitches, no money, BS in one factions favor.

This could be an AWESOME game, but UBI needs to support it and LISTEN to what the palyers want.

quote:

Originally posted by tonydaglas934:
You know, it seems like the devs just want to end the war and they are helping europe at every turn to allow them to win, I've been watching the numbers and it seems like the europeans are winning maps where they have less wins than SPZ, for example last night.

Ft. Campbell
Conquest
Attacker
SPZ
685
(216)Defender
EFEC
469

wuz up with that? There are many territories we could be attacking, yet we have only one battle field to play on, I swear this game has the dumbest online system ever, when we were close to paris, we didn't attack it, then we only have one map to play in, Do devs care at all about the satisfaction of the players? We paid money for your game to have fun, and you are doing everything to make us hate it with downed servers, glitches, no money, BS in one factions favor.

This could be an AWESOME game, but UBI needs to support it and LISTEN to what the palyers want.

I ask again. Why is it only letting you fight one map when you have all these borders to EFC??

quote:

Originally posted by tonydaglas934:
...I've been watching the numbers and it seems like the europeans are winning maps where they have less wins than SPZ, for example last night.

Ft. Campbell
Conquest
Attacker
SPZ
685
(216)Defender
EFEC
469

wuz up with that?

Good question. I won't go so far as to say they are trying to end the war, but I do agree with you the question as to why we lost that map when the stat show we won.

quote:

Originally posted by stiv_x:

quote:

Originally posted by tonydaglas934:
...I've been watching the numbers and it seems like the europeans are winning maps where they have less wins than SPZ, for example last night.

Ft. Campbell
Conquest
Attacker
SPZ
685
(216)Defender
EFEC
469

wuz up with that?

Good question. I won't go so far as to say they are trying to end the war, but I do agree with you the question as to why we lost that map when the stat show we won.

I have seen an explanation that is believable for our loss of FT Campbell. It goes like this:

"The Russians won at Ft. Campbell but because they were unsuccessful in their attack on Springfield, they gave up the attacking territory of Grissom Air Base, thus forfeiting the army base due to it being cut off from the SPZ supply line. Having been pushed off the continent, the Spetsnaz are now making an attempt to re-take Grissom from out of Rondane."

You know, if the JSF could just hold off long enough for our SPZ forces to take one of the surround territories of Washington from the EFEC, they will survive just long enough for us to take it instead.