quote:

Originally posted by JTF_ClonE_:

quote:

Originally posted by dookkahda:
How the hell does Paris gets under attack? When clearly the EFEC defended their territories. Man that's gotta suck. And Good job JSF, continue the march on Moscow.

I was allso woundering the same thing all tho
EFEC was clearly dominateing on those two maps . If you take a look at Turn 37 you can see that Europeans were winning those battles.
All tho the Ramstein was raid and Rozenber was Conquest. So yes wht the hell!!!!

We los Rozenbur because we attacked it from Glen Albyn at teh same time as USS reagan

And by losing USS Reagan JSF we lost glen albyn and by this we lost Rozenburg

Ramstein was a Raid and was succesful now they do not have Air Support for paris attack.

bah the americans will probebly win tomorrow with 30 territories.
And the russians will not get Paris nither will they get Le Cito, beacose Europeans are duffer then you think

Correct me if I'm wrong, and God knows someone will.... but I was under the impression from the ingame objective menu that the JSF needed to control 30 territories and 3 capitals. I know in the 360 war Moscow never fell... so what's up? If the war ends wt just 30 territories and no decisive battle... that will be a HUGE letdown ... Huge... really..huge...

30 territories and 2 capitals was changed for 360

and I think we got that changed as well with the recent patch so yeah if the get Moscow we will start preparing for a new war

Anyone know how this happened?

If the EFEC won both of their maps yesterday then how is it that the AI General gave the territories to the SPZ to attack Paris? And now us JSF cannot get a match for the only 2 maps we have?

Turn 37 clearly gives the wins to EFEC. They got jipped big time

They were attacking rosenburg from glen albyn so when we took glen their attack was stopped.

Flanked them if you will.

Ramstein battle was a raid which did take the airbase offline.

Glen albyn....how the hell do the euros manage any lead on that map...straight line, little area for moving or flanking...can hardly sneak around...yet they they are leading us by 6% in assault.

glen albyn is my best map and im EF
even on assault its very rare for me to lose on it
being able to reach the middle uplinks and chokepoints at such a fast time gives me perfect opportunitys to plant minefields and get my units into cover.

only trouble i ever have is the JSF artillery

You wouldn't have time to set up minefields against me...may get there first but my armor will be rolling up shortly after.

I'm kinda ****ed about artillery at the moment because my best piece went AWOL last night.

i do rely on the enemy defending or taking his closest uplinks first but i hardly ever see JSF who decide to send in their main force before im able to set up my defences
alot seem to just artillery shell me for most the game so they decide to hold back most the time
in reagan it was an absolute nightmare fighting defensive JSF, no wonder most my casualties have been on thqt base

glen albyn artillery is alot easier for me as i can use alot of hit and run attacks, the high amount of trees conceal my movements really well

I rush under artillery shelling you



Anyways EMP is a perfect counter to hit and run your gunships are so famous for.

All I need is one engineer or riflemen at the beginning and I can stop any raids on my flank unitl I bring units there.

evil EMP
it is a very scary weapon
im thankful that its not used on me that much though, guessing not many people realise just how powerful it really is :P

i actually prefer being airstriked at it does less harm to me due to my vehicles relying on speed and shields, costs more CP too. it is annoying when the enemy actively airstrike my downed units though

my artillery are all hardened with MLRS rockets and my riflemen fully upgraded so im starting to destroy uplinks more directly. just a shame the EF have the worst artillery in the game.

to answer your question on why we are loosing there....it's because most of our forces (aka good players) are in the east pushing to moscow. For some reason everyone wants to get back at russia for the earleir invasion that took about 16 turns to turn around. Like Moraq said the EF is a minor annoyance as long as fortress reagan is still a map. I guarantee you if we would all redirect our attention to glen then the fight would be different, remebr back when we alwayswon glen...that was before the fight in spain finally broke out and we pushed into matera, after that no one gave a care about northern Europe. I played there twice today and won but have played the last sgb map 10 times and won, its jsut i want to get into moscow.

It's just that we have such a huge lead and dukovany at the moment, had shifted my attention to the only other battle.

It's hard as hell to find a match for Glen Albyn.. 1 vs 1 at least... I've played 3.. 3-0.. but still... i guess all the Euro's are freaking out 'cause of Paris being under attack... been waiting 20mins for a EFEC player on Glen... yawn..

im having trouble finding games too
might go and try again now

Whats your PSN name Sephirdorf?

it's Sephirdorf

alright.. well if you wanna match i added you on the friend list on PSN...

I'm miffed that there's only two games and not a lot of Russians playing Dukovany right now. I'll play tomorrow perhaps.

Stoked that Moscow's nearly surrounded, though. That's great.