Ubi, on PS3 EFEC has been connected to washington for the past like 6 turns. But instead of letting us attack *Moscow*, we are stuck defending the connected territory from the russians OVER AND OVER AGAIN as they are attacking from nowhere.
Now your letting JSF attack *Moscow* as soon as they get in range? Cool.

could you tell me what you think DC means?
cus they dont say moscow DC.
DC is not somting you put after the name of every capital.
its just mosocw.

I hate you.

DC= Da Capital

exactly

quote:

Originally posted by FenrisWolf228:
Ubi, on PS3 EFEC has been connected to washington for the past like 6 turns. But instead of letting us attack *Moscow*, we are stuck defending the connected territory from the russians OVER AND OVER AGAIN as they are attacking from nowhere.
Now your letting JSF attack *Moscow* as soon as they get in range? Cool.

EFEC was never in range to attack Washington. You never conquered Shenandoah or Three Mile Island (those territories are connected).

JSF did conquer the air base that is connected to Moscow (Rovaniemi), which is why we can now attack the capital.


DOBERMAN1 - PS3

not talking about washington... and we have been and still are connected to MOSCOW for the past 5 or 6 turns now.

quote:

Originally posted by DOBERMAN01:

quote:

Originally posted by FenrisWolf228:
Ubi, on PS3 EFEC has been connected to washington for the past like 6 turns. But instead of letting us attack *Moscow*, we are stuck defending the connected territory from the russians OVER AND OVER AGAIN as they are attacking from nowhere.
Now your letting JSF attack *Moscow* as soon as they get in range? Cool.

EFEC was never in range to attack Washington. You never conquered Shenandoah or Three Mile Island (those territories are connected).

JSF did conquer the air base that is connected to Moscow (Rovaniemi), which is why we can now attack the capital.


DOBERMAN1 - PS3

EFEC should have the first fight in Moscow not JSF we have been on that map 4 times in a row, If JSF take Moscow the wars over and thats not fair!!!

Moscow D.C.

Now that IS funny!

we, the EFEC, defends Dukovany on turn 6,7,8,9 & 10 successfully but had never the try to attack moscow. if the JSF wins this war by getting moscow, then there is something very strange with the rules of TOW...

Yeah the battles of Dukovany have been ridiculous, it's definitely not "fair" to the EFEC faction but it is a virtual war so if the JSF wins it i don't really care, it's just the fact they have to do something about the PF and how they are setting up their battles and stuff like that, I'm just curious on why we (EFEC) can't attack Mahilyow considering we have 4 YES FOUR territories connected to and surrounded it lol

quote:

Originally posted by Dipity34:
Yeah the battles of Dukovany have been ridiculous, it's definitely not "fair" to the EFEC faction but it is a virtual war so if the JSF wins it i don't really care, it's just the fact they have to do something about the PF and how they are setting up their battles and stuff like that, I'm just curious on why we (EFEC) can't attack Mahilyow considering we have 4 YES FOUR territories connected to and surrounded it lol

How is it not fair? You pushed towards our capital and came up short, we pushed towars moscow and got there, the only reason you are near moscow in te first place is that you got a bunch of territories from failed Russian atacks, the counter attack mechanic is pretty ridiculous in the first place.

how is fighting the same map 6 times in a row and WINNING every single time not fair? lol get real bro, i'm not saying we should be able to attack moscow straight from there, but atleast let us attack another territory from dukovany instead of making the EFEC defend it the whole time. lol you LOSE a map and get it because of a silly ToW rule, don't kid yourself.

You seem to forget the same risk free attacks your faction got earlier in the war.

that's the whole point, you are rewarded maps you don't win, and have to play maps you do win over and over and over, they just need to fix it or look into something that works better.

risk free my butt, we had to defend each map we got the day after we got it, many times without any support, and we still got it. Not our fault TOW decided to have us on the defensive each time. It's a load of crap that JSF gets access to Moscow after winning something like 2 territories, while EFEC has taken at least 5-6 Russian lands and we are not even within striking distance.

quote:

Originally posted by dominonation:
risk free my butt, we had to defend each map we got the day after we got it, many times without any support, and we still got it. Not our fault TOW decided to have us on the defensive each time. It's a load of crap that JSF gets access to Moscow after winning something like 2 territories, while EFEC has taken at least 5-6 Russian lands and we are not even within striking distance.

Ok first you can't attack moscow because it's not your front line, the only reason you are near there is because of the strange counter attack that gives territories to the defender, you would have to make dukovany your frontline.

And I'm talking about the risk free attacks you made on us early on in the war, if anyone as a right to complain about the attacks from nowhere it's JSF, never in either war ave we been given one, although we've been the target enough times.