All you graw players read! Heck even the devs should read this to.

[streetmarinee]

If you notice ghost recon future soldier is not 1 thing like GRAW thank god!! I member playin ghost recon 2 and summit strike and then after summit strike graw come out and it killed the ghost recon series... There was a new take on ghost recon called advanced warfgihter and it killed ghost recon. I see lots ppl talkn bout ooooo no this game is nothin like GRAW or GRAW 2 well did the devs ever say it was posed to be? No they did not. They never say ghost recon future soldier was posed to be like GRAW in any way.

To me really I think GRFS is part 2 of summit strike. I like how the devs have bring back Ghost Recon to where it was back round 10 years ago, So yea Ghost Recon is back and I hope they do not change the game. I hope they make it more realistic and how ghost recon have always been and give us no respawn option back. I hope they let us have option to disable intel and all this new stuff like cloaking and so on.

This game will sell lots and be a winning game like the devs want it to be if they make this game the way it was set out to be. The way I see it devs.. Do not fix somethin that is not broken.

The game is awesome I enjoy it I do not see what other ppl see.. The assault rifles is awesome. SMG is awesome.. All classes is good. I think this game is well done I just think the players that complain bout them type things like classes etc is just not good at the game.


Also someone say to me there is auto aim in this game.. I do not see no auto aim at all. This game is good as is.


So to all players talkn bout how the game is bad and all these classes is unfair etc.. Do this.. Learn the game.. Learn how to play the game.. And never ever say this game is like CoD cause it is not. CoD= Guns that take no skill to use.. Least in ghost recon the guns have a good amount of kick.. So hush and learn the game before complain bout things like guns and nades etc...

[DanHibikiFanXM]

This game does not look, play, or feel anything like Summit Strike so...don't take this the wrong way but I don't see where you're coming from there?

[streetmarinee]

This game does not look, play, or feel anything like Summit Strike so...don't take this the wrong way but I don't see where you're coming from there?

Yea it does. It has got no modes like summit strike but the way the game feels is just like summit strike. 3 year vet of gr2/summit strike I would know :)

I do not know what it feel like to you but yea this game has went a new way but same feeling how ghost recon should be. I will say that.

[DanHibikiFanXM]

So Summit Strike had a sprint ****on, a cover system, regenerating health, augmented reality, gadgets like sensor grenades and UAVs, maps with obvious bits of chest high cover and right angles, and experience points based progression and unlock system?

[Deathshroud09]

ACR has no recoil.....

[streetmarinee]

So Summit Strike had a sprint ****on, a cover system, regenerating health, augmented reality, gadgets like sensor grenades and UAVs, maps with obvious bits of chest high cover and right angles, and experience points based progression and unlock system?

1. No they did not have sprint

2. They had no cover system but you could stand behind wood etc so in a way cover is cover.

3. I am sure the devs will not release this game without a respawn disable option then there will not be no regeneratin health in non respawn

4. Summit strike was a old game right when socom was around there was no reality to them games it was just the start of that :)

5. sensor nades uavs and all that bs.. Thank the CoD devs they what ruin games with them gadgets... Hope the devs give us a option to disable all that..

6. Maps is good. I like them. I like the sound of maps from africa to the arctic snow!

7. Experience point system.. They done said in private matches all guns is unlocked. :)

[DanHibikiFanXM]

^ Exactly so basically it's nothing like the Summit Strike I poured so many hours into. I mean good that you enjoy the game and have high hopes for it but I still don't see the relation between the two games other than both having "Ghost Recon" in the title.

[TheJackal3]

You basically just explained how it is not like summit strike at all, and they need to add options to make it so.

And I am a Ghost Recon vet of 11 years, I would know. ;)

[SixCuteKittens]

http://rlv.zcache.com/u_s_army_soldier_cat_card-p137667660433370611z857a_400.jpg

[Kaiskune]

you'll have to explain how they are similar, I only played summit strike briefly at a local gaming LAN center (literally called the Xbox warehouse) and I felt i had to earn every last step from mission start to mission finish.

in future soldier you have everything handed to you on a silver plate in comparison... and it lacks a proper squad command system

[Sixgears2]

If you notice ghost recon future soldier is not 1 thing like GRAW thank god!! I member playin ghost recon 2 and summit strike and then after summit strike graw come out and it killed the ghost recon series... There was a new take on ghost recon called advanced warfgihter and it killed ghost recon. I see lots ppl talkn bout ooooo no this game is nothin like GRAW or GRAW 2 well did the devs ever say it was posed to be? No they did not. They never say ghost recon future soldier was posed to be like GRAW in any way.

To me really I think GRFS is part 2 of summit strike. I like how the devs have bring back Ghost Recon to where it was back round 10 years ago

I've been playing Ghost Recon since the original title and I firmly believe that GRAW 2 was the pinnacle of the series in every way other than the campaign (which sucked). No other Ghost Recon has nailed multiplayer, co-op, and that tactical feeling as well as the GRAW games did. They were tactical, slow, thoughtful shooters, and that's why people loved them. GR:FS is nothing like any other game in the series, lacks any semblance of tactics, and plays out on tiny, gamey maps. I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that you have an extremely short attention span (your jumbled, hop-around writing gave that one away) and simply couldn't be bothered to play GRAW as it should be played. Never fear, GR:FS was designed exclusively for people with inability to think or take their time and for younger gamers who have never actually played a real tactical shooter and are therefore unqualified to judge the game as the failure that it is.

The fact that you think that this is going back to the series' roots from ten years ago (which is when the original Ghost Recon came out as a hardcore mil-sim) tells me that you've never actually played any of the earlier GR games. Go find a copy of Island Thunder or even the first GR, play through it, and then you can come on these boards and truthfully tell us that you think GR:FS is in line with the series' origins. As of right now, I'm going to stick with my instinct and assume that you've never actually played more than about 2 hours in the Ghost Recon series up to this point. Ubisoft, pay attention to types of posts you are getting praising your game (jumbled, frantic, and reliant on misinformation about previous games) and those you are getting that criticize it. I think the difference is pretty telling.

[streetmarinee]

I've been playing Ghost Recon since the original title and I firmly believe that GRAW 2 was the pinnacle of the series in every way other than the campaign (which sucked). No other Ghost Recon has nailed multiplayer, co-op, and that tactical feeling as well as the GRAW games did. They were tactical, slow, thoughtful shooters, and that's why people loved them. GR:FS is nothing like any other game in the series, lacks any semblance of tactics, and plays out on tiny, gamey maps. I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that you have an extremely short attention span (your jumbled, hop-around writing gave that one away) and simply couldn't be bothered to play GRAW as it should be played. Never fear, GR:FS was designed exclusively for people with inability to think or take their time and for younger gamers who have never actually played a real tactical shooter and are therefore unqualified to judge the game as the failure that it is.

The fact that you think that this is going back to the series' roots from ten years ago (which is when the original Ghost Recon came out as a hardcore mil-sim) tells me that you've never actually played any of the earlier GR games. Go find a copy of Island Thunder or even the first GR, play through it, and then you can come on these boards and truthfully tell us that you think GR:FS is in line with the series' origins. As of right now, I'm going to stick with my instinct and assume that you've never actually played more than about 2 hours in the Ghost Recon series up to this point. Ubisoft, pay attention to types of posts you are getting praising your game (jumbled, frantic, and reliant on misinformation about previous games) and those you are getting that criticize it. I think the difference is pretty telling.

GRAW was garbage. GRAW 2 was garbage it was a slow pace game. Moving crosshairs round to aim was soooo slow it was horrible and just how slow the player moved round etc was horrible my god GRAW was bad and I hope GRAW 2 was the last of GRAW.

[Sixgears2]

GRAW was garbage. GRAW 2 was garbage it was a slow pace game. Moving crosshairs round to aim was soooo slow it was horrible and just how slow the player moved round etc was horrible my god GRAW was bad and I hope GRAW 2 was the last of GRAW.

Reread my post about you not having the patience or attention span for a true tactical shooter, then read what you just wrote. Thank you for proving my point.

[streetmarinee]

Reread my post about you not having the patience or attention span for a true tactical shooter, then read what you just wrote. Thank you for proving my point.

I come from Socom bro trust me I been there and done that in a tactical shooter that take patience :) You ever set and look at a wall for 6 hours straight in a map calld crossroads if you have not then do not tell me bout havin patience :)

[wombledon]

No offence but this totaly nothing like any previous ghost recons..only the name exists imo.


I dont care if u played 3yrs or 3min...no one will agree with you on that one.sorry.

Ive played them all too for years but i wouldnt try and ram the fact down peoples throats to sound like some sort of authority about gr games lol.


Its the way you have put it fella.like i say no offence but thats abit dumb sounding compairings any gr as there is absolutely nothing the same.




Im happy with the game but cant compair it to any recon until i have played siege in the final game.....this is just another objective shooter at the moment to me,im having a laugh playing at the mo....buy i wont be playing the current game mode atall once siege surfaces.


If i have options i will be happy.its the game mode im interested in not the clunky old days..or comparisons.

Im happy with change........maybe.....i hope.....we will see.ha

[wombledon]

^ Exactly so basically it's nothing like the Summit Strike I poured so many hours into. I mean good that you enjoy the game and have high hopes for it but I still don't see the relation between the two games other than both having "Ghost Recon" in the title.





Nail on head.mist that comment..on stupid hand held..well put

[mnemiki]

Ghost Recon was a sim 10 years ago but I'll tell you what GRAW1&2 were not realistic in anyway, in some cases less so than even GRFS. If you're looking for a mil-sim it'll likely be found in titles like ArmA, OP flashpoint. Those are realistic and I can garuntee you take far more tactics than GR I'd say GR is alot like socom, realistic while retaining the "game" feel. I'm actually impressed with what they did in comparison with GRAW the only thing GRAW has done better however is options and the fact it drew a far more mature fanbase due to it's slow pace along with fully customizable private matches like old school socom. Sadly games now do everything for you or they charge you for that freedom [Battlefield 3 is prime example]. As much hate that goes around this forum why are they here if they hate it so much isn't there GRAW forums still? Reminisce, go back to those games. Alot of socom fans to this day still play the classic, most of the hate are in the socom 2 forums. Please be an adult and leave GRFS forums to those interested/giving feedback.

[streetmarinee]

No offence but this totaly nothing like any previous ghost recons..only the name exists imo.


I dont care if u played 3yrs or 3min...no one will agree with you on that one.sorry.

Ive played them all too for years but i wouldnt try and ram the fact down peoples throats to sound like some sort of authority about gr games lol.


Its the way you have put it fella.like i say no offence but thats abit dumb sounding compairings any gr as there is absolutely nothing the same.




Im happy with the game but cant compair it to any recon until i have played siege in the final game.....this is just another objective shooter at the moment to me,im having a laugh playing at the mo....buy i wont be playing the current game mode atall once siege surfaces.


If i have options i will be happy.its the game mode im interested in not the clunky old days..or comparisons.

Im happy with change........maybe.....i hope.....we will see.ha

I compare the two games never say they was exactly like :) The feelin is though.

[wombledon]

Sorry man i dont understand ...nevermind.i wasnt being a dik,just suprised to read the comparisons.i see none.

Everyone to there own i spose.

[Sixgears2]

I come from Socom bro trust me I been there and done that in a tactical shooter that take patience :) You ever set and look at a wall for 6 hours straight in a map calld crossroads if you have not then do not tell me bout havin patience :)

Whatever you say, "bro." First you say GRAW was "garbage" because it was too slow (despite the fact that it was much, much faster than the older GRs), then you say you played the older SOCOM games even though they were far, far slower and involved sitting in one spot for hours at a time. Contradict yourself much? It doesn't matter anyway since I know you can't have been an avid old-school SOCOM fan; if you were, you'd be screaming bloody murder about GR:FS's failing like the rest of us are, especially after SOCOM 4 crushed your hopes for that series. You are doing a pretty great job of tearing down your own credibility at this stage and illustrating my point about the difference in post quality between the game's supporters and detractors, so I think my work here is done. You enjoy your action game, "bro." Maybe your frat brothers can hop on with you and you can all talk about how hardcore the game is. Ubisoft, welcome to your new community. Hope it was worth it.

[streetmarinee]

Whatever you say, "bro." First you say GRAW was "garbage" because it was too slow (despite the fact that it was much, much faster than the older GRs), then you say you played the older SOCOM games even though they were far, far slower and involved sitting in one spot for hours at a time. Contradict yourself much? It doesn't matter anyway since I know you can't have been an avid old-school SOCOM fan; if you were, you'd be screaming bloody murder about GR:FS's failing like the rest of us are, especially after SOCOM 4 crushed your hopes for that series. You are doing a pretty great job of tearing down your own credibility at this stage and illustrating my point about the difference in post quality between the game's supporters and detractors, so I think my work here is done. You enjoy your action game, "bro." Maybe your frat brothers can hop on with you and you can all talk about how hardcore the game is. Ubisoft, welcome to your new community. Hope it was worth it.

I know plenty of top socomers :) That like how ghost recon future soldier is.

[Sixgears2]

Ghost Recon was a sim 10 years ago but I'll tell you what GRAW1&2 were not realistic in anyway, in some cases less so than even GRFS. If you're looking for a mil-sim it'll likely be found in titles like ArmA, OP flashpoint. Those are realistic and I can garuntee you take far more tactics than GR I'd say GR is alot like socom, realistic while retaining the "game" feel. I'm actually impressed with what they did in comparison with GRAW the only thing GRAW has done better however is options and the fact it drew a far more mature fanbase due to it's slow pace along with fully customizable private matches like old school socom. Sadly games now do everything for you or they charge you for that freedom [Battlefield 3 is prime example]. As much hate that goes around this forum why are they here if they hate it so much isn't there GRAW forums still? Reminisce, go back to those games. Alot of socom fans to this day still play the classic, most of the hate are in the socom 2 forums. Please be an adult and leave GRFS forums to those interested/giving feedback.

So you're only allowed to voice your opinion if you are praising a game's direction or giving positive feedback? Yeah, that seems productive. Many of us were hoping for a true Ghost Recon follow-up, and we've every bit as much right to express our displeasure with the game's state as you do to express your praise of it. You are essentially saying "out with the old fans, we've got to make room for the new ones." What a way to treat loyal customers that have supported a company for more than a decade.

[Bassie52]

If the campaign is a lot harder then it looks, then every GR title has been worth my money..but it's nothing like previous titles..1 month sigh..

[AKA_Lenney]

This game is nothing like Summit Strike. No respawn matches in summit strike needed a ten minute timer to complete b/c the maps were so large. I'd be willing to bet that no respawn games of GR:FS don't even require 3 minutes b/c of the small map size and intel loop.

[JaRuTo]

If new players, socomers, whatever... wants dumb exeperience then so be it, but if developers can't give us, vets options to disable these features and played like in classic Recon style then it's a devs failure. What they can do developers when it publishers dictate to them what targets are the focus of the most in this genre? New Tom Clancy game called Rainbow Six: Patriots will follow in the same direction, that's for sure. I have no illusions that this will happen.
Hopefully, we still have Takedown and ARMA3.
Our last hopes o/

[ArmyRanger6]

If you notice ghost recon future soldier is not 1 thing like GRAW thank god!! I member playin ghost recon 2 and summit strike and then after summit strike graw come out and it killed the ghost recon series... There was a new take on ghost recon called advanced warfgihter and it killed ghost recon. I see lots ppl talkn bout ooooo no this game is nothin like GRAW or GRAW 2 well did the devs ever say it was posed to be? No they did not. They never say ghost recon future soldier was posed to be like GRAW in any way.

To me really I think GRFS is part 2 of summit strike. I like how the devs have bring back Ghost Recon to where it was back round 10 years ago, So yea Ghost Recon is back and I hope they do not change the game. I hope they make it more realistic and how ghost recon have always been and give us no respawn option back. I hope they let us have option to disable intel and all this new stuff like cloaking and so on.

This game will sell lots and be a winning game like the devs want it to be if they make this game the way it was set out to be. The way I see it devs.. Do not fix somethin that is not broken.

The game is awesome I enjoy it I do not see what other ppl see.. The assault rifles is awesome. SMG is awesome.. All classes is good. I think this game is well done I just think the players that complain bout them type things like classes etc is just not good at the game.


Also someone say to me there is auto aim in this game.. I do not see no auto aim at all. This game is good as is.


So to all players talkn bout how the game is bad and all these classes is unfair etc.. Do this.. Learn the game.. Learn how to play the game.. And never ever say this game is like CoD cause it is not. CoD= Guns that take no skill to use.. Least in ghost recon the guns have a good amount of kick.. So hush and learn the game before complain bout things like guns and nades etc...



What game are you playing do think this is ever like GR2SS or any past GR game. You are insulting the classics with this post.

[CounterCellOps]

If you notice ghost recon future soldier is not 1 thing like GRAW thank god!! I member playin ghost recon 2 and summit strike and then after summit strike graw come out and it killed the ghost recon series... There was a new take on ghost recon called advanced warfgihter and it killed ghost recon. I see lots ppl talkn bout ooooo no this game is nothin like GRAW or GRAW 2 well did the devs ever say it was posed to be? No they did not. They never say ghost recon future soldier was posed to be like GRAW in any way.

To me really I think GRFS is part 2 of summit strike. I like how the devs have bring back Ghost Recon to where it was back round 10 years ago, So yea Ghost Recon is back and I hope they do not change the game. I hope they make it more realistic and how ghost recon have always been and give us no respawn option back. I hope they let us have option to disable intel and all this new stuff like cloaking and so on.

This game will sell lots and be a winning game like the devs want it to be if they make this game the way it was set out to be. The way I see it devs.. Do not fix somethin that is not broken.

The game is awesome I enjoy it I do not see what other ppl see.. The assault rifles is awesome. SMG is awesome.. All classes is good. I think this game is well done I just think the players that complain bout them type things like classes etc is just not good at the game.


Also someone say to me there is auto aim in this game.. I do not see no auto aim at all. This game is good as is.


So to all players talkn bout how the game is bad and all these classes is unfair etc.. Do this.. Learn the game.. Learn how to play the game.. And never ever say this game is like CoD cause it is not. CoD= Guns that take no skill to use.. Least in ghost recon the guns have a good amount of kick.. So hush and learn the game before complain bout things like guns and nades etc...

Sorry but graw was and is a great game.


Oh I see you're a pansy *** dev ball sucker. Must be a kid.

[Bassie52]

well that's a bit harsh..the campaign and guerrilla mode look pretty good and we haven't played this MP yet..if there are good teams fighting eatchother and the other maps are really good, then this should be a winner..let's all just wait until the game launches..

[EvilPixieGrrr]

Sorry but graw was and is a great game.


Oh I see you're a pansy *** dev ball sucker. Must be a kid.

Uncalled for. Refrain from this in the future, please.