View Full Version : FW-190 armour
08-15-2005, 10:27 AM
Hi, guys! I want to find out an information about FW-190 armour. You know: front, rear, side, engine and pilot's cabine armour thickness in a various FW-190 models like A-4/5/8/9, D-9 and F-8/G-8. Maybe you also know something about FW-190 armour resistance against some Allied aerial cannons and MGs? Every matter Internet resource is noteworthy to me!
08-15-2005, 10:33 AM
08-15-2005, 10:38 AM
There's a known bug in FW-190 damage model. It will be fixed in few weeks. Don't waste your time.
08-15-2005, 10:45 AM
some info here:
08-15-2005, 10:54 AM
Dont know exact number but Fw190 belong to the best armored fighter of WWII, engine, cockpit and ammo magazines had good armor protection (8-13mm of "wotan" steel). But belly was vulnerable to heavy MG fire.
For ex. La5F weigh (tehe approx the same size fighter) was about 2800kg (wooden spares), Fw190A4=3120 kg (weaponry+about 200kg of armor).
08-15-2005, 11:08 AM
Fw190 armor data (http://pages.sbcglobal.net/mdegnan/_images/190-armor-1.jpg)
That chart list all armor for fighter versions.
For RAF testing of .30/.50/Hispano damage effects look here:
Fw190 Vulnerability (http://pages.sbcglobal.net/mdegnan/_images/190vunerabilityAdj.jpg)
Fw190 Vulnerability 2 (http://pages.sbcglobal.net/mdegnan/_images/190vunerability2adj.jpg)
08-15-2005, 11:42 AM
As a rough indication, assume the FW190 armour is half a metre thinner than that of the Lagg3 http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif
08-15-2005, 02:47 PM
Aaah, thats because Tank used obsolete steel armour, unlike wise soviets, who covered entire planes with plywood armour, you know, the siberian kevlartree plywood http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif
08-15-2005, 04:05 PM
Equal to the KT-40 soviet flying tank be sure!