View Full Version : Winnings not being recorded? I.E. Springfield JSF
01-05-2009, 05:22 PM
last night on turn 31 shortly after the bug was fixed The JSF took lead on 3 locations; ft. Campbell, Shenandoah Valley and most importantly Springfield. The colliding front lines was on Springfield however even though it says on the end war world map that we held off on Springfield we still lost it and therefore lost the other two wins we would of had. How does this make any since. YOu can clearly see that JSF won on Springfield yet we still lost the territory and therefore much ground. I'm wandering if anyone else noticed this because this is simply wrong.
01-05-2009, 05:34 PM
the PF is the territory with the most game played between the two factions. not what that stupid annoucer says.
01-05-2009, 05:40 PM
online on the 360 endwar it said springfield was the PF. if it wasnt then how are people supposed to know what is the PF to fight on?
01-05-2009, 06:07 PM
It was a colliding front line.
This has been going on for ove a week now, the way the territories are laid out in that battle the only two fights that matter are Springfield and Grissom, Shenandoah and Campbell have no relevance.
Yes, the JSF won Springfield, as they do every single time. However Russia won Grissom, and by a sizable margin, as they do every single time.
Russia won Grissom by more than the JSF won Springfield and therefore due to the colliding front-line rule they take a victory on both.
In taking Springfield they surround Shenandoah and Campbell and win both of those, regardless of how either battle went.
01-05-2009, 06:09 PM
That's the problem everyone been complaining about. You don't know the PF until the end of a turn.
But you can just about guess its a map where one of the two factions have support and the other one don't. ex. grissom and uss regan. The biggest noobs maps this past week.