The First War Officially Ends on Xbox 360

[QuidProKuo]

After careful consideration the EndWar dev team has decided to bring the First War on the Xbox 360 to a conclusion. We'll be doing this by changing the victory conditions from 30 territories and three capitals to 30 territories and only two capitals. This will make the European Federation Enforcer Corps the official winner of the First War. Congratulations guys!

We're doing this so that we can get as many people as possible back into playing EndWar over the upcoming weekend when we start up the second war. We know there has been some frustration with people replaying the same territories over and over again and this is the best way to get EndWar players facing each other on new territories.

We hope the Spetsnaz Guard Brigade players understand why we went with this decision and want to assure all EndWar gamers that during the entire First War we were completely hands-off with the TOW system. Everything that has happened in the TOW up till now has been fully automated by the TOW system.

The end of the First War will be followed by a 24 hour EndPhase. This will give everyone a chance to check out how the war unfolded using the Theater of War viewer at www.endwargame.com/tow (http://www.endwargame.com/tow). The second war will be starting shortly after the EndPhase. All battalion experience levels, ranks, and upgrades will be kept. If you have any questions, feel free to post them on the forums.

Most importantly, the dev team would like to let each of you know that all your feedback has been invaluable. EndWar has been incredibly fortunate to have such a dedicated, passionate, and intelligent group of gamers. Keep it up and keep on gaming!

[BOE85]

While some will be disappointed, you did what you had to do in ending the War and keeping everyone interested. Thanks for the information. Any chance you'll give out more credits as incentive to get players to join other factions so that JSF isn't the most used?

[YhuuzanVong]

Nice, I was getting bored...

[Foxhound5]

thank you for the informative update. Very glad to see that you guys are taking the time to review the gamer's suggested improvements and open the game back up to those who may have put it on hold.

[Chocks-Away1959]

Thanks for the update it has been sort of fun.

I was hoping Btlns would be reset.

I'm a casual player, and as I don't fancy torturing myself constantly running up against maxed out players I think this game is now a trader.

So long and good luck.

[Pal87]

PS3 next please? and soon

[Wilbo39]

the informative update. Very
awesome. any chance there will be a reward for the winning faction?

[zoomboy2442]

NOOOOOOO!!!! That means that the playing feild will not be leveled (meaning ranks and credits
) and I will still be a mediocre player against much higher enemies. Oh well, this will let me get some practice time in. Can't wait till the next war.

[anarkymonkey]

we need to be able to keep buying things like sweet camos and/or other essentially useless things like the prestige mode in COD4 to keep it fun. Also i think the first day of the first war we should be able to fight on all of the maps possible;arrabida,Glen Albyn, reagan sea base, grissom, okefenokee, jfk, ft. levski, carpathia, mahilyow, istra, matera and thessaly and rondane. Yea its a lot of fighting, but its war baby. The germans in ww2 fought against russia everywhere they could.

Like what happened at the end of the first war, you have to capture both sides to have anything change. Noone would have an unfair advantage and it would move the war along. I hated the last war when the spz could only fight on one map, when we could have fought on about 5-6. Then if a stalemate occured, then the fighting stop would there.

[USAFAB]

And the credits roll after the end of war? k.

Give my props to the devs for memorializing Erick Wujcik.

[xenocidic]

Originally posted by Chocks-Away1959:
Thanks for the update it has been sort of fun.

I was hoping Btlns would be reset.

I'm a casual player, and as I don't fancy torturing myself constantly running up against maxed out players I think this game is now a trader.

So long and good luck.
casual players should be the happiest that battalions are retained.

if there was a reset, the hard core players will be fully upgraded in a week, and the casual players would just be where they are now.

[LacisGhost]

Thanks. Even though I am an SGB player, I wanted this to end and have a new war. For the next war, I hope we can have a smaller war with easier winning conditions. That should keep things more interesting. And when possible make sure there are not 3 assaults for the SGB to choose from. with 5 gametypes and 39 maps, I hope the variety each night stays as large as possible.

Thanks again, I think we all knew this is what had to happen at this stage!

[xxxStalinxxx]

WHAT THE HELL

WE DIDN'T LOSE

MOSCOW WASN'T TAKEN

MALE IT A DRAW BETWEEN EUROPA AND RUSSIA

NOT A EUROPA VICTROY!!!!!!!!!

WTF

[SkywalkerDSP]

Originally posted by xxxStalinxxx:
WHAT THE HELL

WE DIDN'T LOSE

MOSCOW WASN'T TAKEN

MALE IT A DRAW BETWEEN EUROPA AND RUSSIA

NOT A EUROPA VICTROY!!!!!!!!!

WTF

I shall explain in 3 sentences.

SGB attacks D.C. = Fail.
EFEC attacks D.C. = Win.

Therefore, EFEC = Win.

[AnGe11iK]

Originally posted by xxxStalinxxx:
WHAT THE HELL

WE DIDN'T LOSE

MOSCOW WASN'T TAKEN

MALE IT A DRAW BETWEEN EUROPA AND RUSSIA

NOT A EUROPA VICTROY!!!!!!!!!

WTF

Blert.

Sky go on the halobox

[MrRandom004]

Sky(Raptor) is not going to like this http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_mad.gif
But there's always the 2nd war http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif

[JAGX]

What a victory, the rules of the game were changed midwar.

It's like playing risk and saying the game is over after one person controls N. America! What an experience: cheating, bugs, premature victory, and no patches.

I hope the second war will be better... and then lets not forget about how Ubi screwed up the game mechanics by totally shut down the Eastern Front! http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif

[dman9623]

I agree with ending the war early I was getting tired of fighting the same maps all the time, plus there was no way the Spetsnaz would come back down 21 territories. They should allow us to attack on any map and they need to get rid of the connected territories, it should not be if you lose one map you could possibly lose one or two maps. There need to add sea battles for the port maps that would add another element to the war. I like changing the war parameters from capturing 3 capitals plus 30 maps, The war would have never ended. Overall I am happy with the game wish there wasn't so long of waits for game but that is because everyone joined the JSF maybe they should limit how many per faction that way its even.

[dman9623]

To JAGX you must be on PS3 Xbox 360 I didn't run into anyone joining the game and just not fighting, but I do know there were alot of kids like 10-11 years old that had no idea what to do or would take over one uplink and keep all there units at that uplink. They should not allow people to create second accounts or switch factions in the middle or a war. I have seen a couple people fight on all three factions.

[AgentMulder1989]

I strongly disagree this. Two simple changes could have extended the war. First of all, the lack of battlefield could have been solved by opening up more fronts. Many times two bordering regions would not be contested. Secondly, the JSF players could be given the choice to join either the Euros or Russia.

The objective of Endwar is world domination. How can a force claim dominance while another still holds a strong position? Most Russian players like myself feel slighted. We still had the chance to take back positions, but were denied the chance.

And another point...

All battalion experience levels, ranks, and upgrades will be kept.

What the??? Have you guys read the boards? There is a major problem of balance in the game. New players try to aid their side, only to be crushed by enemies with vastly superior units. This is well known, so why won't you guys reset the ranks and experience? Doing this will allow all players a fresh start and will create a much better environment.

[jlindyman]

Originally posted by AgentMulder1989:
New players try to aid their side, only to be crushed by enemies with vastly superior units. This is well known, so why won't you guys reset the ranks and experience? Doing this will allow all players a fresh start and will create a much better environment.

pro-tip: upgrade your units to compete with superior units*

*credit to Stav_44's strategy guide, available on Amazon for $30.

[HRR Mute]

Originally posted by AgentMulder1989:
What the??? Have you guys read the boards? There is a major problem of balance in the game. New players try to aid their side, only to be crushed by enemies with vastly superior units. This is well known, so why won't you guys reset the ranks and experience? Doing this will allow all players a fresh start and will create a much better environment.

What exactly would a reset accomplish? Balance the playing field for 72 hours, maybe? Or do we reset every time a new copy of the game is sold? The only people a reset would help would be the very guys you're complaining about, as they'll quickly be maxed out, again, and the casual player will lose the 10 upgrades he managed to scrape up during the first war.

[Death174]

I'm glad they won't reset I joined the war later into it and I was able to win with all basic units it just takes good tactics and plus I do not want to lose what i have gained

[AnGe11iK]

Originally posted by JAGX:
What a victory, the rules of the game were changed midwar.

It's like playing risk and saying the game is over after one person controls N. America! What an experience: cheating, bugs, premature victory, and no patches.

I hope the second war will be better... and then lets not forget about how Ubi screwed up the game mechanics by totally shut down the Eastern Front! http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif

Either they change the victory to what it should be, or JSF dont get to play for another month while we beat russia?

[thehighlife88]

We understand you called the war. We also understand that in an effort to save Europe from an embarrassing upset the victory conditions were changed. On the flip side I hope that JSF comes ready this next war. Hopefully this prevents Europe from focusing all their fire on them and completely ignoring the SGB again.

[ismokeyjoei]

Originally posted by QuidProKuo:
After careful consideration the EndWar dev team has decided to bring the First War on the Xbox 360 to a conclusion. We'll be doing this by changing the victory conditions from 30 territories and three capitals to 30 territories and only two capitals. This will make the European Federation Enforcer Corps the official winner of the First War. Congratulations guys!

We're doing this so that we can get as many people as possible back into playing EndWar over the upcoming weekend when we start up the second war. We know there has been some frustration with people replaying the same territories over and over again and this is the best way to get EndWar players facing each other on new territories.

We hope the Spetsnaz Guard Brigade players understand why we went with this decision and want to assure all EndWar gamers that during the entire First War we were completely hands-off with the TOW system. Everything that has happened in the TOW up till now has been fully automated by the TOW system.

The end of the First War will be followed by a 24 hour EndPhase. This will give everyone a chance to check out how the war unfolded using the Theater of War viewer at www.endwargame.com/tow (http://www.endwargame.com/tow). The second war will be starting shortly after the EndPhase. All battalion experience levels, ranks, and upgrades will be kept. If you have any questions, feel free to post them on the forums.

Most importantly, the dev team would like to let each of you know that all your feedback has been invaluable. EndWar has been incredibly fortunate to have such a dedicated, passionate, and intelligent group of gamers. Keep it up and keep on gaming! i think that they should reset all ranks and units beacuse all of the people who gotthe game before other peolpe will have an advantage e.g the game was released in america before britan what is unfair because the americans were o it 24/7 for the first week and got most of there troops upgraded what was un fair

[xenocidic]

would that have been like the embarassment of RSGB going from 20 territories down to 10 and then even lower to 7 ?

yea...

just accept the fact that you lost, the whining is very petty

[Hoplyte]

You can make some of the people happy some of the time, but not all of the people happy all of the time.

For every complaint, there is another side of the coin with people happy with the decision. Like ending the war early. I would have loved taking Moscow (which was closer to happening than losing Paris) but everything was trapped in a stalemate until some raids happened. Don't think this helped EFEC, this was for JSF (ie half the players). Besides, it's closer to solo-campaign rules, which I think are better. The only mistake was not having 30 spaces/2 caps to begin.

Glad upgrades stay. I was not a top-tier 12-ranker, but it still would have sucked playing all those rounds over to get all that cash back to get all those upgrades and xp again. No thank you, I like to keep what I earn, and the lower rank guys will too when they spend more time in-game.

On to 2nd war.

[insane521]

Originally posted by xenocidic:
would that have been like the embarassment of RSGB going from 20 territories down to 10 and then even lower to 7 ?

yea...

just accept the fact that you lost, the whining is very petty
All this whinging is really getting annoying I might go to JSF just to be on a team that doesn't have people who think they are Russian and like vodka.

[kevin22]

what the **** http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_mad.gif russia was pushing into europe and what you won in dc then how come i had over 20 wins gaist yous in a row then a finally got bet and evry russian palyer a asked said the were kicking europas *** the europa team is weak i steam roled them in like evry game and ho cares about the jsf players if they wont a game join a diffrent team http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_mad.gifthe only people that are getting bored are the ones ho are losing jsf http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_mad.gif

[GREENEGUY_2000]

Originally posted by insane521:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by xenocidic:
would that have been like the embarassment of RSGB going from 20 territories down to 10 and then even lower to 7 ?

yea...

just accept the fact that you lost, the whining is very petty
All this whinging is really getting annoying I might go to JSF just to be on a team that doesn't have people who think they are Russian and like vodka. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

some of us on the jsf realy like vodka

[Noskills360]

Russia is reeeealy mad now!
JSF is accepting it so they can start over
EFEC is partying because it would have been a heck of a long haul to Moscow with SPZ heavy armor and weapons in assault mode.
SPZ it was unexpected but not unfair. it will be the same for the following wars so it's not like Ubi change the rules cause they wanted EFEC to win they wanted it to be sort and sweet and not lose 100 ppl per game because one team would have to sit there being occupied. they did it more for the JSF than for EFEC!

And to Ubi: it took a lot of guts to do that good job! i can see how hard it must have been. And don't worry, no matter how many out spoken whiners there are, there is always twice as many silent supporters! GO UBISOFT!

http://img399.imageshack.us/img399/8165/mybanner493375d99f0beik8.jpg (http://www.mybannermaker.com/link.php?nurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mybannermaker.com)
the future of The Future

21st Assault Battalion-blitzkrieg battle strategies

[R6ex]

No reset of ranks & upgrades etc.?

Oh no ... does a new casual player have to lose 30 times and get his/her units killed over & over again for 30 matches before he/she can start enjoying the game a little?

Guess this is a game meant only for the hardcore players. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/disagree.gif

[USAFAB]

How long until the next war starts? And why is there no cheapo Quick Match either in the TOW or better yet in Skirmish mode? Just something to bide the time and play against other humans before the next war starts.

[jlove17]

Originally posted by kevin22:
what the **** http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_mad.gif russia was pushing into europe and what you won in dc then how come i had over 20 wins gaist yous in a row then a finally got bet and evry russian palyer a asked said the were kicking europas *** the europa team is weak i steam roled them in like evry game and ho cares about the jsf players if they wont a game join a diffrent team http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_mad.gifthe only people that are getting bored are the ones ho are losing jsf http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_mad.gif

Please learn some grammar. This was done for JSF- they're half of the players. I think that battalions should be reset after wars- this will give people a chance to switch factions without being penalized.

[InsanitiesEdge]

you devs say that you had nothing to do with TOW up to this point. well one question that everyone been asking and i have always been wondering...... WHY was the euro and russian front lines shut off for no reason?? went from battles on both lines to just american..... what kind of crud is that???? an explination would be greatly appreciated.

[deltatp586]

I have some quick questions UBI. What happens to the TOW (Theatre Of War) players who were part of the JSF faction when their capital got taken?Do they start over when the world war resets or can they do something else?

[bl_78]

Cheating exists. SGB showed their hand early in ToW. EFEC + JSF cheaters focused on the leading SGB in early ToW. Here's a little math I recorded the time it took to get 10 losses twice in DC. 1: (5:23min)2: (7:15min). I rounded to 6min. 60 minutes divided by 6min multiplied by 10 losses equals 100 potential losses for DC.(60/6)(10)=100.

Reason why we never took DC was because certain individuals in both efec and jsf did not like the idea of us taking the capital so they created dummy accounts like this fool who posted in our SGB thread.

"
Originally posted by insane521:

quote:
Originally posted by BerserkNurple:
ay guys i got this amazing strat for all our maps....

1.ok ok so at the beginning you make NOTHING BUT GUNSHIPS (DO NOT TAKE ANY UPLINKS)

2. make sure all of your CP is spent on gunships and you cant buy anything else!

3. THIS IS CRUCIAL: send ALL OF YOUR GUNSHIPS AT THE NEAREST (or largest) group of TRANSPORTS you can find.

4. avoid all tanks and artillery

5. TRUST ME THIS WORKS its amazing

insane521:

WOW your so cool, what faction do you belong to eh?

BerserkNurple:

duh im russian im trying to show you my super good strategy"

He also stated
"no but it only works if you are SGB i dont know why just do it. ESPECIALLY on maps that are important"

Possible reason why america fell so quickly was this time SGB and EFEC cheaters gained up on JSF.

Possible reason why EFEC pushed Russia out & Russian started taking ground back with Jsf knocked out jsf cheaters would either A: switch faction or B: just wait for the next war and conceit defeat C: continue their ways(If i did do this and I only had the capital Id give up would you?). Then SGB and EFEC cheaters canceled each other out giving the last few days of ToW true endwar playing.

Cheating existed in the territories that had the most fighting,"ESPECIALLY on maps that are important"(BerserkNurple,SGB Thread, Page 6, Wed December 03 2008 17:49) In places that battles were slow or non-existent show true battle percentages. percentages gained from populated territory are unreliable and fraudulent.

A simple daily loss limit of 15 for each territory for a day would solve any cheaters who use dummy accounts like
BerserkNurple.

If any dev see's this, a filter for the leader boards should be created to see the stats from worst to best or " top worst players. So we could report and ban obvious cheaters. Also see true influence of cheaters.

To Anybody who thinks interverence from Ubisoft is wrong. I don't know what to tell you. They should police this game.

My words are based on that cheating is a widespread problem but will always have two faction ganging on one till there two where it cancels each other out and the true war begins.

Also it may seem there hiding matches that well that also can be true. But personally delaying the Xml feed will be good I generally miss the days I didn't know about supad.net or its duplicate site out there.

Now for all Naysayer's and or people who feel like they herd enough the burden of proof is now on you. Can anyone on this forum prove to me cheating doesn't exist and or doesn't have a heavy influence? Can anyone? I have provided 1 such cheater BerserkNurple and could find many more with an adjustment to the leader boards to see the worst players . If people complain on a forum its really not meant for you unless addressed to you but for the devs and hopefully they'll do something.

I don't know if the 3 min time would stop BerserkNurple particular manipulation to help their real faction.

[AgentMulder1989]

What exactly would a reset accomplish? Balance the playing field for 72 hours, maybe? Or do we reset every time a new copy of the game is sold? The only people a reset would help would be the very guys you're complaining about, as they'll quickly be maxed out, again, and the casual player will lose the 10 upgrades he managed to scrape up during the first war.

Hardly. I think the ranks should be reset once. Endwar will never have the sales it did at launch. The problem is that players that were unable to get Endwar on day one are at a significant disadvantage.

I have most of the upgrades for my units, and 90% of the time I can roll my opponents simply because of the upgrades. The game has become boring, constantly matching me with newer players.

As for the whole cheating thing, I have seen it happen first hand. I always wondered why the Russians seemed poised to take DC, winning by hundreds of battles, but somehow lost in the end. Guess that explains it.

[Angry_Toaster]

Originally posted by kevin22:
what the **** http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_mad.gif russia was pushing into europe and what you won in dc then how come i had over 20 wins gaist yous in a row then a finally got bet and evry russian palyer a asked said the were kicking europas *** the europa team is weak i steam roled them in like evry game and ho cares about the jsf players if they wont a game join a diffrent team http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_mad.gifthe only people that are getting bored are the ones ho are losing jsf http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_mad.gif

1) do you know how hard that was to read?

2) Russia would have had to take all of Europe and America, do you have any idea of how long that would have taken?

3) Suck it up, you lost, get the **** over it.

[bl_78]

Its funny how you ask for proof and people skip you lol

[RyAndress]

Originally posted by kevin22:
what the **** http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_mad.gif russia was pushing into europe and what you won in dc then how come i had over 20 wins gaist yous in a row then a finally got bet and evry russian palyer a asked said the were kicking europas *** the europa team is weak i steam roled them in like evry game and ho cares about the jsf players if they wont a game join a diffrent team http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_mad.gifthe only people that are getting bored are the ones ho are losing
jsf http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_mad.gif

HAHA you weren't pushing into Europe you were fighting for your lives to get bAck Russian territory that was taken by Eu earlier in the war ...

[Leet2012]

Originally posted by kevin22:
what the **** http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_mad.gif russia was pushing into europe and what you won in dc then how come i had over 20 wins gaist yous in a row then a finally got bet and evry russian palyer a asked said the were kicking europas *** the europa team is weak i steam roled them in like evry game and ho cares about the jsf players if they wont a game join a diffrent team http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_mad.gifthe only people that are getting bored are the ones ho are losing jsf http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_mad.gif
Did you ever ask a EF player how many wins they were getting. Lol we won because our 27% was smarter than the other 50% get over it you lost.

[troopew4arrior]

For those who played as the europeans. There are a lot of you who think that u had russia beat, when we in fact defeneded most of our vital territories the entire game. And most were panzies and rarely fought russia in a territory where the europeans didnt have both supports available to them, but thats ok because thats strategy. Now im not sure as to the integrity of the rumor but i heard that there was a lot of people who would make two accounts and purposefly lose to europe to gain that territory and i dont have a hard time believing that because america was taken over in a matter of 5 turns which is rediculous to think that europe could manage such a feat. But i do beleive that in the end it was better for this war to end because this way its a fresh start and hopeuflly most of the problems we faced in the first war will cease.

[Angry_Toaster]

Originally posted by troopew4arrior:
For those who played as the europeans. There are a lot of you who think that u had russia beat, when we in fact defeneded most of our vital territories the entire game. And most were panzies and rarely fought russia in a territory where the europeans didnt have both supports available to them, but thats ok because thats strategy. Now im not sure as to the integrity of the rumor but i heard that there was a lot of people who would make two accounts and purposefly lose to europe to gain that territory and i dont have a hard time believing that because america was taken over in a matter of 5 turns which is rediculous to think that europe could manage such a feat. But i do beleive that in the end it was better for this war to end because this way its a fresh start and hopeuflly most of the problems we faced in the first war will cease.

Its funny how every single russian forgets about the first half of the war... http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/51.gif

[GunnerWolf1812]

If you're not going to reset ranks/battalions, then there needs to be some sort of "Economic Bailout" to lower ranked players <5-6.

I've had the game since release, but for various reasons wasn't able to play constantly, and as such I'm only Rank 4. It is impossible to advance, as even when I'm outmanuvering/outthinking my enemy, I'm often crushed simply by his superior upgrades. Every loss gets me a measly 50,000 credits, which isn't worth the unavoidable units I've had KIA. I can't buy upgrades of my own to counter, so I'm stuck in a perpetual cycle of futile battles and inevitable losses. The game simply isn't fun.

And before you say "lurn2pl4y nub", there's something wrong when 2 gunships can't beat 1 tank.

[shadows0fintent]

come on guys, its just a game.

more people wanted to be the americans because of their superior weapons and people chose russia because of their brute strength. its their own choice if they chose the losing side.

as for america, they stood up well against the european onslaught, they held up for atleast 30 turns, good for them. you do not see them complaining do you.

as for russia, each team started with 15 areas and they at the last time i looked got down to 8, at the same time europe had 30+. most of the people on the russian team said that given more time they would have won. no, if europe was fighting in the middle and still beat back america how do you think russia will be when we focus everything at russia. just face it you are sore losers. and one more thing, dont say you were pushing into europe i have looked at the map and we were well into your area.

to ubisoft, thank you for ending the war early, i was getting bored with the same maps, thanks for standing up for what you think is right, if they want to win next time they should play better and win more rounds instead of upgrading the attacks and not their defences.

shame on you russia, making everyone else look bad, better luck next time USA, i want them to win and show russia, reply if you agree

[shadows0fintent]

by the way the remarks about russia are mainly aimed at people like kevin22 who you can see further up the page in a quote. that is what i am basing my statement on. sorry for any of the good players.

[Destroya22]

I will Play as JSF again since they are my favorite faction and i only got to play them for about a week and when i started playing we only had D.C i was very suprised but anyway, In WAR 2 JSF will be Victorious http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

[SEMPERTENEO]

i'll find it funny if the hardcore EFEC players here get vindictive and go full assault on Russia and Russia falls fast.

i'm just going to take my time enjoying playing again...

[LostMando88]

To every Russian player out there who is complaining about the First War. Shut your mouths! I am damn proud to fight for Russia against worthy adversaries from both the EFEC and the JSF. The War starts again, the only talking you should be doing....is giving orders over your mic.

[Tretiak]

i look forward to crushing the skulls of my enemies with my tanks at the next war. i grew tired of fighting fo the same territories over and over again, and i don't completely agree with the way TOW is setup, but the new way is better.

[arahdial]

What matters is that we get to play, rather than who won or lost the war.

[troopew4arrior]

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Angry_Toaster:


Its funny how every single russian forgets about the first half of the war...

I said we defended most of our vital spots there were 7 that you never laid foot into, but that may have changed we will never know the outcome of that war so lets move on with the next one shall we. I think that the americans will now be able to regroup, and there wont be as much boosting going on so we will see how tihs next war turns out.

[bluenova123]

I say reset unit ranks but NOT upgrades but thats just me.

[xoblivionx2008]

Nice to see 360 end there war now ho about PS3 I'm getting dead tired fighting on colliding front lines and playing on same maps. Also when will the 3 minute rule take place since i see player lag out and i just leave too when that happens and that usually happens before the three minute mark so it wouldn't count false victory's.

[ethealmighty]

good the wars over remember russians, you wernt the ones losing it was the americans so stop complaining you came in second the americans arent and they are the only ones who should be http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/shady.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/shady.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/shady.gif

[dman9623]

Looks like the JSF will be out of the war for xbox 360 by the end of the week. The Russians are hiding behind their air strikes take their off map supports away and they are nothing we will take Moscow and DC this time.

[bluediamonds]

Glade I'm on ps3 still in the first war turn 44 Jsf just turn the tide completly on the Russians.

[SOD_Money_Gang]

Btlns should be reset and upgrades striped. Veteran officers go in with a HUGE advantage.

[jhaley13]

Dear Ubisoft,

I have been an avid player of endwar since the game came out and I must say that I absolutely LOVE it. Unfortunately, I am writing in regards to an issue that is affecting multipls factions in varying ways. This is the attack from nowhere rule in TOW.

Simply using Reagan seabase as an example, the attack from nowhere rule is making it extremely frustrating for players of both the EEFC and the JSF. It is as some of you may know, currently a stale mate due to no progress in either direction. The EEFC players keep trying to take the territory, and are unfortunately repaid by having their squads consistently beaten and countless units killed. However, despite the consistent winning at the seabase for the JSF, they are not allowed to counterattack, for example, Glen Albyn, which is the source of the european attack, or Wilstermarsch, which they could easily do from Copenhagen, which the JSF had held for several turns without using it at all.

Thus, since reagan has been a great place for the JSF newcomers to build up their forces since their winning percentage is so high, not to mention a fun place for the JSF AND the EEFC to play, it has consistently been the JSF primary front. However, since it is considered an attack from nowhere, there is no forward progress ANYWHERE for the JSF, and the best they can do is attempt to hold on to the territories they have, and then slowly lose them, which is what the JSF has been doing now for the majority of war 2.

I am speaking as someone not representing any faction, because while this rule is certainly frustrating for the JSF, it also affects the ability of the Europeans to have a shot of making a better offensive in the northern US or at least to have the JSF come to eruopean territory and have their units killed for a change.

Ubisoft, you guys have done a wonderful job making corrections from war 1 to war 2 in order to make the playing more fair and fun for everyone. Please, PLEASE continue to provide excellent service to your players by getting rid of the attack from nowhere rule so that there can be an end to the stalemate in the northern US and a chance for the JSF to gain a territory

[hogdude]

Crap, I was hoping on waiting for all battalions to be reset. Looks like that won't happen and better get started on my first TOW tour. See ya'll on the field.

[Sonereal]

There will never be a reset unless TOW is changed significantly in how its played.