View Full Version : Cooldown on airstrikes
Echaz
05-28-2009, 02:20 PM
Hey,
It would seriously awesome if you devs would just look at this as a little goodie for the next patch!
Okay, those airstrike spammers are seriously starting to **** me off, and I bet alot of other people is aswell.
So it would be really awesome if you guys could just put a cooldown on airstrikes like 2 minutes cooldown on airstrikes! I would kiss your feet a thousand times if you added that!
No airstrike spammers are welcome to post in this thread, thank you.
Best Regards
-Echaz
ravenuk1
05-28-2009, 03:39 PM
Good Point
b_4721
05-28-2009, 03:51 PM
Maybe you should learn how to counter it? If you let the other team keep enough spare CP to literally spam mission supports you are doing something wrong and would loose regardless of mission supports.
Anyways electronic warfare is much deadlier in the right hands.
Echaz
05-29-2009, 09:37 PM
Yeah, true and I know how to counter it thank you.
But still if your playing a assault you basicly got no chance against a guy with high ranked units while you got 1-3 stripes and he keeps air striking you, that means asta la vista..
Anyway theres a counter for the counter on the air strikes so there's not really any real good counter unless we get a cooldown.
GUNNER2629
05-30-2009, 10:34 AM
Ya lvl 1 should really only destroy 1 health bar not 2
Echaz
05-30-2009, 08:13 PM
Nice to see that someone actually supports this. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-wink.gif
b_4721
05-31-2009, 08:06 PM
I thought you pc gamers were supposed to be more "hardcore" RTS players, yet here we have whiners all the same as on the consoles?
Echaz
06-01-2009, 11:52 AM
Originally posted by b_4721:
I thought you pc gamers were supposed to be more "hardcore" RTS players, yet here we have whiners all the same as on the consoles?
HAHA, are you supposed to be funny? Come on shut it.. The only reason I write this is to get rid of your kind of people air strikes spammers. I bet you are one since you write that kind of bull****. If you didn't notice EndWar community is dying and Airstrike spamming is probably one of the many reasons!
b_4721
06-01-2009, 06:02 PM
Originally posted by Echaz:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by b_4721:
I thought you pc gamers were supposed to be more "hardcore" RTS players, yet here we have whiners all the same as on the consoles?
HAHA, are you supposed to be funny? Come on shut it.. The only reason I write this is to get rid of your kind of people air strikes spammers. I bet you are one since you write that kind of bull****. If you didn't notice EndWar community is dying and Airstrike spamming is probably one of the many reasons! </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/bigtears.gif
GUNNER2629
06-02-2009, 01:37 AM
Originally posted by b_4721:
I thought you pc gamers were supposed to be more "hardcore" RTS players, yet here we have whiners all the same as on the consoles?
Dude your a moron it you think airstrikes should able to use every 4 seconds.
You are probably a airstike noob and dont understand this.Your probably a JSF usally they spam the most
b_4721
06-02-2009, 09:48 PM
Originally posted by GUNNER2693:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by b_4721:
I thought you pc gamers were supposed to be more "hardcore" RTS players, yet here we have whiners all the same as on the consoles?
Dude your a moron it you think airstrikes should able to use every 4 seconds.
You are probably a airstike noob and dont understand this.Your probably a JSF usally they spam the most </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Cmon do I have to repeat the http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/bigtears.gif ..?
Don't be such a baby and learn to play around it instead of crying over it
Echaz
06-03-2009, 05:51 AM
Well, I don't want to start a fight here.
Everyone has their own opinion and point of view on things.
B_4721 is just somewhat of a ******* when it comes to explaining things, cause the only guys I still havent found a real way to beat up fast is airstrike spammers because they just take you out with airstrikes before you can get through their frontline and get their uplinks.
The first post by B_4721 is mature rest of them isn't, I think he doesnt know how to handle disagreements.
Having an Airstrike coming every 25 seconds isnt realistic either.
jeroldthemouse
06-03-2009, 09:30 PM
try taking out their uplinks if you don't want to get hit by it
b_4721
06-03-2009, 09:50 PM
Originally posted by Echaz:
Well, I don't want to start a fight here.
Everyone has their own opinion and point of view on things.
B_4721 is just somewhat of a ******* when it comes to explaining things, cause the only guys I still havent found a real way to beat up fast is airstrike spammers because they just take you out with airstrikes before you can get through their frontline and get their uplinks.
The first post by B_4721 is mature rest of them isn't, I think he doesnt know how to handle disagreements.
Having an Airstrike coming every 25 seconds isnt realistic either.
Call me what you want, it doesn't change the fact you are whining about a basic function of the game.
Like I said before, if you let your opponent to keep 8 CP to use a airstrike seconds after the last then you are doomed already, that's your problem not the games.
madefalpha
06-04-2009, 07:39 AM
B_4721 is just somewhat of a ******* when it comes to explaining things, cause the only guys I still havent found a real way to beat up fast is airstrike spammers because they just take you out with airstrikes before you can get through their frontline and get their uplinks. There are a couple of counters to airstrikes, a deepstrike to the opponents upgraded links works, I've also used Arty to take out the uplink (they still control it but it cant be upgraded). If you're quick enough you can intercept the airstrike with an EW strike (this is most succefully done from the sitrep map and when playing 2vs2 or 4vs4)