Tango_2_0
06-04-2009, 08:03 AM
Why weren't we given the freedom to select these things in ranked mode...?
Start method
Game end score
Game time
The only explanation I heard so far is that Ubi wanted ranked to be "fair". However, the REALLY big glitches get by anyway, like booster-quitters who boost their stats by bailing on losing games and CTD gamers playing Bastion games with extenstion upon extension, agreeing not to cap the diamond.
Notorious cheaters have been on the boards for ages, and noone did anything about them. Therefore, I argue that "fairness" is not a factor here.
Shouldn't we, who run the servers, be allowed to decide ALL settings?
Thank goodness for PB's tasks engine. Without that, the ranked game would die with the 1.03 update and Ubi taking away the "all ready" start option.
Start method
Game end score
Game time
The only explanation I heard so far is that Ubi wanted ranked to be "fair". However, the REALLY big glitches get by anyway, like booster-quitters who boost their stats by bailing on losing games and CTD gamers playing Bastion games with extenstion upon extension, agreeing not to cap the diamond.
Notorious cheaters have been on the boards for ages, and noone did anything about them. Therefore, I argue that "fairness" is not a factor here.
Shouldn't we, who run the servers, be allowed to decide ALL settings?
Thank goodness for PB's tasks engine. Without that, the ranked game would die with the 1.03 update and Ubi taking away the "all ready" start option.