PDA

View Full Version : UBISOFT. I am concerned even more.



maxpontiac
07-16-2008, 01:25 PM
Wow. Everytime I start to get excited about this game, I read some stuff like this.

Assitance mode?
Throw me in a blimp so I can not calculate my maneuvers? I am willing to give this a chance before passing any harsh judgements. Could be something interesting, or it could be somthing that removes a virtual pilot from any immersion gained prior to the blimp cam activation.

EMP blast?
Blazing Angels 2 weapons, didn't we learn??? Why put in a super weapon? Takes the spirit of air to air combat away. You know, guns, missiles, and BFM? What's next? Smokescreens? Leave the defensive countermeasures to the pilots skills.

Repair Drone?
I can hear the pilots now.
Pilot 1 - "Hammer 3-3, heading 270 degrees to repair UAV"
Pilot 2 - "Lead, Roger, egress northwest"
Pilot 3 - "Hammer 3-2, Tally, visual, bandit right, 2 miles low."
Pilot 2 - "Lead, 3-3 shall disregard transmision by 3-2, and procede to UAV."
Pilot 1 - "Hammer 3-3, missile 1 mile low right, ETA, 35 seconds.."
Pilot 2 - "Lead, Roger, fire EMP, jink left, the UAV will auto heal aircraft"
Sounds rediculous, doesn't it? The prospect of a repair drone in a flight combat game is absurd.

This is pushing the limit to far IMO, and doing nothing but catering to the HALO type crowd.

The aforementioned SHOULD be options that are available for the NUGGETS and not a forced feature set, because I (as well as majority of members here) am not interested in playing a flight game that makes Ace Combat look realistic.

You developers should listen to reason, and have an option for EVERYTHING you can think of, and when you do have that list compiled, come to the MB's around the net and LISTEN to the gamers before finishing the game.

Please don't make this about WHAT YOU WANT TO DO. Plus, if I am way off based, please feel free to correct me?

In closing, I hope that the delay in the game is due the devs addressing the issues that have been brought up in this forum..

johna713
07-16-2008, 09:56 PM
HAHA that sounds ridiculus, why in the world would you have a drone when you are a pilot, i mean its not ghost recon. and what the heck a drone????? your flying 20,000 feet with a drone. didnt uisoft heard of a sattelite, or awacs, you dont need a drone when your up high, you can see everything... and a freaking EMP, thats ridiculus!!!! if somebod use EMP would the enemy just crash to the ground, and it would feel easy to kill an enemy.. it feels like cheating for me using an EMP, and it feels like no chalenge for me.....
let me guess whats next, a magnetic bullet, a bullets that follows enemy where ever it goes haha thats sounds phatetic, and cool

Tomcatter61
07-17-2008, 02:59 PM
That doesn't sound cool at all. Sounds lame.

maxpontiac
07-18-2008, 10:42 AM
Gentlemen.

I appreciate your acknowledgement in my point.

I am not saying that this stuff is wrong to put in a video game.

I also understand the subtlety of creating a product that will appeal to the masses.

I am just PLEADING that the devs involved in this project take adding options into consideration so sales are not missed.

There should be just as big of concern when it comes to losing sales when they are trying to net more!!

psykiller
07-18-2008, 12:47 PM
please do something with the blazing angels series! make it more realistic, use real skins and real firepower ratings. the p51 with 50cal mg was devastating. please, i love ww2 aircraft games, and you have the groundwork laid in ba1 just improve on it! let us customise the planes ie the guns and skins, and no more guided missles and defensive weapons. be historically accurate! just go through the history books, and youve got the game made for you. and please include all the planes, p40,p38,p47,p51,wildcat,hellcat,corsair,and include the variants, thea,b,c's razorbacks and such. please my hopes are in your hands!

The M00PS
07-18-2008, 01:10 PM
Originally posted by psykiller:
please do something with the blazing angels series! make it more realistic, use real skins and real firepower ratings. the p51 with 50cal mg was devastating. please, i love ww2 aircraft games, and you have the groundwork laid in ba1 just improve on it! let us customise the planes ie the guns and skins, and no more guided missles and defensive weapons. be historically accurate!

This should get you excited:

http://xbox360.ign.com/dor/objects/14258704/il-2-sturmo..._trailer_060608.html (http://xbox360.ign.com/dor/objects/14258704/il-2-sturmovik-birds-of-prey/videos/24f_il2_trailer_060608.html)

http://games.teamxbox.com/xbox-360/2037/IL2-Sturmovik-Birds-of-Prey/

TemplarComander
07-18-2008, 02:52 PM
What do you me by 'catering to the Halo type crowd'?

maxpontiac
07-18-2008, 03:03 PM
Originally posted by TemplarComander:
What do you me by 'catering to the Halo type crowd'?

What do I mean?

For example..

Anybody, including children can play Halo. It's easy to pick up, learn, and shoot.

On the other hand, a child would not be able to pick up a flight sim.

All I am saying is, don't dumb the game down to a level where knowledge of flight becomes a non-factor.

Include EVERYTHING that caters to ALL individuals who might purchase this title.