View Full Version : Russian armor
LordTenacious
07-15-2007, 02:40 PM
Not sure if this Russia or not but here is a screenie I found
Screenie Fo Rizzle (http://www.1up.com/do/slideshow?pager.offset=5&p=&g=&tr=&mt=0&cId=3158955)
muttbut
07-15-2007, 03:06 PM
Originally posted by LordTenacious:
Not sure if this Russia or not but here is a screenie I found
Screenie Fo Rizzle (http://www.1up.com/do/slideshow?pager.offset=5&p=&g=&tr=&mt=0&cId=3158955)
EU forces...
Holy-Mouse
07-15-2007, 08:36 PM
Now that's a Russian http://media.1up.com/media?id=3319847&type=lg
LordTenacious
07-15-2007, 08:39 PM
Maybe I'm wrong. But can we get some ID's on these armor pieces?
On a side note, theres the Luxor obelisk I was talking about in another thread. Looks like I was right about the specific location of the battle of the trailer (Place de la Concorde, Paris).
Huzzah.
LordTenacious
07-15-2007, 08:47 PM
Just noticed something potentially interesting in that picture I posted. If look behind the apcs on the right, there is some more armor with rocket launchers mounted on them. Interesting. Very, very interesting.
Everytime I look at these pictures I notice more detail. Same thing happened when I watched the trailer too.
SkyRaptorRUS
07-16-2007, 09:52 AM
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW! http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/11.gifAwesome tanks! THose tanks will make all enemy units wet their pants just by looking at them. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/59.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/touche.gif
I love the design, the spines and "evilish" red lights...
And how could someone think those are EU tanks? - That's a classical western minded design for "evil Russiy tank"
http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif
SEAL_VI
07-16-2007, 11:20 AM
Looks ok, but I'd love to see a Merkava.
SEAL VI
Peace
SkyRaptorRUS
07-16-2007, 11:25 AM
Originally posted by SEAL_VI:
Looks ok, but I'd love to see a Merkava.
SEAL VI
Peace
http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/winky.gif Israel in ENDWAR? hehehehe LOL
SEAL_VI
07-16-2007, 11:43 AM
Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SEAL_VI:
Looks ok, but I'd love to see a Merkava.
SEAL VI
Peace
http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/winky.gif Israel in ENDWAR? hehehehe LOL </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
No, but it would be nice. The Merkava has that futuristic look to it.
SEAL VI
muttbut
07-16-2007, 12:17 PM
Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW! http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/11.gifAwesome tanks! THose tanks will make all enemy units wet their pants just by looking at them. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/59.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/touche.gif
I love the design, the spines and "evilish" red lights...
And how could someone think those are EU tanks? - That's a classical western minded design for "evil Russiy tank"
http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif
The first photo he was talking about was the EU, Swedish CV90-120's, French VBCI IFV's, Italian/UK Merlin helicopters, ect http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif
Tjuube
07-20-2007, 10:08 AM
Originally posted by muttbut:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW! http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/11.gifAwesome tanks! THose tanks will make all enemy units wet their pants just by looking at them. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/59.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/touche.gif
I love the design, the spines and "evilish" red lights...
And how could someone think those are EU tanks? - That's a classical western minded design for "evil Russiy tank"
http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif
The first photo he was talking about was the EU, Swedish CV90-120's, French VBCI IFV's, Italian/UK Merlin helicopters, ect http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Not to be picky, but that tank is most likely the German original version, which is the kind that sweden bought and modified.
muttbut
07-20-2007, 04:22 PM
Originally posted by Tjuube:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by muttbut:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW! http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/11.gifAwesome tanks! THose tanks will make all enemy units wet their pants just by looking at them. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/59.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/touche.gif
I love the design, the spines and "evilish" red lights...
And how could someone think those are EU tanks? - That's a classical western minded design for "evil Russiy tank"
http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif
The first photo he was talking about was the EU, Swedish CV90-120's, French VBCI IFV's, Italian/UK Merlin helicopters, ect http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Not to be picky, but that tank is most likely the German original version, which is the kind that sweden bought and modified. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
You mean the Leo2, which Sweden calls the Strv122, thats not the one I'm tlking about mate, the CV90-120 is the modified CV90 IFV mounted with a turret and 120mm gun, making it a light tank http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif
Legoholic
07-26-2007, 01:24 AM
Originally posted by SEAL_VI:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SEAL_VI:
Looks ok, but I'd love to see a Merkava.
SEAL VI
Peace
http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/winky.gif Israel in ENDWAR? hehehehe LOL </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
No, but it would be nice. The Merkava has that futuristic look to it.
SEAL VI </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
It doesnt even have to be israely... I mean canada just bought 80 Leopard 2 A6M main battle tanks, why couldnt the USA, EU, Or Russia just buy them, or better yet, STEAL them!
PrinceCaspian5
07-26-2007, 08:36 AM
Originally posted by Legoholic:
It doesnt even have to be israely... I mean canada just bought 80 Leopard 2 A6M main battle tanks, why couldnt the USA, EU, Or Russia just buy them, or better yet, STEAL them!
they wouldn't need to, the US has the Abrams, why would they want to buy a leopard 2, the EU has Germany, they make the leopards so they wouldn't need to by them, and Russia has tones of tanks, they don't need to buy any more
SkyRaptorRUS
07-26-2007, 09:48 AM
Originally posted by PrinceCaspian5:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Legoholic:
It doesnt even have to be israely... I mean canada just bought 80 Leopard 2 A6M main battle tanks, why couldnt the USA, EU, Or Russia just buy them, or better yet, STEAL them!
they wouldn't need to, the US has the Abrams, why would they want to buy a leopard 2, the EU has Germany, they make the leopards so they wouldn't need to by them, and Russia has tones of tanks, they don't need to buy any more </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
40 000 new tanks including prototypes will be bought by 2015 by Russian Army. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_confused.gif Looks like there is a reason for buying 40K new tanks besides having ton of them
LordTenacious
07-26-2007, 11:10 AM
Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by PrinceCaspian5:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Legoholic:
It doesnt even have to be israely... I mean canada just bought 80 Leopard 2 A6M main battle tanks, why couldnt the USA, EU, Or Russia just buy them, or better yet, STEAL them!
they wouldn't need to, the US has the Abrams, why would they want to buy a leopard 2, the EU has Germany, they make the leopards so they wouldn't need to by them, and Russia has tones of tanks, they don't need to buy any more </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
40 000 new tanks including prototypes will be bought by 2015 by Russian Army. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_confused.gif Looks like there is a reason for buying 40K new tanks besides having ton of them </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
40,000....holy **** dude. The world is seriously gearing up for war.
SkyRaptorRUS
07-26-2007, 11:32 AM
I can sure you + it will not be Russia, who'll launch a first attack http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_confused.gifbut yes..this world is hearing up fir a great war...and the last war there ever will be
LordTenacious
07-26-2007, 03:18 PM
Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
I can sure you + it will not be Russia, who'll launch a first attack http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_confused.gifbut yes..this world is hearing up fir a great war...and the last war there ever will be
Unless this next war kills every single human, it will not be last war.
Inquisitor_Zeal
07-26-2007, 06:55 PM
Holy http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_eek.gif, that is a lot of tanks!
Secondly, when a 3rd 'great' war occurs, i dont think it will end off mankind, but who knows, it really depends on whos fighting who and what its being faught over(but most likely the first option)Since if all the countries that have nuclear weapons are against each other then it will be an 'Endwar' IMO. And lastly to who wrote the Canadians shouldnt buy the Leo2 tank since the Americans have the Abrams...(im hoping you were talking about in the game)but Canada has its own army http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_eek.gif shocking eh? and we(Canada) dont seem to want to produce our own MBT so we buy the Leo tanks from Germany, (but i think we should get the Abrams from the states)so we actually need to get our tanks from somewhere and not relie(sp??) on the US to defend us, since who knows we could end up fighting each other one day (cross fingers and knocks on wood for that not happening)
Ps. sorry for the hige run on sentences, i dont like putting in periods http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif
LordTenacious
07-26-2007, 07:33 PM
As I recall, the United States does not sell the Abrams to other countries.
pointandlaugh
07-26-2007, 09:24 PM
Originally posted by Inquisitor_Zeal:
[huge run-on]
Legoholic was saying that the US should buy some Merkavas, and was using Canada buying some Leopard 2's as an example.
Caspian was saying the US doesn't need to buy Merkavas because they have Abrams (how do you plural Abrams?).
Nobody was saying that Canada doesn't have a military (although quite a few americans think that).
PrinceCaspian5
07-26-2007, 09:30 PM
Originally posted by Inquisitor_Zeal:
And lastly to who wrote the Canadians shouldnt buy the Leo2 tank since the Americans have the Abrams...(im hoping you were talking about in the game)but Canada has its own army http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_eek.gif shocking eh? and we(Canada) dont seem to want to produce our own MBT so we buy the Leo tanks from Germany, (but i think we should get the Abrams from the states)so we actually need to get our tanks from somewhere and not relie(sp??) on the US to defend us, since who knows we could end up fighting each other one day (cross fingers and knocks on wood for that not happening)
Firstly, I wasn't saying that Canada shouldn't get the tanks, I was answering this part of the post
Originally posted by Legoholic:
why couldnt the USA, EU, Or Russia just buy them, or better yet, STEAL them!
Secondly, I know that Canada has an army, I am Canadian, and we need all the tanks we can get, we only have 66 tanks tanks that are about 30 years old, and we won't be able to get spare parts for them for much longer, so they will have to be put out of service (we also have 20 tanks that are on loan from Germany until we get the 40 we bought from the Netherlands), we have already bought 40 from the netherlands, and may eventuially buy up to 60 more bringing our total number or tanks up to 100
muttbut
07-27-2007, 03:48 PM
Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by PrinceCaspian5:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Legoholic:
It doesnt even have to be israely... I mean canada just bought 80 Leopard 2 A6M main battle tanks, why couldnt the USA, EU, Or Russia just buy them, or better yet, STEAL them!
they wouldn't need to, the US has the Abrams, why would they want to buy a leopard 2, the EU has Germany, they make the leopards so they wouldn't need to by them, and Russia has tones of tanks, they don't need to buy any more </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
40 000 new tanks including prototypes will be bought by 2015 by Russian Army. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_confused.gif Looks like there is a reason for buying 40K new tanks besides having ton of them </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Could I ask where Russia is supposed find the cash for 40k tanks, or better yet, the steel to make them, they have other things to do then build 40000 paperweights, even at the height of the CW they didn't have 40k of tanks in frontline service, seriously what would they do with them, park them in storage, they have huge underground bunkers out East that still have T34-85's in mint condition in them, 400 maybe, 4000 unlikely, 40000 no,
muttbut
07-27-2007, 03:49 PM
Originally posted by LordTenacious:
As I recall, the United States does not sell the Abrams to other countries.
Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Austrlia have Abrams
Inquisitor_Zeal
07-27-2007, 04:43 PM
Ok sorry for miss understandinghttp://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif
I thought that the armour in question in the picture was actually the French Leclarec tank is it not or are we sure it is the Swed's because I thought that the Leclarec would make more sense (sorry for my spelling) as well those are perhaps Mirage 2000 fighters in the sky or maybe I have mistaken them too...
SkyRaptorRUS
07-28-2007, 12:21 AM
Originally posted by muttbut:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by PrinceCaspian5:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Legoholic:
It doesnt even have to be israely... I mean canada just bought 80 Leopard 2 A6M main battle tanks, why couldnt the USA, EU, Or Russia just buy them, or better yet, STEAL them!
they wouldn't need to, the US has the Abrams, why would they want to buy a leopard 2, the EU has Germany, they make the leopards so they wouldn't need to by them, and Russia has tones of tanks, they don't need to buy any more </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
40 000 new tanks including prototypes will be bought by 2015 by Russian Army. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_confused.gif Looks like there is a reason for buying 40K new tanks besides having ton of them </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Could I ask where Russia is supposed find the cash for 40k tanks, or better yet, the steel to make them, they have other things to do then build 40000 paperweights, even at the height of the CW they didn't have 40k of tanks in frontline service, seriously what would they do with them, park them in storage, they have huge underground bunkers out East that still have T34-85's in mint condition in them, 400 maybe, 4000 unlikely, 40000 no, </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
oil and gas sellings, growing military budget
No matter how big your budget gets its still not going to allow you to afford to buy all those tanks, and there isn't enough resources for them.
SkyRaptorRUS
07-28-2007, 09:18 AM
Originally posted by TFCC:
No matter how big your budget gets its still not going to allow you to afford to buy all those tanks, and there isn't enough resources for them.
there is still 8 years left before they all are going to be bought...
Let's just wait and see...40K new tanks - is good. They will replace old soviet ones
Still come on 40K tanks, unless there is a stockpile of massive resources somewhere, the budget exists of money they pluck out of thin air, and the EEC and JSF are infact on a team (have to be to counter 40K tanks), I think they will be hard pressed to get them all, not saying its completely impossible (it is a video game), just that I think its highly unlikely.
muttbut
07-28-2007, 12:52 PM
Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by muttbut:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by PrinceCaspian5:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Legoholic:
It doesnt even have to be israely... I mean canada just bought 80 Leopard 2 A6M main battle tanks, why couldnt the USA, EU, Or Russia just buy them, or better yet, STEAL them!
they wouldn't need to, the US has the Abrams, why would they want to buy a leopard 2, the EU has Germany, they make the leopards so they wouldn't need to by them, and Russia has tones of tanks, they don't need to buy any more </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
40 000 new tanks including prototypes will be bought by 2015 by Russian Army. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_confused.gif Looks like there is a reason for buying 40K new tanks besides having ton of them </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Could I ask where Russia is supposed find the cash for 40k tanks, or better yet, the steel to make them, they have other things to do then build 40000 paperweights, even at the height of the CW they didn't have 40k of tanks in frontline service, seriously what would they do with them, park them in storage, they have huge underground bunkers out East that still have T34-85's in mint condition in them, 400 maybe, 4000 unlikely, 40000 no, </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
oil and gas sellings, growing military budget </div></BLOCKQUOTE>Ok, Russia is going to spend all of it's new found wealth on tanks? the avarage Russian tanks price tag is about 1 million, actually more but let's be conservative, 40k x 1 000,000 comes out at 40 Billion, thats just for tanks, not aircraft ships subs maintenence, missiles ect, 40 billion on tanks alone, unrealistic in the extreme
Thats exactly my point, it is going to be hard to pull of saying that they bought 40K tnaks (no meantiance or ammo) and still have money to hire crew, gas, infantry, resources, aircraft, helos, ships, porduction, etc. Its very unlikely.
SkyRaptorRUS
07-28-2007, 02:46 PM
Originally posted by muttbut:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by muttbut:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by PrinceCaspian5:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Legoholic:
It doesnt even have to be israely... I mean canada just bought 80 Leopard 2 A6M main battle tanks, why couldnt the USA, EU, Or Russia just buy them, or better yet, STEAL them!
they wouldn't need to, the US has the Abrams, why would they want to buy a leopard 2, the EU has Germany, they make the leopards so they wouldn't need to by them, and Russia has tones of tanks, they don't need to buy any more </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
40 000 new tanks including prototypes will be bought by 2015 by Russian Army. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_confused.gif Looks like there is a reason for buying 40K new tanks besides having ton of them </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Could I ask where Russia is supposed find the cash for 40k tanks, or better yet, the steel to make them, they have other things to do then build 40000 paperweights, even at the height of the CW they didn't have 40k of tanks in frontline service, seriously what would they do with them, park them in storage, they have huge underground bunkers out East that still have T34-85's in mint condition in them, 400 maybe, 4000 unlikely, 40000 no, </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
oil and gas sellings, growing military budget </div></BLOCKQUOTE>Ok, Russia is going to spend all of it's new found wealth on tanks? the avarage Russian tanks price tag is about 1 million, actually more but let's be conservative, 40k x 1 000,000 comes out at 40 Billion, thats just for tanks, not aircraft ships subs maintenence, missiles ect, 40 billion on tanks alone, unrealistic in the extreme </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
around 500 billion dollars are spent on this..so it's real..I've heard it many times on TV..
LordTenacious
07-28-2007, 07:03 PM
On a side note, awesomest picture of T-90.
http://fofanov.armor.kiev.ua/Tanks/MBT/t-90_mob1.jpg
5 bucks says the driver was saying "WHEE!!"
SkyRaptorRUS
07-28-2007, 09:51 PM
Originally posted by LordTenacious:
On a side note, awesomest picture of T-90.
http://fofanov.armor.kiev.ua/Tanks/MBT/t-90_mob1.jpg
5 bucks says the driver was saying "WHEE!!"
This was from mid 90 military show. I've heard that after seying how T-90 was jumping from hills, americans tried to do the same in their Abrams. M1A1 crew broke their bones! http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_eek.gif
That doesn't matter M1A1 crews still could destroy T-90's in a flash.
Mr.Hanky2005
07-29-2007, 09:19 AM
Originally posted by TFCC:
That doesn't matter M1A1 crews still could destroy T-90's in a flash.
http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/agreepost.gif
No M1 Abrams crewman has ever been killed due to enemy action.
That was my point the M1A1 Abrams is one of the best tanks in the world, personally I highly dislike modern Russian tanks, one of the reasons I will play as the Americans
muttbut
07-29-2007, 10:42 AM
Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by LordTenacious:
On a side note, awesomest picture of T-90.
http://fofanov.armor.kiev.ua/Tanks/MBT/t-90_mob1.jpg
5 bucks says the driver was saying "WHEE!!"
This was from mid 90 military show. I've heard that after seying how T-90 was jumping from hills, americans tried to do the same in their Abrams. M1A1 crew broke their bones! http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_eek.gif </div></BLOCKQUOTE>Russian military dog and pony shows are notorious, 1/3 fuel on board, no ammo, jacked up suspension, same thing they do with aircrat to make their maouverability seem better, 1/2 fuel, clean wings no tanks ect...got ot sell the things remember http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif
muttbut
07-29-2007, 10:46 AM
Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by muttbut:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by muttbut:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by PrinceCaspian5:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Legoholic:
It doesnt even have to be israely... I mean canada just bought 80 Leopard 2 A6M main battle tanks, why couldnt the USA, EU, Or Russia just buy them, or better yet, STEAL them!
they wouldn't need to, the US has the Abrams, why would they want to buy a leopard 2, the EU has Germany, they make the leopards so they wouldn't need to by them, and Russia has tones of tanks, they don't need to buy any more </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
40 000 new tanks including prototypes will be bought by 2015 by Russian Army. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_confused.gif Looks like there is a reason for buying 40K new tanks besides having ton of them </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Could I ask where Russia is supposed find the cash for 40k tanks, or better yet, the steel to make them, they have other things to do then build 40000 paperweights, even at the height of the CW they didn't have 40k of tanks in frontline service, seriously what would they do with them, park them in storage, they have huge underground bunkers out East that still have T34-85's in mint condition in them, 400 maybe, 4000 unlikely, 40000 no, </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
oil and gas sellings, growing military budget </div></BLOCKQUOTE>Ok, Russia is going to spend all of it's new found wealth on tanks? the avarage Russian tanks price tag is about 1 million, actually more but let's be conservative, 40k x 1 000,000 comes out at 40 Billion, thats just for tanks, not aircraft ships subs maintenence, missiles ect, 40 billion on tanks alone, unrealistic in the extreme </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
around 500 billion dollars are spent on this..so it's real..I've heard it many times on TV.. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
I've heard Elvis is alive and that aliens have had love children with fat trailer thrash "women" in bum**** Alabama...on TV...don't believe everything you hear
SkyRaptorRUS
07-29-2007, 12:23 PM
Originally posted by muttbut:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by muttbut:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by muttbut:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by PrinceCaspian5:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Legoholic:
It doesnt even have to be israely... I mean canada just bought 80 Leopard 2 A6M main battle tanks, why couldnt the USA, EU, Or Russia just buy them, or better yet, STEAL them!
they wouldn't need to, the US has the Abrams, why would they want to buy a leopard 2, the EU has Germany, they make the leopards so they wouldn't need to by them, and Russia has tones of tanks, they don't need to buy any more </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
40 000 new tanks including prototypes will be bought by 2015 by Russian Army. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_confused.gif Looks like there is a reason for buying 40K new tanks besides having ton of them </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Could I ask where Russia is supposed find the cash for 40k tanks, or better yet, the steel to make them, they have other things to do then build 40000 paperweights, even at the height of the CW they didn't have 40k of tanks in frontline service, seriously what would they do with them, park them in storage, they have huge underground bunkers out East that still have T34-85's in mint condition in them, 400 maybe, 4000 unlikely, 40000 no, </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
oil and gas sellings, growing military budget </div></BLOCKQUOTE>Ok, Russia is going to spend all of it's new found wealth on tanks? the avarage Russian tanks price tag is about 1 million, actually more but let's be conservative, 40k x 1 000,000 comes out at 40 Billion, thats just for tanks, not aircraft ships subs maintenence, missiles ect, 40 billion on tanks alone, unrealistic in the extreme </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
around 500 billion dollars are spent on this..so it's real..I've heard it many times on TV.. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
I've heard Elvis is alive and that aliens have had love children with fat trailer thrash "women" in bum**** Alabama...on TV...don't believe everything you hear </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Out MINISTER OF DEFENCE SAID THIS o_O
Viguier1989
07-29-2007, 01:33 PM
Nowaday Russia has more than 22,800 main battle tank, so maybe in 2015 they will have 40000. But I don't think if they have 40,000 that all will be operational in time of peace.
SkyRaptorRUS
07-29-2007, 01:37 PM
Originally posted by Viguier1989:
Nowaday Russia has more than 22,800 main battle tank, so maybe in 2015 they will have 40000. But I don't think if they have 40,000 that all will be operational in time of peace.
Unless there's a war
LordTenacious
07-29-2007, 08:09 PM
Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by LordTenacious:
On a side note, awesomest picture of T-90.
http://fofanov.armor.kiev.ua/Tanks/MBT/t-90_mob1.jpg
5 bucks says the driver was saying "WHEE!!"
This was from mid 90 military show. I've heard that after seying how T-90 was jumping from hills, americans tried to do the same in their Abrams. M1A1 crew broke their bones! http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_eek.gif </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Wouldn't surprise me if this was true. M1A1 isn't designed for jumping. The Abrams chassis is made for stabilty over extremely rough and steep terrain, but not jumping.
muttbut
07-30-2007, 09:49 AM
Originally posted by Viguier1989:
Nowaday Russia has more than 22,800 main battle tank, so maybe in 2015 they will have 40000. But I don't think if they have 40,000 that all will be operational in time of peace.
As I said Russia has vast undergrund storage bunkers full of mint condition T-64s/72s/ect ect, they have them on paper, doesn't mean they can throw them into action tommorrow, war reserve....although T72's are not reeally considered MBT's anymore, they are out classed by every modern tank, the Russian only have a few hundred T-80 and 90's
muttbut
07-30-2007, 09:52 AM
Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by muttbut:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by muttbut:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by muttbut:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by PrinceCaspian5:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Legoholic:
It doesnt even have to be israely... I mean canada just bought 80 Leopard 2 A6M main battle tanks, why couldnt the USA, EU, Or Russia just buy them, or better yet, STEAL them!
they wouldn't need to, the US has the Abrams, why would they want to buy a leopard 2, the EU has Germany, they make the leopards so they wouldn't need to by them, and Russia has tones of tanks, they don't need to buy any more </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
40 000 new tanks including prototypes will be bought by 2015 by Russian Army. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_confused.gif Looks like there is a reason for buying 40K new tanks besides having ton of them </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Could I ask where Russia is supposed find the cash for 40k tanks, or better yet, the steel to make them, they have other things to do then build 40000 paperweights, even at the height of the CW they didn't have 40k of tanks in frontline service, seriously what would they do with them, park them in storage, they have huge underground bunkers out East that still have T34-85's in mint condition in them, 400 maybe, 4000 unlikely, 40000 no, </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
oil and gas sellings, growing military budget </div></BLOCKQUOTE>Ok, Russia is going to spend all of it's new found wealth on tanks? the avarage Russian tanks price tag is about 1 million, actually more but let's be conservative, 40k x 1 000,000 comes out at 40 Billion, thats just for tanks, not aircraft ships subs maintenence, missiles ect, 40 billion on tanks alone, unrealistic in the extreme </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
around 500 billion dollars are spent on this..so it's real..I've heard it many times on TV.. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
I've heard Elvis is alive and that aliens have had love children with fat trailer thrash "women" in bum**** Alabama...on TV...don't believe everything you hear </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Out MINISTER OF DEFENCE SAID THIS o_O </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Yes, your point?, he's a politican and I don't care if the Pope said it, 40,000 tanks is unlikly, Russia can't even get it's main naval units to sea in good shape or keep it's pilots up on flight hours and they are going to spend 10's of billions on tanks, this is not WWII the day of Kursk size battles is gone, you mobilize tanks in huge numbers, all they are are targets for airpower....for what logical purpose?
muttbut
07-30-2007, 10:07 AM
Just to put it in perspective, the US has 8000 Abrams, they are decreasing that to around 5500, the PLA has about 11000 2/3's of which are compleatly obsolete Type-59's and Type-69's, they have small numbers of Type-89 and 96's, their future tank whuich is now in low rate production is the Typre-99, of which they plan to buy about 2000, this for an army considerably larger then Russia's, with a far larger economy, population ect....if Russia gets even a 1/4 of that 40K, I'll eat my socks
SkyRaptorRUS
07-30-2007, 10:28 AM
http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/11.gifThis sounds so good. Thank you God Putin is rebuilding our army that Yelcin destroyed. The bigeest country in the world must have mightiest army http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/59.gif - TO DEFEND ITSELF!
Listen guys, I', just telling you what I've heard. We have the biggest tank army anyways.
Oh and about old naval ships and little number of fuel - this is coming to an end. Army - is the main project of the goverment. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/25.gifRUssia will be reborn as always! And one day there will peace on Earth http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif
Viguier1989
07-30-2007, 03:36 PM
In 1981 Russia made 2500 tanks, so if they make 2500 by years during eight years, (for 2015) they will make 20000 tanks, so with there 22800 tanks that they have nowaday it's possible to have 40000 tanks. And in 1981 the Soviet had a less important GDP than Russia today, so with a part of Military expenditure less important in the budget, Russia can make many tanks, probably less than 2500 by year but many.
LordTenacious
07-30-2007, 05:31 PM
Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
And one day there will peace on Earth http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif
When Russia is wiped from the face of the Earth.
ZING!
SkyRaptorRUS
07-30-2007, 08:45 PM
Originally posted by LordTenacious:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
And one day there will peace on Earth http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif
When Russia is wiped from the face of the Earth.
ZING! </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Only after your country! http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_mad.gif
BTS_Thor_2
07-31-2007, 11:20 AM
Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by muttbut:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by muttbut:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by muttbut:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by PrinceCaspian5:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Legoholic:
It doesnt even have to be israely... I mean canada just bought 80 Leopard 2 A6M main battle tanks, why couldnt the USA, EU, Or Russia just buy them, or better yet, STEAL them!
they wouldn't need to, the US has the Abrams, why would they want to buy a leopard 2, the EU has Germany, they make the leopards so they wouldn't need to by them, and Russia has tones of tanks, they don't need to buy any more </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
40 000 new tanks including prototypes will be bought by 2015 by Russian Army. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_confused.gif Looks like there is a reason for buying 40K new tanks besides having ton of them </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Could I ask where Russia is supposed find the cash for 40k tanks, or better yet, the steel to make them, they have other things to do then build 40000 paperweights, even at the height of the CW they didn't have 40k of tanks in frontline service, seriously what would they do with them, park them in storage, they have huge underground bunkers out East that still have T34-85's in mint condition in them, 400 maybe, 4000 unlikely, 40000 no, </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
oil and gas sellings, growing military budget </div></BLOCKQUOTE>Ok, Russia is going to spend all of it's new found wealth on tanks? the avarage Russian tanks price tag is about 1 million, actually more but let's be conservative, 40k x 1 000,000 comes out at 40 Billion, thats just for tanks, not aircraft ships subs maintenence, missiles ect, 40 billion on tanks alone, unrealistic in the extreme </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
around 500 billion dollars are spent on this..so it's real..I've heard it many times on TV.. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
I've heard Elvis is alive and that aliens have had love children with fat trailer thrash "women" in bum**** Alabama...on TV...don't believe everything you hear </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Out MINISTER OF DEFENCE SAID THIS o_O </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
500 billion dollars....500 BILLION DOLLARS. Well this is false because America's military budget is about 475 billion dollars which is 50% of all the military budgets in the world combine. So, Russia doesnt even come close their military budget is up there with Chinas around 100 billion actually little higher around 125 billion. So unless your "goverment" is going to spend half their budget on just tanks.....not likely I think they are lieing to you.
PrinceCaspian5
07-31-2007, 12:09 PM
are you sure it was 500 billion dollars? I was just looking it up and this site (http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/putin-proposes-22-increase-for-official-fy-2006-russian-defense-budget-01058/) said that Russia's defense budget was 668.3 billion rubles, which (at current excange rates) equals about 26 billion USD
SkyRaptorRUS
07-31-2007, 12:50 PM
Originally posted by PrinceCaspian5:
are you sure it was 500 billion dollars? I was just looking it up and this site (http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/putin-proposes-22-increase-for-official-fy-2006-russian-defense-budget-01058/) said that Russia's defense budget was 668.3 billion rubles, which (at current excange rates) equals about 26 billion USD
damn I'm sick of this stuff
hmm..maybe but don't forget. If your Abrams for examplecosts about 11 miilion dollars than our T-90 - one million dollars. We may have less money but our weapons are cheaper http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif
But then put a M1A1 Abrams versus a T-90, and the 11 millions dollars pays off and crushes the T-90 into little bits, moving on to the next T-90 commander, who thinks he has what it takes(being sadly mistaken).
ObssesdNuker
08-01-2007, 05:22 AM
Actually, the T-90, firepower-wise, may be more then a match for the Abrams. Their probably equal mobility-wise, but armor-wise I would give it to the Abrams.
GETTING BACK ON TOPIC!
It appears that the Russian tank for EndWar will either be a derivative of the T-80UM2(AKA: 'The Black Eagle') or that T-95 which is rumored to be in development.
Oh, and Russia would be better off recycling all of those T-55s it owns into better tanks/civilian cars.
SkyRaptorRUS
08-01-2007, 07:35 AM
Originally posted by ObssesdNuker:
Actually, the T-90, firepower-wise, may be more then a match for the Abrams. Their probably equal mobility-wise, but armor-wise I would give it to the Abrams.
GETTING BACK ON TOPIC!
It appears that the Russian tank for EndWar will either be a derivative of the T-80UM2(AKA: 'The Black Eagle') or that T-95 which is rumored to be in development.
Oh, and Russia would be better off recycling all of those T-55s it owns into better tanks/civilian cars.
T-95 doesn't look like in ENdWar. EndWar uses modofied Black Eagles
Mr.Hanky2005
08-01-2007, 08:26 PM
Originally posted by PrinceCaspian5:
are you sure it was 500 billion dollars? I was just looking it up and this site (http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/putin-proposes-22-increase-for-official-fy-2006-russian-defense-budget-01058/) said that Russia's defense budget was 668.3 billion rubles, which (at current excange rates) equals about 26 billion USD
Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_federations_by_military_expe nditures) never lies http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif.
US total- 532,800,000,000
Russia total- 32,400,000,000
These are both measured in USD
pointandlaugh
08-03-2007, 05:39 PM
Japan has a large military budget for a country who can't wage war.
DayWarrior
08-09-2007, 06:57 PM
Russia will not buy a lot of tanks, we have a lot, and if now we have money it is doesn't mean we will spend it for the tanks. Haha, all the world byes our tehnics and will we buy ...hhoho. But it is not matter how many money or tanks we have, every good expert knows - one russian t-90 + russian men in = 10 american abrams with americans and not only becouse its stronger http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif), all other oppinions are politics dancing. And i want to say one thing, there is one rule in this world - the strongest side never want the war,but anyway its stays the strongest, its about ww2, about cold war and about our time and US PRO. Russia has a lot of problems after many years of sleeping, and no one want the war, but if it began, you will see, we will kick us in her *** and destroy all mc'donalds in the eurasia. Americans can eat this if they like http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif)
Qballed
08-10-2007, 07:11 PM
Originally posted by TFCC:
I thought that the armour in question in the picture was actually the French Leclarec tank is it not or are we sure it is the Swed's because I thought that the Leclarec would make more sense (sorry for my spelling) as well those are perhaps Mirage 2000 fighters in the sky or maybe I have mistaken them too...
The fighters are EF Typhoons.
Originally posted by muttbut:
The first photo he was talking about was the EU, Swedish CV90-120's, French VBCI IFV's, Italian/UK Merlin helicopters, ect Wink
I'm not sure what Helos they are, but they are definatly not EH-101 Merlins
wolfman921988
08-17-2007, 07:23 PM
It seems they have russian camo so i guess yes Also it looks like a big military parade so its a definate yes.
pointandlaugh
08-17-2007, 07:28 PM
That's the EU. You can tell because on the side of the NH-90 it says "EU".
Originally posted by Qballed:
I'm not sure what Helos they are, but they are definatly not EH-101 Merlins
I think it's the NHI NH-90
S.V.A.R.O.G.
09-18-2007, 02:27 PM
Originally posted by TFCC:
But then put a M1A1 Abrams versus a T-90, and the 11 millions dollars pays off and crushes the T-90 into little bits, moving on to the next T-90 commander, who thinks he has what it takes(being sadly mistaken).
M1A1 versus T-90? Forget it, the Abrams doesn't stand a chance!
carnotrankine
10-14-2007, 03:19 AM
When the russians build tanks it is about 18 to one ratio , so that very large losses can be repeated over and over with no loss of combat support for units. Fast built, fast over haul ,simplest design .When they get it right it truely is great .By 2020 the M1A1 is a very dated design .Isreal tanks in end war would be interesting .But what is important are each of the major players going to get Ghost units to inflict on the oponents?
KJ_White
10-14-2007, 04:54 AM
i'd love to see what the isralies will be using by 2020 i'm quite a fan of the merkava IV and i think each nation will have an equivlant sf unit to the ghosts.
KJ_White
10-14-2007, 04:57 AM
Originally posted by LordTenacious:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by LordTenacious:
On a side note, awesomest picture of T-90.
http://fofanov.armor.kiev.ua/Tanks/MBT/t-90_mob1.jpg
5 bucks says the driver was saying "WHEE!!"
This was from mid 90 military show. I've heard that after seying how T-90 was jumping from hills, americans tried to do the same in their Abrams. M1A1 crew broke their bones! http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_eek.gif </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Wouldn't surprise me if this was true. M1A1 isn't designed for jumping. The Abrams chassis is made for stabilty over extremely rough and steep terrain, but not jumping. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
lol abrams crew owned. the aussie army did the same thing with the old leopard tanks they on the other hand were succesful.
Jimjemael_796
10-14-2007, 01:02 PM
Originally posted by KJ_White:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by LordTenacious:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SkyRaptorRUS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by LordTenacious:
On a side note, awesomest picture of T-90.
http://fofanov.armor.kiev.ua/Tanks/MBT/t-90_mob1.jpg
5 bucks says the driver was saying "WHEE!!"
This was from mid 90 military show. I've heard that after seying how T-90 was jumping from hills, americans tried to do the same in their Abrams. M1A1 crew broke their bones! http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_eek.gif </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Wouldn't surprise me if this was true. M1A1 isn't designed for jumping. The Abrams chassis is made for stabilty over extremely rough and steep terrain, but not jumping. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
lol abrams crew owned. the aussie army did the same thing with the old leopard tanks they on the other hand were succesful. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Lol tanks bouncing towards you would scare the **** out of me! Reckon u could use it as an advantage u know like jumping over treches lol.
LordTenacious
10-14-2007, 07:12 PM
Then again, jumping tanks are just asking to get stuck on something.
S.V.A.R.O.G.
10-17-2007, 03:50 AM
Those "jumps" were intended to show the endurance and quality of the tank's suspension. After all, until recently, only soviet/russian tanks were able to perform such stunts.
KJ_White
10-17-2007, 09:36 PM
only now??? i was talking about the vietnam era leopard tank.
Gen-Stonewall
10-21-2007, 02:01 PM
Originally posted by pointandlaugh:
Japan has a large military budget for a country who can't wage war.
They dont have a military but they have the worlds "best police force"
muttbut
10-22-2007, 09:23 AM
Originally posted by Gen-Stonewall:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by pointandlaugh:
Japan has a large military budget for a country who can't wage war.
They dont have a military but they have the worlds "best police force" </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Actually they do have a formidable military, and since the consitution has been changed and they have a defence ministry now,I'm pretty confident the GSDF/ASDF/NSDF will change to proper Army ai force and navy, hell they have an offensive SOF unit now, new amphibious assult ships and a new "helicopter cruiser2 that looks like a baby aircraft carrier and have talked openly about pre-emptive air strikes on NK missile sites
vazquezlax
11-11-2007, 02:07 PM
uh...idk if someone already said this but im pretty sure that Ivan's tanks in EndWar are those new (and new as in prototype) Black Eagle MBTs....
snapkracklepop
11-11-2007, 05:18 PM
They look like T-90s. I think the T95 will probably be adopted instead of the black eagle.
tylniles
11-12-2007, 06:15 PM
the one's in the EndWar screenshots are the BlackEagle, which is actually a derivative of the t-80. according to my "jane's armor recognition guide" it's designated the -
T-80 UM-2 "BlackEagle".
SteelEagleStan
11-17-2007, 07:21 PM
Someone said that the Abrams costs $11,000,000? The cost of a new M1A2 is $4.3 million.
Lima Construction Plant Where They Make the M1A2 (http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/lima.htm#prof)
Da_Costa1982
11-21-2007, 03:15 PM
Abrahams can jump!!! Google it (or ask me for a foto...i'm not that decrepit I've seen it!)...
SteelEagleStan
11-21-2007, 07:27 PM
Being able to jump doesn't mean anything for the Russian tanks- and the story about the Abrams crew getting hurt while trying to jump just smacks of Russian militarist propaganda.
LOL WE R TRU RUSSIA, WE NEVR R HURT SILLY AMERICANS HAVE BRITTLE BONES THEY SHULD DRINK MORE MILK!