burninator718
07-02-2009, 06:09 PM
Hey, I tried looking in the Chessmaster manual, but I couldn't seem to find answers to my questions.
First, When analyzing games, I use the training mode and the mentor lines feature. On the side, it says "Depth" and gives numbers like 1/10 or 2/13. What do these numbers mean? I'm pretty sure the second one is how many moves it looked ahead, but what does the first number mean then?
Second, when doing the "analyze" feature, the game tells me when Chessmaster agrees/disagrees. My question is, what qualifies a move to be agreeable to chessmaster? I mean, obviously, any move that causes a severe loss in position and points will be disagreeable, but what else?
Thanks!
Also, on a side note, how is somebody supposed to use chessmaster to analyze games? I find that the analyze feature is really ambiguous and doesn't help much besides when I want to see my agreement percentage, however the mentor lines are only available for a ranked game if I save and go back to it in the training mode. Is there some other way I'm supposed to analyze my games?
Thanks again!
First, When analyzing games, I use the training mode and the mentor lines feature. On the side, it says "Depth" and gives numbers like 1/10 or 2/13. What do these numbers mean? I'm pretty sure the second one is how many moves it looked ahead, but what does the first number mean then?
Second, when doing the "analyze" feature, the game tells me when Chessmaster agrees/disagrees. My question is, what qualifies a move to be agreeable to chessmaster? I mean, obviously, any move that causes a severe loss in position and points will be disagreeable, but what else?
Thanks!
Also, on a side note, how is somebody supposed to use chessmaster to analyze games? I find that the analyze feature is really ambiguous and doesn't help much besides when I want to see my agreement percentage, however the mentor lines are only available for a ranked game if I save and go back to it in the training mode. Is there some other way I'm supposed to analyze my games?
Thanks again!