update RVS

[Sergedlm]

why dont <b style="color:black;background-color:#a0ffff">ubi[/b] just update game engine and graphics to Rvs
still a good game to play

[Sergedlm]

why dont <b style="color:black;background-color:#a0ffff">ubi[/b] just update game engine and graphics to Rvs
still a good game to play

[sl0ppy_sec0nds]

That's how everyone sees it here now. So far it has been proven to be correct.<div class="ev_tpc_signature">

----------------------

http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/255/vegaskv9.png
Rainbow Six 3: Raven Shield "It's simply the best tactical shooter currently available on the PC". -Gamespy.com
"Sadly, Lockdown may go down in history as the installment that kills the Rainbow Six franchise." -Gamespy.com

[Reeper_3d]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by dannyboy1026:
Alright, here's how I see it:
<b style="color:black;background-color:#a0ffff">Ubi[/b] is trying to appeal to the casual gamer to enlarge the market size. As a side effect, they're making the hardcore gamers, ditch the series.

So is my following thought correct?:
It's possible to make a casual gamer hardcore, but impossible to make a hardcore gamer casual. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

No and Yes

Yes First, you are corrent in the sense that it

[captainlol]

Define 'hardcore' and 'casual' for me.

Until then, it can go both ways in my opinion (kinda like a bisexual http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif) Anyways, casual gamers can easily become hardcore, if they find enough enjoyment in a game to want to play it all the time (or something..still waiting on that definition) I don't see why it is so difficult for hardcore gamers to become casual; say if the person gets bored of a game or decides that there are more important things to deal with (i.e. life)